From: Gary S.
Gevisser [
Sent:
To:
Cc: rest
Subject: "Jews dnA Chess" [sic].
Professor Brown,
I am taking a quick break from “horsehunting”
[sic] having a little earlier returned from looking at a house with a decent
view of the ocean here in Old Del Mar without, thank G-D, a view of the Del Mar
“Where the turf meets the surf” racetrack and glanced at post 630
on the eRaider.com, The Buck Stops
Here message board.
I think you would agree that poster TCO deserves his too month break
but what about Mr. George "Give me a break" Hurst Esq?
True to my word I have copied u on a number of my recent
emails but none more important than the one I sent Di
My computer continues to “act up”
but at least I am sumwhat “up & running”
and of course you would be happy to know that given the access I have to the
very best cardiologists in the world if one day I needed Viagra there would be
no need to beg, so how is the “fatso” [sic]?
Would u be interested in receiving an
advance copy of Part 8 of the 8 part mini series that will reach the World Wide
Wait no later than 911 and while u r thinking about that and don’t tell
me u have the munchies as u prepare for Yom Kippur [Day of Atonement] do u
think Mr.
With regard to the subtitle, I think you
would agree that all
Jews play chess one way or another?
I have come to understand that players fall into two
categories:
Some play by moving game pieces about on an 8 X 8 grid following
time-honored, changeless rules.
Others play by moving assets about on an
international playing field following their own constantly
changing rules.
Even if you “suspect” in your post #611
none of the 3 companies you have “run” which is what I believe you meant
when you said, “I have run companies three X
in my life” [sic] would impress me, please be so gracious as to provide
the other 2 “temporary” enterprises you have been involved in
besides for eRaider.com that appears to me to be on its last legs,
detailing their condition when you emerged “out of the starting gates”,
spelling out what condition if any they were in when you left and if in fact
they were dead explain as best you can how they were “humanely etcherized"
[sic]?
And then let me and my “inner circle”
play with what you mean by “temporary.”
Your last paragraph,
“No, I am not willing to take a polygraph test about
anything, I do not consider them reliable. If there were a reliable lie test, I
would still insist that you establish a basis before agreeing to the test: that
the truth matters or that there is any reason to believe I might have lied.
Without either of those, the test seems pointless”
sparks me recalling one of your trusted colleagues on
“The Puck Stops
Here” [sic] believing you had in fact changed an earlier post which you
vociferously denied to mention little of r u suggesting when you write, “: that the truth matters” that
there are instances where the truth does not matter or should you have
placed a “sic”
immediately thereafter so as to denote sum type of error?
Following this email I will place it as a hyperlink on your
website and perhaps TCO left you a private number where he can be contacted in
order to lend support, or better yet why not place a call to “Melvin
Weiss” [sic] of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes and Lerach assuming he
isn’t tying up the phone posting another of his ridiculous postings?
No one should be to disappointed in what
I have to say unless of course u r part of the “status quo” crowd
who don’t necessarily look for a mandate from the people before bending
or 4 that matter, breaking the rules, the days of “Tom [Brokaw], Dick
[Cheney] and Harry [Potter]” playing it “fast &
loose” now drawing to a close, the world assuredly endless.
What goes around comes around, no one in
their right mind would really want to rule anyone which is why the Digital Age
is, at least from my perspective, nothing short of a, “G-D Send.”
How else would u explain my rather
impressive record, never being though a “big at the
trough” [sic], yet
having such incredible access to information from a rather young age to now be
in the pivotal position of fixing the
biggest numbers racket ever invented by man, and to then deal with the
overpopulation problem is a synch.
Number, Professor Idiot, is the essence
of all things, good or evil, rules to be examined very carefully in this
“topsy turvy” world about to go “bust” leaving folks
like me in the “pound seats”, agree?
Let me know if u r interested in hearing about the rules of
cricket.
