From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:58 PM
To: Yasmine Martin
Cc: rest; Cityhall@delmar.ca.us'; Del Mar Times - Editor; Devin Standard
Subject: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants - Thomas Jefferson

Dear Yasmine – While preparing for a TV broadcasted meeting of the Del Mar City Councilmember meeting scheduled for 6 PM PST I hope to cover some ground with u, my hoping that the Del Mar City Council while focusing on problems I first spelled out in my Endless Universe letter to the Editor of the Del Mar Times do not get “tT∞” [sic] distracted by the masses tuned in to my missives not feeling anywhere near as sickened as the “ruling elite” not just here in southern California so out of control in their consumption that they have to import some half the gas deposits recently discovered in the Cuzco region of Peru, butt aware of the paralysis settling in around the world by those who usurp their limited authority.

The time now 5:42 PM PST my letting Del Mar’s mayor, Richard Earnest, know that I might be running a few minutes late and to proceed as usual providing his “best efforts” as I still have to shower, get rid of several layers of salt the result of twice today bathing in our rather filthy “oshon” [sic] which of course despite the runoff of pesticides from “rich chick” households that line the beach stretching back as far as the eye can see is not quite as disgusting as the “Uribamboo” [sic] river, agree?

Make no mistake tho, I am not one for each and every single one of us going back to living in bamboo huts, just the pigs like my Partner-Wife’s former husband Dr. JBS more aptly referred to as The Sperm Donor.

PW Marie Dion has suggested that our 88 year old friend Gene accompany me to tonight’s meeting, “Just to keep an eye on u” [sic].

I have yet to hear back from Gene who may be walking his wolf but I doubt even if Gene saw picking up dog poo as more rewarding than listening to a bunch of politicians clap themselves to death he would be as deliberate in spelling out “No” as Dr. John Pollard, also a resident of Del Mar, did so yesterday while providing me with this quote from Thomas Jefferson which I think u would agree states in one sentence what our worldwide water project is all about;

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants.

As u know there is always competition, usually the tyrants r the winners, the patriots r only patriots if they win, otherwise Shining Path, agree?

Nothing quite like an obvious truism, agree?

Earlier this afternoon I spoke with Mr. Devin Standard the executor of my worldwide estate, Devin knowing a thing

Or

tTOo about a number of things including the importance of the need to cut to chase in this “Dog eat God” [sic] world where even fish swimming upstream don’t have time to consider fully what it means to have sex in polluted waters, G-D DNA, to mention only in passing what it means to be up sh1ts creek without a paddle, not to suggest that my estate at this very moment in time is worth what my uncle David Gevisser “inherited” when Charles Englehard died from an overdose of Coke.

Cola-Coke and Pepsi r just 2 of the conglomerates operating around the 4 corners of the earth who I am quite certain will get the program.

Why not in between watching soccer take a look at the stuff written about the American Charles Englehard.

He was about to return to it in 1957 when, as he recounts, Englehard said: "No, I got more money than them mill people, and you're staying."

Englehard could well afford it. His vast precious metals empire was said to have controlled, among other things, the world supply of platinum. But his passion in life was salmon fishing, especially on the Cascapédia, where he kept three lodges for his family and guests: Chaleur, New Dereen and Lorne Cottage. Gilker became full-time manager of Camp Chaleur, which was reserved for Englehard's favorite guests. let me begin by repeating the first question I posited back on July 6^th that email titled, Tour de Aqua Calientes

He became a cherished friend of the Englehard family, frequently visiting their grand estate in Fair Hill, New Jersey, on business and social occasions. There he met the likes of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor and John and Jacqueline Kennedy.

Chapter 18 of The Diamond Invention makes more than simply interesting reading for those of us a little more familiar with Mr. Engelhard’s “addictions” his influence peddling text book reading at any Ivy League University attended by likes of John Kennedy the former President of the United States, his brother Robert F. Kennedy’s actions

Or

Should I say lack thereof during his visit to South Africa back in mid 1966 not exactly falling on deaf ears, especially as I, the ultimate insider, have begun in recent times to inform the not-so-illiterate masses of why instead of directing their anger at those here in the United States of America most responsible for their continued slavery to rather kick back take deep breaths enjoy the wind and breeze, smoke a joint if it will help them relax and watch ever so carefully tho as I “pick apart” those such as the Kennedy clan who for decades now have derived great satisfaction in exceeding the limits of their small authority, i.e. evil does not come in the form of a pointed tail

Or

Pitched fork, wouldn’t u agree Mr. Jeffrey R. Krinsk, Mrs. Jeffrey R. Krinsk, Mr.and Mrs. King Golden Esq., Ms. Dianna Henriques of The New York Times, Mr. Po-Li Pollak, Mr. Rabin of the Los Angeles Times, Mr. George Money Talks Hurst Esq. Mr. and Mrs. Hearst, Mr. David Gevisser, his son Mr. Mark Gevisser, Mr. Newel “Sorry” Starks, Ms. Vicky Sticky Schiff, Mr. Dan Weinstein, Mr. Mark Weinstein, Mr. Ron Burkle, former President of the United States of America Mr. Bill Clinton et al, so I detest.

To repeat excerpts of Chapter 18

The founder of Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals, Charles Engelhard, was a well-connected American entrepreneur who had inherited a small metal fabricating company from his father. In the late 1940s, he had journeyed to South Africa to make his fortune. South African mines had a surplus of gold, but government regulations prohibited the exporting of gold bullion from South Africa without permits from the central bank, which were very difficult to obtain. Great Britain, which still controlled the financial affairs of South Africa, wanted to retain as much gold as possible within the sterling bloc. Engelhard found a loophole through that regulation: while it was illegal to export gold bars, it was legal to export objets d'art made of gold. Engelhard formed a company called Precious Metals Development that bought gold from the mines and cast it in the form of statues and other religious items. Engelhard exported these religious objets d'art to Hong Kong, where they were melted down and turned back into gold bullion, which could then be sold on the free market. (This ploy was later used by Ian Fleming, who was a business partner of Engelhard, in his novel Goldfinger)

While living in Johannesburg, Engelhard became a close friend of Harry Oppenheimer. Both men were approximately the same age and came from the same German-Jewish background. Both men were born millionaires, who later owned and controlled their own family businesses. And both men also shared a passion for racehorses (at one point, Engelhard owned 250 thoroughbred horses). Oppenheimer invited Engelhard to join the board of Anglo-American Corporation, and for his part, Engelhard invited Oppenheimer to participate in a number of mutually profitable joint ventures.

The Justice Department investigators were especially interested in the relationship between Harry Oppenheimer and Charlie Engelhard. They theorized that Oppenheimer relied on Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals to provide the services, credit terms, and contacts necessary to keep its American clients from buying their synthetic diamond grit from General Electric. They concluded in a memo that "Oppenheimer turned to Engelhard to take up the GE challenge." Specifically, Oppenheimer had arranged for Engelhard's holding company, called Engelhard Hanovia, to become the American distributor for De Beers abrasive grits. "The idea was that grit sales needed a new 'American look,' with the old De Beers monopoly image less exposed," the lawyers noted. They concluded that the entire scheme was intended by De Beers to avoid "exposing gem monopoly to antitrust sanctions."

In reconstructing this complicated arrangement, the investigators found that it was based on a quid pro quo. In return for acting as an intermediary for De Beers, Engelhard received all the costs for setting up a Swiss company called Prometco, plus a guaranteed profit of 100,000 English pounds a year. It was a fairly lucrative deal for Engclhard, and it also accommodated his friend Oppenheimer.

The deal provided far-reaching benefits. In the mid- 1960s, Engelhard intervened on behalf of Oppenheimer to prevent the United States government from dumping its vast stockpile of industrial diamonds on the world market. Engelhard, who was one of President Lyndon Johnson's chief fund-raises, offered to buy up one and one-half million carats of diamonds from the stockpile on condition that the Government promise not to sell any more diamonds for five years. He then planned to resell the American diamonds to De Beers. Not only would Engelhard personally make a tidy profit from the exchange but as a Justice Department review notes, "The commitment by the United States not to sell any more of the stockpile would be for the very purpose of protecting the monopoly of the diamond syndicate." If the government entered into such an agreement, it would become increasingly difficult to bring an antitrust action against the monopoly at a later date. For this reason, the Justice Department vehemently protested the deal, and despite Engelhard's personal influence with President Johnson, its protest prevailed.

Engelhard had also begun to buy control of some important users of industrial diamond abrasives, including Supercut, Inc., then the third largest consumer of diamond grit in the United States, and Concut, Inc., a Midwest manufacturer of diamond tools and abrasive grinding wheels. These acquisitions provided Oppenheimer with leverage in the competitive battle, shaping up between General Electric and De Beers, for control of the synthetic market in America.

Just as the Justice Department was about to file antitrust actions, Engelhard relinquished its right to be exclusive distributor of De Beers' abrasive diamonds in the United States and devolved the distributorship to three industrial diamond dealers in New York, all of whom had close ties to De Beers. Engelhard arranged for Oppenheimer to buy a controlling interest in his far-flung empire, since he had no male heirs to take over. To do this, Oppenheimer set up HD Development Corporation, which was owned by Oppenheimer and Anglo-American.

Behind this whirl of corporate maneuvers, Justice Department lawyers suspected an attempt by De Beers to carve up the American market for both synthetic and natural diamond abrasives. According to their theory, Oppenheimer used Engelhard's companies in America as a cover under which De Beers could organize distributorships for its products, staff them with selected executives, and nominally give them to supposedly independent dealers. Proving the case in court, however, was a far more difficult matter, since when Engelhard was involved in the diamond business, Oppenheimer owned no part of it; when Oppenheimer bought control of Engelhard, it was no longer directly in the diamond business.

Moreover, as the grand 'Jury investigation gathered momentum, Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals severed all its visible connections with the diamond business. It not only disposed of the abrasive manufacturers it had bought, but locked away in its vaults all the records of its previous dealings with De Beers, its subsidiaries and its agents. Harry Oppenheimer and other South African directors of Engelhard, who were also directors of De Beers and Anglo-American Corporation, stopped attending the board of director meetings of Engelhard in the United States. The concern was that they would be subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury. The Justice Department heard from one of its sources that "the General Counsel for Engelhard ... had a fit" when this possibility was divulged to the American members of the board. Justice Department lawyers also received reports that the " [Baron] Rothschild on the De Beers' board, upset at being told that he could not come to the U.S. because of the diamond investigation, has now resigned from the De Beers board"; and that "Harry Oppenheimer is extremely upset at not being able to come to the U.S."

In order to accommodate Oppenheimer and the other South African directors, Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals agreed to hold board meetings in London and elsewhere outside the United States. In September of 1974, Engelhard directors flew to London and met with Oppenheimer and a number of De Beers executives. According to a secret justice Department source, who had access to that meeting, there was an intriguing discussion between Oppenheimer and a top executive of Engelhard, of the implications of the investigation. According to the September 27, 1974, justice Department report, the executive guaranteed Oppenheimer that there would be no criminal indictments of De Beers' personnel resulting from the diamond grand jury investigation. Moreover, "the executive demanded a substantial increase in his salary [because] ... he would be required to have closer dealings with De Beers."

This raised the possibility that the diamond cartel and its allies might have found some way of intervening in the antitrust division. In a previous antitrust case involving the ITT corporation, President Nixon had blatantly attempted to prevent the antitrust division from pressing its suit. On August 4, 1974, the Justice Department received information that the "De Beers organization is a large contributor to both political parties and should this investigation get to a stage where cases were actually filed [the antitrust division] would probably receive much political pressure." The informant also disclosed that one major diamond dealer in New York was in "constant contact" with Harry Oppenheimer and was somehow relaying to him "information on the progress of this antitrust investigation." The diamond dealer in question was further alleged by this source to have "arranged the meeting for Harry Oppenheimer with John Kennedy when Kennedy was President-elect ... at the Carlyle Hotel," and to have served as an intermediary between Oppenheimer and American concerns in a number of deals.

While this group of antitrust lawyers was at work trying to elaborate the criss-crossing web of corporate ownership among firms that dominated the distribution and sales of diamond grit, a second team of lawyers was actively investigating an alleged conspiracy by De Beers to control the market for drilling stones. These industrial diamonds, ten to twenty times the size of abrasive grit, are crucially important for drilling for oil and other minerals. A single petroleum drilling bit, in which the block-shaped diamonds are inlaid in the metal cutting surface, may require more than $20,000 worth of diamonds; and without diamond drill stones, it would be practically impossible to drill many offshore and deep oil wells.

Unlike diamond grit, drill stones cannot be economically synthesized, and therefore the drilling industry is heavily dependent for its diamond drilling bits on the natural stones excavated from the De Beers-controlled mines in Africa.

In tracing through the subpoenaed records of the drilling companies in the United States in the early seventies, the antitrust lawyers found that a single American company and its subsidiaries supplied most of the diamonds for petroleum drill bits: the Christensen Diamond Product Company. Moreover, through informants and other sources, they learned that Christensen and his company had a long-standing involvement with the Oppenheimer interests.

Frank L. Christensen, a former football player from Detroit, had built up during the 1950s a firm that specialized in providing diamond-cutting ties to the automotive industry. When he visited Johannesburg, he developed a friendship with E. T. S. Brown, a robust De Beers executive, who headed its Industrial Diamond Division. Ted Brown, as he was called, spent considerable time showing Christensen around South Africa and he soon found in the ex-football star the sort of hard-driving entrepreneur he had been looking for to expand De Beers' sales in the United States. Brown's division had just developed a specially treated diamond that was especially efficient as a drilling stone, and he encouraged Christensen to use it to make drilling bits for the petroleum industry. Since De Beers itself could not operate in America, Brown began channeling the better quality bits to Christensen's firm, which rapidly increased its share of the American market.

In 1960, Brown made Christensen an offer he apparently could not refuse. A De Beers subsidiary in Luxembourg, called Boart International S.A., would buy a 50 percent share of Christensen's stock; working together, Christensen and De Beers would dominate the drilling business throughout the world. Christensen agreed, and in conjunction with Brown, who was also managing director of Boart International, he bought shares in other drilling contract companies in the United States and Venezuela. By 1970, Christensen and his silent partners at De Beers controlled well over 50 percent of the petroleum drilling business in the United States; through subsidiaries his firm also attained a dominant position in most other kinds of large-scale drilling industries all over the world. After subpoenaing a host of witnesses before the grand jury, the Justice Department concluded that Christensen and De Beers had acted in a "conspiracy ... to suppress competition among themselves, to require and increase consumption. of De Beers processed diamond drill stones, and to fix, maintain and stabilize world market process for such diamonds." A Justice Department analysis noted that "a key feature of the plan has been the formation of a worldwide network of companies 'Jointly owned by Boart and Christensen Diamond Products to consume De Beers processed diamonds ... [and] the acquisition of stock interests in Longyear and Boyles Bros., two of the largest consumers of diamond drill bits in the United States, and the foreclosure of the substantial purchase of diamond drill bits by these competitors to competitors." Since ownership of these companies was concealed through a tangle of corporations registered in Luxembourg and the Netherlands, the Justice Department concluded: "Much of this conduct was done so as to be secret and misleading, and much was done with full knowledge that there was grave risk of violating U.S. antitrust laws."

While the Justice Department lawyers were proceeding in 1971 to place the final pieces in their case against De Beers and its American associates, they learned of a startling new development. De Beers had relinquished its entire interest in Christensen Diamond Products by having its Boart International subsidiary sell back to Christensen Diamond Products all the stock that it owned in the company. This timely reorganization effectively undercut the entire antitrust case by legally divorcing De Beers from the American company, the main target of the long grand Jury investigation. Even though one of Christensen's major shareholders warned the Justice Department that the purpose of this sudden move by Oppenheimer was to avoid a protracted antitrust suit, and that "after the exchange of stock and rearrangement on the corporate structures ... De Beers would still control Christensen Diamond Products," there was little that the Justice Department could do. As one of the antitrust lawyers on the case explained to me, "After all, the remedy we had been proposing all along was to compel De Beers to sell its stock in Christensen, and when it did it of its own accord, it left us without much ground for proceeding against it."

In the end, the Justice Department had to settle for a token victory. Two distributors of diamond grit, Anco and DAC, both of whom had their De Beers distributorships devolved on them by Engelhard, were indicted for price-fixing. On April 8, 1975, both firms pleaded nolo contendere to charges, and received inconsequential fines, $30,000 for DAC and $20,000 for Anco. Both distributors and a De Beers subsidiary in Ireland entered into a consent judgment that enjoined them in the future from fixing the price of diamond grit in America, allocating territories or entering conclusive bids. Since, however, the vast majority of diamond grit was manufactured synthetically by 1975, and De Beers had no real monopoly over the supply of this synthetic grit, the court injunction had meant little to De Beers. Even without the injunction, De Beers already had to compete for its share of the diamond grit market in America.

In winning this battle, the Justice Department abandoned the war to break the De Beers stranglehold over gems and strategically important drilling stones, the very areas which have not been replaced by synthetic diamonds. The conspiracy case thus ended with the diamond invention intact.

Yasmine, may I also suggest u take the time read more about the unholy alliance between the South African Oppenheimer family and the German Nazi Military Machine, the likes of my incredible father, Mr. Bernard Nathan Gevisser, yet to be given anywhere near the credit they deserve but have never sought while risking life and limb bombing the crap out of those Nazi bastards, agree?

And to think that their efforts were all for nought considering how American Charles Englehard in alliance with the South African Oppenheimers have managed still to this day to enslave not only the peoples of color within the boundaries of South Africa but all those toiling the soil in this rather wicked industry accurately referred to as The Diamond Invention, agree?

So help me G-D just a matter of moments in the history of time be4 this ugliness is ripped apart, those at the top of this pyramid should take note at the speed in which information is today being transmitted and do the SMART thing and not wait for a kid of color knocking on their door just asking politely at this time for their FAIR share, agree?

Getting back ever so quickly to that first question, “Had Ken Blanchard taken u up on your offer to visit Aqua Calientes what would have been your most optimistic view of such an outcome?”

Later,

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Yasmine Martin [mailto:ymartin@perurail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:27 PM
To: gsg@sellnext.com
Cc: Mark Culp - FBI
Subject:

Dear Gary

I was away for the past week, traveling on the railway lines, this is the first email, I have ever received from you, therefore not too sure, which email and blind copies

you are referring too. Please send me any questions you have, however this week being the final week of the Copa America, and Peru being host country, will be out

checking operations.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

Kind Regards

Yasmine

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 5:59 PM
To: gsg@sellnext.com
Cc: rest; Yasmine Martin; Mark Culp - FBI
Subject: Next Symposium {:}...truth...{:}

Dear Guys and Gals – Some, but not all of u were blind copied on this missive which I sent out earlier to Yasmine Martin, the general manager of Peru Rail.

I have not heard back from Ms. Martin nor do I expect to, at least not within the next 24 hours as I go about posting on websites such as this my “credibility”.

There r not many people I know who have been fortunate to blessed with 2 incredible parents who most of all guided me to be proud of my own accomplishments bearing in mind both my mother and father while still in their teens had at least from my perspective accomplished the “impossible”, my mother a “household name” and my father while serving as wingman to what many believe to be the best fighter-bomber pilot of the Second World War bombed the crap out of the Nazi bastards.

One does not need to take “my word” on anything I say since given the Digital Age everything can “verified” at least more than at any time in the history of our species.

It all comes down to the “truth” which in English we often attribute to “proof”, the better the evidence the better the proof.

I am well aware of the fact that no one can force anyone to do something they don’t think is in their best interests even when the “evidence” is overwhelming how much “good” will result for the simple reason that no one likes to be told what to do and perhaps more importantly it would be arrogant for anyone to assume they know what is in the best interests of the next person which is why I simply make it a point of suggesting things and then getting the hell out of the way, 180 degrees different to the intellectual elite who “govern” organizations such as the Democratic Communist Party here in the United States of America.

I have begun to “plant seeds” around the globe preparing folks to at least seriously consider our “water project” which while uplifting to every single human being I have “run it by” is clearly unnerving to those hell bent on milking their gravy train from now until eternity even the so-called “spiritual” amongst us rather greedy especially when it comes to the race of dying the richest person in the grave, agree?

Now despite having thrown my “hat in the ring” not every single literate human being on this planet may take me seriously at this time which is why I can understand to “sum” [sic] degree why they would remain deafeningly silent, but I doubt they will remain so for much longer given again my ability to broadcast my “credibility”, such skills and knowledge the result of paying very careful attention from a very young age, my mother often commenting how I never spoke a word until I was 3, only those acquainted with me in very recent times would suggest since then, “This obnoxious blithering idiot never stopped.”

And as u all know with “credibility” comes “access” something I have discussed to some degree but perhaps not as eloquently as if my extraordinary mother was editing my missives, then again not all that many of u r that familiar with Zena Gevisser to mention just in passing why someone like Robert F. Kennedy would have my mother “chauffeuring” him around South Africa when he visited in 1966

Or

Why someone very possibly a whole lot more powerful, certainly Aristotle Onassis didn’t need my mother’s fortunes to  buy and sell the disgusting Kennedy clan given what he cash he rounded off on a daily basis, the likes of Onassis certainly not a saint but someone even the mafia would trust in business, agree?

And when it comes to trust u will have to just take my word on it for the time being I am one Gevisser whose word is my bond.

More important than anything else at this time is for u all to know I am very serious about not interfering with the process of each one of u in your neck of the woods doing the right thing to ensure the bulletproof, watertight plan to solve all of the water problems of the world will work as long as we each help another along, which is not to suggest that we all need to get along at this time since I think it would be fair to say that while each of us may have a very similar long term vision our short term needs make us all simply relatively greedy.

Not everything tho, is relative, there enough compelling evidence which I have only relatively recently begun broadcasting that has the rapacious shaking in their fricken boots knowing full well the youth who r all our futures r getting increasingly with the program.

Be that as it may I look forward to hearing from each of u as we usher in a new world era based essentially on the truth, the better the evidence the better the proof.

G-D bless, and may G-D continue to bless our great President George W. Bush.

gg