From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: RBJ
Cc: rest; duff;
Subject: RE: "Court rules against Ron Jr's Constitution" [sic]!!!
Dear Ron Junior - By now u should be "sumwhat" [sic], accustomed to my style of writing, agree?
Perhaps, by the time u return to college in this lifetime
The next, my Bottoms Up Schooling will be “standard operating procedure”?
So important to be “smart”, be4 shooting off one’s mouth to chew on one’s words, smoke some weed if it will help u hold your tongue, agree?
So careful should u be at this time in not letting your formal education interfere with your learning, u continuing to come across like there is some worldwide conspiracy, forgetting time and again, those who control the pursue strings, i.e. it is all about the power of money, can barely stand the sight of one another let alone agree to sit around the dining room table and decide how to carve up the world, agree?
U cannot falter by first applying your basic knowledge of Science, Mathematics, Art, Religion and Technology, go “back and forth” giving some thought to why it is that www.NextraTerresTrial.com, my infantile looking website remains on track to be the number one website on the planet, agree?
Bear in mind that my partner-wife Marie Dion has in fact come up with the one and only solution to solve all the problems of the world in one incredible chess move, which is not to suggest she still wont have to do at least some of the household chores that keep her in such incredible shape, agree?
Wait to c our JoNathan’s orangutan t-shirt to mention in passing his Beavers Rock My World t-shirt that causes a double-take when worn by PW MD, to mention in passing the lettering he assembled on the refrigerator of our rock cabin that could have “sum” [sic] folk seeing red, agree?
Time to lighten up but why lose your marbles in the process, best of all her plan to tap into the source while holding the “feet to the fire” of the “beerocrats” [sic] looking for a handout not dependant on PW MD deciding to disappear into thin air, [scroll down in the last hyperlink to the naked figure walking thru the door in the Barbados house], although if I push things tT∞ close to the edge there can be no guarantee she will stick with me, the idiot that I am 4 not registering this plan of plans exactly where?
Knowledge is light, thinking outside the box, never, never would anyone with just the basic knowledge of mathematics question why there is no such thing as a “Perfect Circle” assuming of course they allowed their formal education to interfere with their learning, agree?
I am suggesting that u seriously consider preparing a writ seeking restitution from the University of Arizona for having contributed to “sum” [sic] degree in allowing u to simply blow steam, not to suggest that your farts couldn’t have us get rid of our dams, agree?
Surely u can understand that I have enough on my plate thinking about how to keep investment bankers, stock brokers and the likes at least as gainfully employed as they r today without u forcing me to think about all those who could follow in the footsteps of the Enron employees, agree?
Have u ever blown a Didgeridoo?
Please also bear in mind when mitigating your damages u will undoubtedly cause the rest of us logically minded human beings to pay up “big time” no doubt the university faculty will be seeking to apportion blame on anyone else possibly responsible for your sequencing having been interfere with?
U would surely agree each and every one of us is programmed right from the start, agree?
Be4 taking an ax to your “God”
[sic], ponder this communiqué
which I sent last evening to South Africa’s Minister of Finance,
So very careful am I in what I have to say, so easy to “shoot from the mouth” when u have nothing other than your reputation to lose, to mention little of at least one office of the FBI [Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION] copied on each one of my broadcasted communiqués each agent carrying a rocket propelled grenade in their hip pocket?
God forbid u were to be so ticked off with me that u decide to cut off the tail of my dog, Pypeetoe who had quite the close call when I negligently closed the door while entering the posh hotel atop Machu Picchu on his perfectly sculptured white and brown tail, nothing quite as dramatic to c blood pouring out of the tip of the tail belonging to a very happy “God” [sic], agree?
“4 all I know” [sic] u could be a spy, so difficult to gauge “friend from foe” in this “Dog eat God” [sic] world, agree?
No better time to be alive, however, than at this very moment in time when if u have just an ounce of a conscience, a particle of non-vacuum space between your ears u should be capable of enjoying the theatrics as I take great pleasure in beating the crap out of the rogue of rogues, agree?
So stop with your nonsense and lend me a hand by helping edit the draft communiqué I sent to your incredible dad earlier which I aim to post with your help on each and every message board of every public company traded on the stock markets throughout the world, agree?
The instant u get to your senses and realize that the game of life is like the game of chess, getting your opponent to play to your advantage so u will also realize that George W. Bush is not the “evil incarnate”, agree?
Moreover when submitting your “claim” my assuming u will be able to seek both compensatory as well as punitive damages from every single fricken person u name in your mindless complaint, u find it within your heart to make note that if this great President were to have told the people of the world the truth about what he inherited given the fact that Communist Clinton was having sex at the wheel while leaving the “pubic” [sic] with the impression that The Buck Stops Here then in all likelihood u and I would not be able to engage in this “dialogue”, balance essential, agree?
U surely well acquainted with my PW’s profound words,
“When the dialogue becomes tT∞ monologues it is the beginning of the end” [sic]?
This world would be far better off if women were on permanent PMS so that they wouldn't put up with any of the bullshit!
Don’t wait until morning be4 forwarding this missive to
each and every
Not to forget to at least offer the Feds some pot should they come tearing thru your living room, rip u to shreds, feed u to the dogs, be4 scattering your remains in a snake pit as u awake from this nightmare.
As my PW MD says,
“
Worst nightmare, u r either incompetent
Take your p.ick” [sic]!
With all the bull going on at this time, there being just a handful of folks possibly in the world as well informed as me in terms of the conspiracies that take place well below the ranks of the ruling elite, consider when last u heard of whole families here in the United States of America disappearing overnight, agree?
What would be your guess for the number of Peruvians gone
“missing” during the 8 years
To understand the “Mind of God” one must first understand at least the basic elements of Special Relativity followed by General Relativity and then accept that the most important mathematics has already been worked out, leaving u to do not that much more than at least listen very carefully to when my partner-wife Marie Dion opens her incredible mouth, agree?
Cheese?
Count your blessings young man, 4 if u r not part of the solution then u r part of the problem, agree?
Time u followed in the footsteps of those folks such as our new friend Lærke Skyum Blichfeldt a role model for the next generation very much dependant on u catching on real quick, agree?
While this is all surely nothing more than a “game” it is a deadly serious one, the folks I have chosen to do battle with at this time although very much paralyzed r anything but dead.
It takes much more than “big balls” to do what I am doing, a knowledge, far different to a “belief” in G-D, my driving force.
Take care,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:27 PM
To: fortune500@adelphia.net;
Subject: Court rules against Constitution!!!
How much longer will we as Americans sit back and watch this assault on our
constitutionally guaranteed rights continue?? The court decision below is a
direct blow to the constitution...but I guess this is what Americans want:
1)
SECONDS if they belive the suspect was dangerous, or that evidence could be
destroyed.
2) Upheld "informational roadblocks" where officers seek the public's help to
solve crimes. A man was arrested at such a stop for driving erratically.
3) Permitted drugs found in a suspects's car to be used as evidence after
federal agents dismantled his car at a border checkpoint.
4) Ruled lawful a suspects arrest next to his vehicle after drugs were found
inside his car. The court said it was not neccessary for a suspect to be inside
his car to have evidence used against him.
WELCOME TO NAZI AMERIGERMANY! YOUR PAPERS NOW! HEIL GEORGE!
Might as well remember: WE"RE AT WAR! So, you better turn over your
fingerprints, phone records, credit card bills, magazine subscriptions, email
transactions, and much, much more...ALL TO KEEP YOU SAFE!
Right?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KEEPING NAME PRIVATE CAN BE CRIME, COURT RULES
Ruling seen as win for police, defeat for privacy advocates
Bill Mears
CNN Washington Bureau
Tuesday, June 22, 2004 Posted: 10:25 AM EDT (1425 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court has again given police greater power to
stop and question suspects, ruling Monday that a Nevada cowboy could not refuse
to give his name to officers who tried to question him along a roadside.
The case was the fifth victory for law enforcement this term in cases involving
search and seizure by law enforcement.
The narrow 5-4 ruling was seen as a defeat for privacy advocates.
Larry "Dudley" Hiibel, the Nevada rancher at the center of the case, had become
a minor celebrity for those who believed he was standing up for his
constitutional rights.
He was arrested after he told a deputy that he didn't have to reveal his name or
show an ID during an encounter on a rural road in 2000. Hiibel was prosecuted,
based on his silence and fined $250. The Nevada Supreme Court sided with police
on a 4-3 vote.
In its ruling announced Monday, the justices upheld Hiibel's misdemeanor
conviction. Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said, "Asking
questions is an essential part of police investigation. In the ordinary sense a
police officer is free to ask a person for identification without implicating
the Fourth Amendment."
Kennedy noted that having identification has benefits to both police and
suspect. "Knowledge of identity may inform an officer that a suspect is wanted
of another offense, or has a record of violence or mental disorder," he wrote.
"On the other hand, knowing identity may help clear a suspect and allow the
police to concentrate their efforts elsewhere."
In a dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens said that because Hiibel was the target
of a police investigation, he "acted well within his rights when he opted to
stand mute."
Stevens said, "There is no reason why the subject of police interrogation based
on mere suspicion, rather than probable cause, should have any lesser
protection."
Monday's ruling was a follow up to a 1968 decision that said police may briefly
detain someone on reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing, without the stronger
standard of probable cause, to get more information, according to a report from
The Associated Press. Justices said that during such brief detentions, known as
Terry stops after the 1968 ruling, people must answer questions about their
identities.
Justices had been asked to rule that forcing someone to give police their name
violated a person's Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable searches and
the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
The court in previous weeks ruled for police in four other search and seizure
cases that tested the limits of police intrusions and privacy rights.
In the other cases the court:
believed the suspect was dangerous, or that evidence could be destroyed.
Upheld "informational roadblocks" where officers seek the public's help to solve
crimes. A man was arrested at such a stop for driving erratically.
Permitted drugs found in a suspect's car to be used as evidence after federal
agents dismantled his car at a border checkpoint.
Ruled lawful a suspect's arrest next to his vehicle after drugs were found
inside the car. The court said it was not always necessary for the suspect to
be inside his car to have evidence used against him.
Some legal
enforcement and the public.
"We have this idealistic notion in this country that we can live in kind of
splendid anonymity, we can walk around and be left alone," said Edward Lazarus,
a former Supreme Court clerk and author of a book on the justices. "And this
question really raises, in the post-9/11 era, the issue of whether that's
really true anymore."
According to an AP report, justices were told that 20 states have similar laws
to the Nevada statute upheld by the high court:
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Louisi
Mont
Island, Utah, Vermont and Wisconsin.
The case is Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of the state of Nevada,
03-5554.
