From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:18 AM PT
To:
Pollyroger@aol.com
Subject: RE: Rental application

 

Polly,

 

I was not able to read the rental application you sent in the attachment, let alone print it out.

 

We need more of a “meeting of the mindsbefore going to any more bother.

 

We are concerned that you are not even prepared to give us a 6 month option after the one year lease which quite frankly talks to what intentions you might have to jack up the rent at the end of the 12 months?

 

The fact that your personal situation may result in you wanting to move back into your house says everything about the level of “instability” in this race for “survival of the richest” that Marie and I do not want to partake in, i.e. Marie, most certainly, refuses to a cow on your dairy farm.

 

Unless you can provide us with better assurances we are going to pass.

 

Perhaps, it is also worth your while to understand better assuming you cannot click on to the hyperlinks our skepticism of people who make a living out of real estate relying on real estate inflationary bidding wars to get by in this “dog eat god aspartame” [sic] world by reading the communiqué I sent earlier to my one attorney.

 

Gary

 

Ps – Let me know if you would like to be added to my email list that represents a statistically valid sampling of the world’s literate population, each one “on average” forwarding my missives to 10 other individuals-groups.

 

[Word count 242]

 

 

From: Gary S. Gevisser [mailto:gsg@sellnext.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:37 AM
To: 'Walt Pinkerton'
Subject: RE: ....crap...FECES...GREEDY...---...RAT FACE...

 

Walt,

 

Your “explore” is a far cry from when you agreed to be our advocate after we presented you with ALL the evidence of wrongdoing by Greedy Beckham.

 

His lawyer-liar Kristin provided NOTHING that has taken away from the “proof” of Greedy’s wrongdoing you have had in your possession from day one.

 

On the contrary Beckham’s declarations in court, under oath, under penalty of perjury, show beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is not only a drug dealer but broke the cardinal rule amongst dope dealers of never getting high on their own supply.

 

ALL the evidence is overwhelming that the RAT FACE has the “goods on him” and was willing to use her CIA connections to “threaten and intimidate” Greedy to act the way she wanted him to act.

 

Go back time and again to the communiqué Marie, with my significant input, sent to Greedy containing the 366 word message Greedy left on my answering service on June 3rd before then hitting us with a 3 Day Notice to quit.

 

The fact that he blamed his “lack of sex in over a year” as being the “personal information” I had on him that had him calling me “evil” says everything that is wrong with our judicial system especially when compounded with his hand written letter of December 14th of last year, such inconsistencies you should have pounded away at ad-nausea until this scoundrel collapsed into a heap of tears, his lies catching up with him the result of my painstaking efforts to collect ALL the evidence that spoke to the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

 

Why else other than RAT FACE having the goods on Greedy would he, the LandLORD, have NOT got rid of her, such an extraordinarily problem tenant living in an illegal dwelling unit, now without a stove, who happens to be on a month to month lease paying the Knudsons, the owners of the property a pittance when compared to not only what we pay for the little use we get out of the main dwelling area but don’t forget the monies the Knudsons are supposed to have invested in making RAT FACE so comfortable, just another poorly conditioned human being who can enjoy a sunset paying some $100 or so a month more than what I was paying for the same space that I was mainly using as my office.

 

So when Beckham started going on about him not agreeing to have me use the washing machine and dryer and there of course being no mention of this in the lease why but for an “ACT of G-d” would you have let him off the hook, unless you thought his extraordinary excuse, “I have not had sex in over a year” would be enough to “nail him to the cross”?

 

It was quite obvious that the Judge was either too distracted or bored to death to even recognize the significance of Greedy’s loud declarations which should have had you do the job we had paid you to do.

 

Yes, I commended you in a previous communiqués since I saw no purpose in “beating a dead horse” hoping that it would invigorate you to do the right thing and the smart thing which is also the right thing and pull out all stops to see justice done, not for Marie and my sake but for the next generation increasingly fed up with all the bullshit who I am encouraging so strongly not to take to the streets and run the risk of being slaughtered like animals, mankind, the oxymoron of all time, no surprise we treat our “own” so poorly given how unkind we are to G-D-NAture, ripping the earth apart so as to live the “good life” lacking no conscience as we mortgage our children’s future through out of control real estate development, these real estate inflationary bidding wars soon coming to an end, perhaps more abruptly than those making their living in this business would care to believe.

 

I know what I know, leaving belief to the corrupt church increasingly just like academia, the new corrupt church, getting deafeningly silent.

 

Without the church there would be no poor and without the poor there would be no church.

 

Again, how many people in this so fricken indifferent and transient society rent twice from the same LandLORD?

 

Nothing seems to add up other than gross incompetence or culpability?

 

You had me pay $636 to get a court reporter to make a recording of what is turning out to be just another charade, another travesty of justice and now I understand I will have to pay another sum of similar amount to get it transcribed to hear how you let Greedy and his co-conspirator RAT FACE go on and on and on about how concerned he was about renting to me for the second time, enough to make me vomit?

 

Yes, I will pay those additional monies and yes I will broadcast both the questions posed and answers given as well as the lack of proper follow up ad-nausea.

 

The fact that the judge wasn’t able to see through all their lies and rule in our favor right then and there seemed fairly obvious to Marie and me given how you never provided the court with all the emails I sent Ms. RAT FACE Clark from the very day we moved in talking very clearly about her poor behavior and what she and Greedy needed to do in order to “get in line.”

 

Moreover, that you would let RAT FACE like her “partner” Greedy smile from ear to ear when not gritting their teeth, providing the court with a rendering that it look like it was Marie who “attacked” her after RAT FACE admits she dropped an email I sent her at our doorstep is bizarre beyond belief UNLESS of course you failed to provide the court with all our communications from day one when we moved in realizing that we were dealing with such a poorly conditioned human being whose screaming matches with herself talk volumes as has again all the fricken deafening silences.

 

Am I disgusted and upset?

 

Yes!

 

Am I as upset as the Knudsons as well as each and every independent thinking human being, should be?

 

No, not even close?

 

The fact that I gave evidence on the stand to having responded both to RAT FACE and Beckham in writing was simply my word against theirs, bearing in mind how Greedy went on and on about not knowing a thing about there any problems with the RAT FACE until some 6 months after we moved in.

 

The fact that you submitted his one letter into evidence, written some 14 days after we moved in that talks volumes to his culpability appeared to be totally lost on Judge Bloom and therefore required you to painstakingly go through all the evidence we provided you in “black and white” in terms of how to rip apart both Greedy and RAT FACE.

 

You now have our permission to try settle this case so that we can stay the remainder of the lease not to forget that our one dog is now with our friend Gene and our Italian greyhound is mostly at the Cliff House our other RENTED residence here in Del Mar.

 

Good luck,

 

Gary

 

Ps – I assume you got Part 1 of my “money creation” communiqué to the President?

 

[Word count 1241]

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
Monday, September 19, 2005 3:45 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: ....crap...FECES...

 

Thank you for the e-mail.

 

    I wanted to discuss with you my thinking and strategy in your matter.

 

    For you to settle the case you want to have Kathy (aka rat face) removed and also carry on with your retailiatory eviction action.  For Beckham to settle he won't give Kathy the ax and wants you to abandon your retailiatory eviction action. 

 

    It looks like the parties can't settle.  But let's look at the city of Del Mar action for enforcement of their code.  This could get Kathy out (given sufficient time).   To maintain such an action you must have standing.  Your residency at Parrish Street gives you standing.  Without your residency you would have no standing to demand enforement of the code.  In fact, if you are involuntarily removed, I suspect Beckham could include your  residence with that of Kathy's to come into compliance.  This would fit with your assessment that he is concerned that Kathy would blow his cover if he became antagonistic toward her.

 

In order to maintain standing re:  Del Mar code enforcement you need the standing as tennant.  Presently, the judge is awaiting, as am I, the reply brief by Beckham's attorney.  I figure that he will have an answer by Friday and we will be noticed by Monday or Tuesday.  The only way to guarantee your residency would be settlement with Beckham at this time.  What would you have to conceed?

 

    You would have to abandon your civil action for retailitory eviction.  I have discussed the strength and weaknesses with this action.  It is certainly not a "slam dunk"!!!  If the court finds that the animal condition was breached by you then the three day notice can still be maintained and there goes the retailatory eviction.  Of course if the judge rules in your favor and does not terminate the tenancy because he finds that you did not breach the terms of the lease then your action would be viable however not a guarantee of a win.

    If you would like me to Kristin I will to explore settlement.  Please advise.

 

Walter

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Gary S. Gevisser

To: President@whitehouse.gov

Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 12:42 PM

Subject: FW: ....crap... FECES....

 

FYI

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From:
Pollyroger@aol.com [mailto:Pollyroger@aol.com]
Sent:
Monday, September 19, 2005 9:46 PM
To:
gsg@sellnext.com
Subject: Rental application

 

Gary-it might be nice if I attached the rental application for your and Marie's completion and signatures!  Please call me tomorrow if you have any questions on my cell phone 858-774-2505, and if possible fax to my home fax of 858-755-2481 when completed.  Many thanks again,
Polly