From: Marie Dion
Sent:
To:
Cc: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: FW: Marie Dion Vs.....
Not
informing me ahead of time that you would not produce a copy of the document
referenced in
It is my
privilege and your “work product” is, I believe, my property. Your
childish behavior, telling me that I needed to first make an appointment with
your secretary who was gone for the day is outrageous and shows fear on your
part.
Marie Dion
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: ajp@martin-passante.com
Cc:
Subject: Marie
Dion Vs.....
Marie will
be over at your offices no later than
From: Marie Dion [mdg42203@sbcglobal.net]
Sent:
To: Anthony Passante
Cc: GsG@sellnext.com
Subject: FW: Dion Vs Warren et al
Just in the event you thought
-----Original Message-----
From: Marie Dion c/o Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: (ajp@martin-passante.com)
Cc:
Subject: Dion Vs Warren et al
Tony,
Since
I have not heard back from you, should your move be to approach the court
without me present it will show again your culpable state of mind and I am sure
the vast majority of open minded people would agree with us.
In
not so many words I will at the appropriate time convey to the court as well as
the court of public opinion, our one website www.SupremeInternetCourt.com, just
one avenue for me and others like-minded to expression our outrage, how in fact
you showed no hesitation in taking the case realizing that it was such a clear
cut easy to deal with case, on top of having my advisor-husband Gary Gevisser
providing all the footwork thereby reducing your work load quite a bit such
that I didn’t need to prepare any more than I had already. I simply
needed to have someone ask the right questions which I have given you plenty of
opportunity to email me or did you want me to formulate the questions for you?
I
am prepared to tell the truth and that should be sufficient and if it is not
then I am glad I didn’t invest any more money and emotion in this case
since the system is obviously too corrupt.
In
several of our emails we made it clear this case was public and for you to now
play victim is a little too much for me to take, your letter of November 17th
, not the first time that you have demonstrated unapproved communications with
the other party in breach of my attorney-client privilege.
At
this point I cannot trust you.
Marie
Dion
From: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To:
Cc: GsG
Subject: FW: Warren v. Stewart
Tony,
Your move.
Marie
[word
count 4]
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Cc: ajp@martin-passante.com
Subject: RE:
Marie –Tony’s communications speak clearly.
After accessing your email account I ran into the lawyer
who first referred Gary Matlin Esq. Tony’s associate.
This lawyer whose name escapes me right now seemed at a
loss for words altho he only had my word on the very clear written record,
“Time is of the essence”, the attorney-client
privilege YOUR privilege NOT the lawyer’s privilege, something this
lawyer agreed not every single human being on this planet is made aware of by
their lawyer, more so than ever be4 thanks to u and me the masses including the
Lumpen Proletarians getting increasingly up to speed on how the “real
world” works in this “dog eat god” [sic] world.
You may in fact need to retain 2 attorneys, following the
advice of Tony who have been the one to suggest going to the yellow pages and
having say Pypeetoe sniff, then again I believe Tony is your “attorney of
record”, meaning I am not quite certain how easy it would be for him if
he were to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help
each of us G-D, to leave u high and dry after failing to follow thru on your
explicit instructions, now for the first time hearing his reasoning which even
if it were sound seems a rather lame excuse, again, “Time is of the essence”.
Moreover, I am not quite sure exactly how much of a
retainer u paid, I recall u picking up an error in the amount that resulted in
Tony not all that hurriedly getting what was agreed to “substituted
in.”
Now u know I am not an attorney but pride myself in
providing my very “best efforts” which I think u may have heard me
say has been interpreted, at least according to Bill Squadron Esq. by courts
here in the United States as nothing short of bankrupting the idiot,,, willing
to place such wording in a binding contract which is what I have done with u, u
have my word that if I fail u I will not, I repeat, I will not beg for mercy.
U have not met Bill Squadron the President of SporTVision
a spin-off of the Fox Network owned by Rupert Murdoch who has this funny
Australian accent, not to make fun of either Rupert, whose attorney of some 30+
years was Bill’s father, or Bill since he made a point after we had one
great time together during World Cup 1998, at which time u shopped until you
dropped, no strike that, walked about the streets of Paris attracting shoppers
as u do wherever u go, of giving me this 1997
Stanley Cup electronic hockey puck that his group developed to
track the ice hockey on TV.
Networking the name of the game.
Your move.
[word count 472]
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Passante
Sent:
To: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Subject: RE:
The trial is scheduled for the
29th now because
of Ms. Goetz' surgery.
Tony Passante
Tue 11/16/2004
Tony,
I have permission from Marie to access her email
account.
What time is the trial on the 18th?
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Passante
Sent:
To: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Subject: RE:
Marie,
My email of
your settlement demand had been made. I did not
forward your email of
a brief letter to opposing counsel advising them of
your demand. That is what prompted their offer to
allow you to stay in the house until
I would not send the contents of
your email for
various reasons. It is a confidential
attorney-client communication and its contents do not further your case.
My impression is that the Warrens and their attorneys are not afraid of you and
that they have confidence in their case. There is nothing in your email
that will change that.
Since you are continuing to
refuse to meet with
me to prepare for trial, I do not wish to represent
your interests further. I will be sending via mail
the paperwork necessary to replace me.
Tony Passante
From: Marie
Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Tony
Passante Esq.
Cc: Gary S.
Gevisser
Subject: RE:
Tony,
To repeat myself I think we have covered the case
already.
If you have read what Gary Gevisser developed which I am
100% familiar with it should reassure you of our winning position. This is why my
demand for a quick settlement makes perfect sense. What exactly are you
missing?
Again, if you have any questions email me. I am more
comfortable in light of what has transpired communicating via email. At this
point I need my communications with you all documented and I am still waiting
to hear confirmation of my Settlement Demand with the Warrens-Goetz-Stubbs-law
firm of Kimball et al, i.e. - verbal communications get lost.
I thought lawyers prided themselves on legalize, the
written word being King. Even I can see the benefits of this.
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony
Passante Esq.
Sent:
To: Marie Dion
Stewart
Subject:
Marie,
Before this attorney-client
relationship
deteriorates further, I would appreciate you meeting
with me to discuss the case and your testimony.
I believe I communicate more
effectively in
person than by email or telephone. Accordingly,
please call my office to schedule a meeting at a time
convenient for you on Thursday, November 18.
Thank you.
Tony Passante
From: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Tony Passante Esq.
Cc: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE: FW: Warren v. Stewart
Tony,
Why did you not respond sooner?
Second, it was stated very clearly that not only was and
is time of the essence you were instructed back on November 4th to, "Please
forward this communiqué to Kimball et al.”
Today is the 12th and the first we hear that
you did in fact follow through on my explicit request.
Provide me with confirmation that you did exactly as I
requested.
I am disgusted by your insinuation of my wrongdoing,
“Your
refusal to meet with me to discuss your case violates the cooperation clause of
the Attorney-Client Fee Contract”
I did not refuse to meet with you, to repeat my November
5th email,
If you feel that I need to reassure you of my eloquence in
court then I will oblige. I don’t think we need to discuss this case any
further.
Any questions you can email.
And then this past Monday I followed up with;
I have yet to hear from you the purpose of this meeting.
Time is of the essence.
Question, have you forwarded the email stating my Settlement
Demands to the
You have to realize Gary and I are in business together. My
business is his business. His business is my business. We want it to be
successful. At the same time we want to improve humanity. We are in a position
to teach other people how to handle business like this one that has gone out of
control because of greed. It is an important issue to a lot of people in the
same situation as ours. We want to make the most of this win or lose.
Of course winning would be in our interest as well as yours,
this whole thing being so public.
Our initial meeting didn’t raise any doubts in your
mind as to the strength of the case, agreeing I seem to recall that the actions
of the Warrens et al was a waste of time, money and abuse of the system, agree?
Facts are facts, you cannot escape the emails. It is
black on grey, agree?
Our 12 year old Jonathan who 2 weeks ago was on The
Internet having participated in his first surfing competition just commenting,
“Just to be clear put in parentheses after “it” the words
“The screen”.
Marie
Ps - How
telling this sudden generosity of time from the Warrens and Ms. Goetz’s
fall vacation, so anxious a few months back to get me out, sparing no words or
effort like hiring lawyers, to mention little of asking me for a copy of the
lease document which spelled out in “black and white” their “malicious
fraud”, now delaying these matters maybe in the hopes of me
disappearing off the face of the earth?
So forgetful it seems you are of the damages caused to
our reputation and business as a result of their reckless behavior?
Ps I – To
repeat the closing paragraph of my November 4th email.
I
have yet to hear from u what claims can be made against such scoundrels along
with the damages I would be entitled to besides for what Mr. Gevisser who
recognizes rather well those who have consistently built into their cost
of sales the cost of getting caught being taking on
educational light journeys, dragged through
their own dirt, their formal education clearly having interfered with their
learning, The Internet from what I can gather quite the perfect medium for me
to express my grievances as opposed to keeping things so awfully quiet, the
deafening silences speaking volumes at this time including all the “fix” requests I have made
from the very beginning including the electrical sockets which pose a physical threat
to our well being, to mention how very beneath me it would be to ever play
victim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Passante
Sent:
To: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Subject: Re: FW:
Marie,
Your comment is disappointing
and unnecessary,
especially since your refusal to meet with me to
discuss your case violates the cooperation clause of
the Attorney-Client Fee Contract that we signed.
There are many fine lawyers in
free to hire any of them to represent you or you can
represent yourself if you so choose. I will
cooperate
in transferring your file.
I conveyed your demand and was waiting for a
response from the other side. I spoke to them this
morning and they rejected your demand. They have
offered to allow you to stay until
provided you agree to move out by that date and pay
rent for the time up until that date. Let me know
your response.
The trial date has been changed
again due to the
unavailability of Lori Goetz. The proposed new date
is
have a conflict.
Tony Passante
From: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Tony Passante Esq.
Cc: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE:
Tony – my take of you on our first
meeting was that I was hiring a professional lawyer, to be more precise, an
honest one.
Your lack of response makes me question what
to expect next.
Marie
From: Gary
Gevisser
To: Tony
Passante
Cc: Marie Dion
[Gevisser]
Date:
Tony,
On November 4th,
Should I bypass you and send it?
I don’t see the necessity for a meeting with you.
Marie has done her homework.
Again if you have any questions or doubts email us.
Ps - Again we
have a number of things on our plate, going public very possibly this morning
on the Howard Stern website is not, however, more important than catching crooks.
Again, I detest those who derive great satisfaction in
exceeding the limits of
their small authority, i.e. evil does not come in the form of a pointed tail or
pitched fork.
Don’t underestimate the power of The Superhighway.
It has proved to be effective in dealing with this sort of bullshit, check Eraider.com.
Again time is of the essence.
[Word count 154]
-----Original Message-----
From: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Tony Passante Esq.
Cc: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE:
Tony,
I have yet to hear from you the purpose of
this meeting.
Time is of the essence.
Question, have you forwarded the email
stating my Settlement Demands to the
You have to realize Gary and I are in
business together. My business is his business. His business is my business. We
want it to be successful. At the same time we want to improve humanity. We are
in a position to teach other people how to handle business like this one that
has gone out of control because of greed. It is an important issue to a lot of
people in the same situation as ours. We want to make the most of this win or
lose.
Of course winning would be in our interest as
well as yours, this whole thing being so public.
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Passante
Sent:
To: Marie Dion Stewart
Subject:
Marie,
The trial date was
moved to
11 at 10 or 11. Please let me know.
Tony Passante
From: Gary S.
Gevisser
Sent:
To: Anthony Passante Esq.
Cc: rest;
Marie Dion
Subject: FW:
Tony - My Client-Partner-Wife Marie
Dion has asked me to resolve as quickly as possible this
case, time being of the essence.
I assume given your response for us to meet u have not
only followed up as she requested to forward her settlement demand to the
owners of her beach rental property, again time
being of the essence, we have several business matters that I-We
have to take care, I-We could be any day now on Air Force One traveling the
world getting the masses up to speed on our Clean Water Fund project++++, surely the Warrens et al including
their attorneys from the lawyer-liar law firm of Kimball, Tirey & St. John have now responded, why else would u
want to meet?
-----Original Message-----
From: Marie
Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Anthony
Passante Esq.
Cc: GsG
Subject: RE:
Tony,
If you feel that I need to reassure you of my eloquence
in court then I will oblige. I don't think we need to discuss this case any
further.
Any questions you can email.
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony
Passante
Sent:
To: Marie Dion
[Gevisser]
Subject: RE:
Marie,
I need to have you and Gary come into my office
for a meeting next week. I have time on Thursday,
November 11.
Please advise.
Tony Passante
From: Marie Dion
[Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Anthony
Passante Esq.
Cc: GsG
Subject: RE:
Tony – When I met with you I had the impression you
knew this was a winning case with just the materials we gave you at the time.
The situation has not changed.
Let me be even clearer. I told you when we met
There can be no doubt that "sum" [sic] see fit,
derive great satisfaction that my ex-husband is still out there practicing his
profession when the vast majority of people in prison today, most of them
people of color have committed significantly less egregious crimes than Dr.
John Ben Stewart, his decision to attack Gary's very good name, insinuate the
most insidious of crimes just to get at me who decided to stand up to this
bigot of bigots is surely not lost on you as well as my current adversaries.
This case against my current foes does not simply come
down to "who to believe" since we have again the evidence in
"black and white" of their shenanigans, again rather well spelled out
in what I sent you yesterday with of course a good deal of input from Gary who
is again my advisor-partner-husband, his fees so far in providing I think you
would agree rather excellent services have yet to be computed to mention little
of his opportunity cost given all the other projects he as well as I have on
our plates, agree?
You surely have not forgotten it was Gary who pointed out
both the inconsistency of the lease documents presented by the leasing agent
Ms. Goetz and the one spelling out in “black and white” my being
entitled to an option to renew for one year as well as Gary again pointing out
the "scienter" in Ms. Goetz displaying one incredibly "blackened
hand" asking me to fax over to her my copy of the lease when she was
sitting with the original, it surely not taking a genius to work out what she
had hoped against all hope that somehow I had both lost both my mind as well as
the lease, agree?
Don’t get me wrong I know there is no such thing as
a “slam dunk” in court and you wanting to gather each and every
piece of evidence, my well aware of the doctrine, “the better the
evidence the better the proof” may seems diligent but at what cost versus
what benefit all this additional due diligence?
The fact that Gary got evicted from Mr. Simple
Smith’s studio because Commissioner Pennie M. Carlos while mocking Simple
Smith and his lawyer-liars to Kingdom Come felt while Gary had got permission
to trim the trees in his garden, well aware was Ms. Carlos that that "the
gardener" in the front house was "no gardener", chose for
“sum” [sic] reason to focus instead on Gary not having got
permission in writing to deduct $200 from his rent, so telling of a justice
system gone absolutely bananas, agree?
The failure of Commissioner Pennie M. Carlos to apply a
"materiality" factor to all that was going on rather telling even to
Lumpen Proletarians to mention little of the value of Gary’s lease with
also a clear option to renew on a $2 million odd piece of dirt for another year
rather significant, even more so when considering how prices of real estate particularly
in this part of Del Mar where prices are skyrocketing more than in the poorer
sections, Del Martians ranking amongst the richest spoiled brats in the entire
world, the result of a real estate inflationary bidding war within moments of
imploding, agree?
Folks such as yourself so familiar with Gary’s
style of writing taking so careful notice of Gary having steered the likes of
Mr. JRK of Finkelstein & Krinsk to
recognize Gary was not bluffing when he said he would end their gravy train, bringing
to an abrupt end share prices of public corporations continuing to go “up
and down” were Mrs. and Mr. JFK-HEINZ to end up in the White House,
agree?
And of course Tony there is not a lawyer-liar on the
planet today who is not cringing at Gary's 10 DAY NOTICE
hyperlink along with this
hyperlink to the lawyers opposing me who happen to be the same set of
lawyers-liars who shoveled the most incredible amount of bullshit in the face
of Commissioner Pennie M. Carlos, to mention little of Ms. Kristin Connor Esq.
of Kimball, Tirey and St. John while ducking her head low, the little shame
that she has written all over her face in defending Simple Smith who tried to
buy Gary out of his lease while failing to state that in fact Gary had an
option to renew for one year and when Gary said, "No!" to then think
nothing of trying to bribe me thinking that I would apply pressure on poor,
poor, Gary, quite sickening wouldn’t you agree for Ms. Connor Esq. to
then profess in "open court" that her client, Mr. Simple Smith,
“Does not intend to build on his piece of shit for years"
[sic]?
Frankly I see no reason for you to waste a moment looking
at their files hoping to uncover nothing more than the irrefutable
“smoking gun proof” of fraud and corruption already in our
possession, any reasonable person in the world concluding this is an "open
and shut" case, point being if we lose this one it will simply mean that I
will grant Gary S. Gevisser permission to once again, "pull out all
stops", my advisor-partner-husband, while yet to submit a single
bill for his incredible "value added" services didn’t just jump
off the ship yesterday, nor is he or I likely to head for the hills, important
wouldn’t u agree that it is time we all stood tall standing up to evil
each and every step of the way and of course I would expect you to be one of
the first to sign a petition forcing the legal profession to immediately fix
their “tardiness” that keeps the rich getting richer and the poor
increasingly the picture of the “cat and mouse” game played at
their expense, agree?
Remember my words, “The world would be far better
off if women were on permanent PMS then they wouldn’t put up with any of
the bullshit” as well as “When the dialogue becomes tTOo monologues
it is the beginning of the end” [sic].
Please address each and every one of my points should you
not concur 100%.
Furthermore, I want all communications you have with the
law firm of Kimball, Tirey and
Good day,
Marie
Ps – What makes you think you will get any
satisfaction out the owners of my beach rental property by you providing them
with all the items I have wanted to be fixed from the very beginning other than
it taking more of my time as well as impacting my pocket book, such monies
better spent wouldn’t you agree on getting to the word out to the Lumpen
Proletarians inching their way to the Digital Age.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Passante
Sent:
To: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Subject: Re:
Marie,
I have received your
message. Is
for you?? I understand that you want to keep
expenses
down and will forego taking deposition of Lori Goetz.
However, I do want to inspect her file to see what
other writings it may contain. The additional
expense
will be minimal.
With regard to the trial date of
November 12, I
must request a change due to conflicts with my
calendar. I have 3 other hearings that day, all of
which are in
on your case on Monday to request a continuance to the
week of November 14.
Please send an itemized list of
all items that
need to be fixed and I will pass that information on
to
Tony Passante
From: Marie
Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To: Anthony
Passante Esq.
Cc: GsG
Subject: RE:
Dear
Mr. Passante,
I prefer
at this time given the shadowy nature of the human beast to obfuscate poor
performance by throwing as much garbage against the wall as is humanly possible
to keep all communications with everyone via email, the “back and
forth” helpful in maintaining both my sanity as well as each and every
parties' point of view.
I
am in receipt of your letter dated November 1st 2004 which refers to
you thinking it prudent to depose Ms. Lori Goetz the real estate agent of the
Warrens, owners of my beach rental property and that as an alternative if I
didn’t wish to spend the additional monies to have u submit a request to
review Goetz’s lease file.
I
see both steps as a waste of money as well as my time since I would have to
review more garbage given what we already have in our possession beginning with
a signed lease demonstrating beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was granted a
one year option to renew, page 5 containing the option and page 6 the signature
page totally consistent with my point of view to mention little of my
credibility to mention just in passing what I believe to be evidence of
malicious fraud on the part of Ms. Goetz, her company Stubbs Realty and Ms.
Goetz’s principals Mr. and Mrs. Warren, Ms. Goetz requesting that I fax
over to her my copy of the lease quite a statement of her
“scienter” which according to my advisor-partner-husband, Gary S.
Gevisser, denotes, “culpable state of mind”, a term used in SCALs [Shareholder
Class Action
Litigation], Mr. Gevisser, altho not an
attorney is rather well versed in coaching SCAL
Litigators such as Milberg Weiss-Lerach & Finkelstein & Krinsk, to name
but 2 of the better known SCALs to
respond to fast balls thrown at or near head.
I am
sickened to my stomach; the fish rots from the head down, to mention little of
my 2 children who have been a party to such egregious criminal misconduct by
all the parties including the lawyer-liars of the law firm of Kimball, Tirey
and
In
nutshell, like Mr. Gevisser, I detest those who derive great satisfaction in
exceeding the limits of their small authority, i.e. evil does not come in the
form of a pointed tail or pitched fork.
My
suggested course of action is to purse this trial set for November 12th
letting the world know I am prepared to accept a settlement before trial of
$50,000 dollars, vacate the house no later than December 1st 2004,
Mr. Gevisser agreeing not to continue issuing new broadcasts nor would he
pursue steps calling for a full investigation of the Warrens so vocal in their
disdain of their employer; suffice to say following trial I will pursue each
and every individual with a vengeance sparing no effort while deriving great
satisfaction from now until eternity watching each and every individual group
who has usurped their limited authority who saw very possibly an opportunity to
take advantage of my status, a mother of “tTOo” [sic] children
living independently.
I
have yet to hear from u what claims can be made against such scoundrels along
with the damages I would be entitled to besides for what Mr. Gevisser who
recognizes rather well those who have consistently built into their cost
of sales the cost of getting caught being taking on
educational light journeys, dragged thought their own dirt, their formal
education clearly having interfered with their learning, The Internet from what
I can gather quite the perfect medium for me to expresses my grievances as
opposed to keeping things so awfully quiet, the deafening silences speaking
volumes at this time including all the “fix” requests I have made
from the very beginning including the electrical sockets which pose a physical
threat to our well being, to mention how very beneath me it would be to ever
play victim.
Yours
sincerely,
Marie
Dion
Ps
– Please forward this communiqué to Kimball etal.
[Word
count 678]
