From: Gary S. Gevisser
To: Jeff Rabin – Los Angeles Times
Sent: Fri 9/12/2003 3:40 PM PST
Subject: Follow up to "Ethics Inquiry Urged..."

 

 

Mr. Rabin, I doubt that you have heard of me but you can be assured there are more folks out there besides for Judge Jack Weinstein who have found what I have to say “above average” in terms of credibility to mention little of my prescient timing. I am also probably above average in terms of intelligence and my intelligence gathering techniques are in fact slowly being “leaked out” all part of my strategy to market the book I am now completing titled, Manager Minute One, a take-off of the business book, One Minute Manager that mostly ended up on folks’ bookshelves serving as book ends, not more than a few pages read, at least that is my opinion.

 

To cut to the chase, I have “smoking gun evidence” of political corruption at the highest levels of the California State Government, specifically the rigging of the last Gubernatorial elections by non other than the folks you first wrote about back, I believe it was, in February 7th, 2000.

 

Since I don’t have my credit card handy to purchase the full article you penned, “Ethics Inquiry Urged: Election: D.A. declines to file charges in probe of Han camp’s role in hit ads paid for by Indian tribes, but suggests city might take civil action… Within day, one of those tribes, the Soboba Band of Mission Indians, sent $100,000 to a San Francisco political consulting firm to produce mailers that attacked [James K. Hahn]’s opponent, [Antonio Villaraigosa], as lenient on child pornographers and sexual predators. Hahn defeated Villaraigosa in the June mayoral runoff…” I cannot say for certain it contained the name Dan Weinstein but I would be most surprised if it didn’t although I wouldn’t be surprised if there was no reference to the Wetherly Capital Group, Dan being the co-managing director.

 

Suffice to say if you interested in getting to the truth of these matters, the implications I can assure you are far more significant than Watergate which was nothing more than a bungled burglary by a bunch of amateurs followed up with a cover up which were it not for the tapes Nixon would likely have got away “Scotch free” [sic], and I think most seasoned pros doubt the existence of “deep throat” very possibly a figment of those reporters’ imagination or possibly their wives-girlfriends, agree?

 

I have painstakingly gone about protecting myself and those close to me by being very careful in terms of how I have gone about handling the evidence letting “my opponents” know that their best course of action is to plead “insane” or should I say that when I get “in the stand” [sic] their defense lawyers would have me agreeing that I must be “mad.”

 

And of course I am, especially when you consider the incredible life I lead without a “care in the world, brilliant and beautiful family, two dogs, blah blah” but no picket fence.

 

I have also though this thing called “conscience”. Other than my fingerprints being on the original documents you wont’ find a single shred of documentation in my possession that would be construed by any court in the world as, “self serving” which is not to say the perpetrators of these crimes haven’t been hard at work trying to “cover up their track, cut & paste, shred if need be” but the reality is that there is nothing they can do about it given how methodical I was in ferreting them out in the first place.

 

The axiom, “you make your money in real estate at the time of purchase” has taught me a thing or two but nothing quite like being first out of the starting blocks as long as the race is only a few meters giving my rather short, but pretty strong legs, the spring, not really wanting to see my legs chopped off below the knew, the site of blood makes me queasy.

 

Should you be interested in discussing these matters further please do not hesitate to reply, the sooner the better.

 

Gary S. Gevisser