From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: Walt Pinkerton Esq.
Cc: rest;
Subject: RE: continued
representation....G-D WILLING.
Walt,
I
just got back from shopping at Jimbos with our 90-year-old but extraordinarily young, healthy mind healthy body, friend Gene Requa where we mainly shopped for our
dogs who as you would expect are treated like gods.
I
have promised Gene whose Studebaker
has ignition problems that I will pick him up at 5:30 less than 10 minutes and
I don’t want to be “tTOo” [sic] late since we are going as
we did yesterday to Dog Beach that requires quite a bit of time
given how 3 of the dogs are getting on in years and it takes them a little
longer to get in to Marie’s Pathfinder.
Given
how my thoughts are pretty clear in terms of what I have to say I should be
able to complete the task on time, my friend Rob who lives right across from
Gene just stopping by our rented Cliff House with his dog.
Your
continued obfuscation, i.e. mischief is duly noted.
For
your records, please make note that your email below was sent and received by
my computer at
Furthermore,
you initiated a phone call to me on my cell phone, 1-858-SEL-NEXT, 59 minutes earlier at exactly
Moreover,
you did 99.99% of the talking, no strike that, extraordinary “fast
talking” all geared, in my humble but seasoned opinion, to let me know
that you had not received the email I sent you at 1:47 PM from my wife Marie’s
Yahoo email account that informed you that you had been fired.
Please
make certain when your partner Roy Doppelt reads all our communiqués “back
and forth” beginning with the one you sent me at
More
importantly, I shall use both your words and deafening silences to most of all
send a clear message to both the next generation as well as independent
thinkers to watch out should they find themselves in
a feeding frenzy amongst sharks who don’t take kindly to being told by their
feeders they no longer wish to be milked.
Again,
leave it to me to inform Greedy I have
not had sex in over a year-Drug Pusher Beckham’s lawyer-liars that you have been fired leaving you to simply
provide Judge Bloom with all our communications beginning with the email I sent
you yesterday at 10:37 AM PT and to let him know that if he
is interested in hearing the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,
to simply type the words “Gevisser Gary
Bloom” on the Google search engine
Or
Go
to www.SupremeInternetCourt.com
and to choose Gevisser Vs Greedy that along with all the other subject matters
will be updated in due course.
Gary
S. Gevisser
Ps – The price of gold last
traded in
Ps I – I assume you would see no
copyright infringement on my part if I take the illogical and, in my humble opinion,
rather sinful Bible-pumping garbage you dumped on me when I visited with you
last Friday morning and to use it again to help the masses understand clearly
that it is almost impossible to get justice from a system built on such a weak
foundation where the meek fall victim time and again to the
corrupt church like academia the new corrupt church and our so bought and paid
for politicians who make the laws all geared towards trickling down the costs
of the rich getting richer on to the backs of the poor and downtrodden.
Again
without the church there would be no poor and without the poor there would be
no church.
The
continued failure of your profession from those at the very top like Mr.
The
likes of Mr. JRK, no doubt more
intimately familiar with my “work
product” than you used to dealing with “small potatoes”
would very much like to see you much more desperate take me on “big time” if
for no other reason than to slow down my bringing to a grinding halt their extraordinary
gravy train, you know of course SCALs
[Shareholder Class Action Litigators] to quote Bill Lerach Esq.
the 1,000 pound gorilla SCAL, “I have no clients” to mention little of Joe
Grundfest, former chairman of the SEC, throwing in his two pennies, “What we have here is a shell game” in the eye-opener article The King of Pain is Hurting published in
Yes,
Mr. lawyer-liar it will come down “tTOo”
[sic] not only the evidence, the better the
evidence the better the proof, but my versus your “credibility” and if
necessary the “credibility” of Judge Bloom and if necessary the credibility of
each and every Justice of the Supreme Court of the
United States.
Ps II – I will check this for
readability upon my return, G-d willing.
[Word
count 1020]
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser c/o
Sent:
To: walt@help411.com
Cc: rest;
devinstandard@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Transcript...---..."Was Marie correct in what she
heard?"...---... You are fired!
Walt - I am using Marie's Yahoo email account.
I have now heard the message you left earlier on the
answering machine here at
You are fired.
You are to inform Judge Bloom immediately.
Leave it to me to
inform Ted Kimball's law firm.
Make certain when providing Judge
Bloom with any expl
Furthermore, I will be
filing a complaint with the appropriate authorities of your gross negligence
Or
Culpability take your pick!
Gary S. Gevisser
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: Walt Pinkerton
Cc: rest;
Subject: RE: Transcript...---..."Was Marie correct in what she
heard?"...---...
Your continued refusal to answer my simple but
rather important question is increasingly troubling.
Again, “Was Marie correct in what she heard?”
Recapping: You called earlier today and left a
message on the answering machine over at 357 Parish Lane, our second rented
residence here in Del Mar, stating, I understand very clearly perhaps not in so
many words that,
“I
never came across in the email
To repeat the last paragraph of that 1241 word
email prior to ending with the words, “Good luck”:
You now have our permission to try settle this case
so that we can stay the remainder of the lease not to forget that our one dog
is now with our friend Gene and our Italian greyhound is mostly at the Cliff
House our other RENTED residence here in Del Mar.
What exactly prevents you from answering my simple
but rather important question bearing in mind your reply to that 1241 rather
well worded communiqué spelling out a number of troubling matters to both Marie
and me?
To repeat your “reply” email to me that I received
later yesterday at
…Based
upon your recent e-mail to me I will not explore settlement and await the
court's decision…
[Word count 234]
-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Transcript
I will contact Kristen Connor to discuss settlement. Please advise me re: terms.
I did not threaten you I informed you that Ms. Connor had communicated to me regarding your e-mails and their content.
The cost for the transcript is for the preparation of same and the cost is not known in advance of the trial proceedings because length is not then known.
Please contact me to discuss settlement terms.
Best Regards,
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: continued representation
Dear Gary:
1) I received your message that you no longer desire to use our legal services. If this is correct, please come to the office tomorrow afternoon and sign the required substitution of attorney for both the eviction case and the retaliatory eviction case to inform both the court and all other parties and their counsel of your self-representation. I appreciate your trust and confidence in me and my firm and am sorry that you feel that you no longer desire to use our services.
2) As to the settlement, I had communicated both your offer and that of Beckham's offer for settlement of the unlawful detainer action prior to the trial. You will recall that the judge advised in chambers settlement of these type matters was in the parties' best interests. Ms. Connor related that her client was willing to continue the tenancy provided you dismiss the retailatory eviction matter and stop contacting or communicating with Kathy Clark. You directed me to reject this offer which I did and we proceeded to trial. As you know, the court has not rendered its decision to date and based upon our evidence adduced at trial and our brief on the restrictive covenant, I hope that the court will rule in your favor.
3). Per your e mail of yesterday regarding settlement, I notified you that I had contacted Ms. Connor and advised you that she related that her client would only settle for your temination of the tenancy and upon your agreement to do so, she would discuss with him a waiver of costs and fees. She advised that her client would not settle under the same terms and conditions as of date of trial. She had transmitted to me by fax and first class mail, which I forwarded to you yesterday, her letter detailing a review of your e-mail which she maintains has defamed her client. I suspect that Beckham's desire to have you vacate the premises is influenced by your e-mail transmissions regarding him and the case.
4) As to the procedural posture, your file is being copied in our office today and will be ready for you to pick up tomorrow afternoon when you sign your substitution of attorney and I need to advise you that there are many deadlines and procedures that you will need to follow in acting as your own attorney. The complaint for the retaliatory eviction will need to amended, as we discussed, since we filed it quickly in order to protect your rights with the eviction trial already being set. You will be able to amend the complaint without leave of court, and without any prejudice to your rights, prior to service of the complaint on the defendants. Of course the evidence aduced at trial can now be incorporated into the amended complaint which I was in the process of preparing. As per our telephone conference today I have ceased working on your case.
I am in the office for the remainder of the day if you would like to call and discuss.
Best regards,
Walter E. Pinkerton, Jr., Esq.
