From: Gary S.
Gevisser
Sent:
To: Professor
Kelly, Scripps Research
Subject: DARK MATTER
Dear Professor and Doctor Kelly;
I found it rather interesting that you
have yet to return my phone call. You may recall not only did you and I enjoy
what I thought to be a rather worthwhile conversation the weekend before last
at the [Del Mar] Plaza albeit distracted by our dogs and a surfer dude
who I ended up spending the rest of the evening talking to but you and I had a
quick conversation later in the week. Certainly, I made it patently clear my
girlfriend was "just around
the corner." My dog is pretty but there is only so much one can do
with a dog, wouldn't you agree?
With that said, I don't want to steal your
thunder but I do want to make sure that you do in fact stay on track. I don't
have any certifications as I mentioned but I do make it my business to stay
responsive when need be. In other words I am well equipped to respond to fast
balls thrown at or near head. Deafening silences make me all the more weary.
Perhaps it had to do with me making it patently clear that I wouldn't sign a
confidentiality agreement, in which case why not show me the courtesy and let
me know that this is in fact your hang-up. Certainly, I think I demonstrated
enough "credibility"
that would have you thinking twice of me being someone that goes around and
around in circles, certainly I wouldn't let anyone yank my chain. Remember, my
bottoms up schooling? I think I covered with you why I think nature disposed of
our tails, never to sniff up “tTOo close” [sic], brown nosing to boot.
With that said, I believe I can continue
to make a contribution to your ongoing research. The fact that you haven't yet
been able to make "head or tail" of the "wave
which I never saw before" is not all that surprising. A
colleague of mine who does quite a bit of defense related work would probably
use the term "Frightening."
I have continued to ponder the data you
provided me and I would bet my last dollar that you being the "good professor" that you have
gone back and taken a much closer look at the data and I would bet my second
last dollar that there is exceedingly strong evidence that less intelligent
people are more susceptible to degenerative diseases than folks like yourself.
Remember I first begin my
With that said, I believe that you
shouldn't be focused on the "sad" nature of this finding
but rather you should be putting your butts into gear to think about how to
turn this into a positive, turn it on its head, as in Head Start.
As I explained to you in rather graphical
sports terms, it is all about "operating
in negative space" that it is in the open spaces that the game
is "one and lost". What you described
to me as the "conventional wisdom" of the
ruling elite of the researchers in this field is wisdom that I believe belongs
in the dark ages. The idea that the brain cells are essentially turning on
themselves driving them into nothing defies not only logic but it is counter to
the fact that we know most of matter out there is in fact "negative matter"
i.e. the energy remains but in another form.
More importantly, is the fact that I
believe if in fact I/WE, it was Mohammed
Well I believe we now have the proof. I
would be more than happy if you were to receive the "Natal Prozac Award" but please
don't take me for an idiot or for someone who cannot also stroke people right
assuming they play it straight.
With that said, I had told you that you
had yet another half hour of my time to get the most out of me and it will cost
you nothing. My sense of urgency is simple. Given what I believe to be absolute
hard evidence we should begin post haste to look at how the environment might
be affecting a child's IQ, that perhaps we are not born total genii or for that
matter total morons; that perhaps there are factors that go into the raising of
children which could have both a "drag" as
well as "pull"
effect.
In other words, how the parents' behavior
affects the neurons firing. Your
"quack
quack quack...the
attack must have come from the ocean"
was "refishing" [sic], different to "water causing rot"
although we could meet under the bridge, you know the one the Coastal Commission are most likely to
approve being widened but not if I can help it.
I am offering you a helping hand, at least
respond in kind. I learned a while ago how the fish rots from the head down.
My understanding is that you have a ways to go.
With that said, I will now refer you to
one of my 78 odd websites that we plan to launch over the next several weeks
www.nextraterrestrial.com or Next...Trial for short.
With that said, I will direct you to
recent email communications I had with Professor Klein of Stanford University.
Please understand I could have taken
things a little slower with this Professor but I am a rather busy person and I
simply don't have time to waste.
Unless I hear from you within the next 24
hours I will be posting "my findings"
up on one of our websites. I seem to remember telling you about, EmanANDdog.com
which despite your "strong mat-e-h" you had
trouble conjugating from right to left. Perhaps it was just the "whine
or simply distracted by your God resting" [sic].
Please don't take my assertive action to
mean that I don't respect your other conflicting schedules but I am always a
little weary of the academics especially when it comes to "postings" that tenure is the
essence of all things contrary to the teachings of Pythagoras.
Very truly yours,
Gary S. Gevisser
