Message
672
SUBJECT: Re: Hat Trick, an honest
Hat Trick
SENDER: dogtTOo
POSTED:
A REPLY TO: 671 by AaronBrown
Professor, you
may think the more you "duck & dive" the
more it might help your "love handles"
butt you are fortunately, unfortunately very much mistaken.
By the way to
you know much about Dr. Syd Cohen, my father having served as his “wingman” on
several occasions during WWII, who later became one of the founders of the Israeli Air Force?
The fortunate part is that you have given me more time to prepare the
telemarketing script contained within Part 8 of the 8 part mini series that I
began sending out to Di
Back in the mid to late 1980s I helped run a marketing-publishing company that
specialized in the Insurance industry and although our telemarketers didn’t
always wear a suit to work there were more than a handful of them who probably
earned more back then selling m
Naturally, it is possible that the other 2 companies you have been involved
with that you refuse to provide us any details “to speak of” may have you
continuing to “live it up” i.e. a stipend of sorts, not quite like the
dividends or “constructive dividends” a man like your one partner Stoller may
or may not “be entitled to” possession you know being 9/10ths of the law.
I assume Stoller hasn’t been idiotic to put any more money into eRaider.com or
any other business venture you were to propose.
If, however, “
Just in case there are new viewers to this website below is a hyperlink that
will take them my postings 669 & 670:
I will come back to this one question about David J. "Polie" Pollak
helping u make up your mind about meeting Mr.
Repeating,
"Since u haven’t heard of
Assuming that Polie Pollak did in fact meet the Clintons at their private
residence in upstate New York a week or so ago and Polie were to provide u with
a comfort level that his college mate
The reason for the "sic" is that I misspelled Polie's "nickname."
Devin and I are planning a conference call with Polie this coming Wednesday and
instead of a knee-jerk “no”
to being on that conference call think about how much you would be able to tell
your avid followers to mention little of your finance students from the
Yeshiva, how, despite your body odor, and remember this is simply my opinion,
you have m
And while you are at it, given the fact that you are on first name terms with
the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service would you please provide me
with his telephone number.
I assume since he is a public figure and that your relationship is not of a
personal nature, i.e. he is not enamored with your "briefs"
i.e. the number you have for him will not have me being given the "run around."
In a matter of minutes I will be sending a Mr. Merrick Wolman an email. He is
the nephew of Sol Kersner someone you possibly haven't heard of, as well.
And of course if your "filtering
system" prevents you from receiving a "hot copy" of that email I
will place it for all your viewers to see in "Jew course" [sic] on
this website which reminds me that no one has yet responded to my latest
posting on the Melvyn
Weiss’ Shareholder Rights message board.
God forbid you were to make any further moronic insights in to points I have
made so crystal clear in terms of the French water conglomerate, Vivendi's hand
in the rigging of the Gubernatorial elections that had me once again in the
"pound seats", my track record to mention little of the financial
resources I would bring to bear on the likes of you if you were to be so
idiotic as to make just one foul move, to mention little of my Curriculum Vitae
becoming more and more self evident as your pitiful career implodes.
And of course you are familiar these days with how my wife’s former husband,
Dr. JBS, a year ago to the day I posted message number 1161 on your website,
tried to bait me into a fist fight and just 3 days later, on September 11th,
while obviously still very “pumped up” went down to the Criminal Courts in
downtown San Diego and filed a “false &
misleading” criminal complaint against me that resulted in him being given a
Temporary Restraining Order affecting my ability to be with my wife when she
had custody of her two children, to mention little of his description of me, 40
years of age, 180 pounds in weight and 5 foot 11 inches tall to mention little
of him seeing me “day in & day out”
for a decade or so.
By now you should now that at the time I was 45 years of age, 140 pounds in “top
flight” condition and no more than 5 foot 8 inches tall. I have though been
doing my Pilates and so I might have stretched sumwhat, nothing worse than
those who “shave the truth”
and of course you have heard of the Epilady and don’t
respond by telling me that your wife never shopped for one at Bloomingdales, my
point here is to give you enough leeway to go off on another of your tangents,
rather than the address the substantively issues.
The point I am making by bringing up this so-called “personal
matter” that ultimately had my wife and I celebrating along with Mr.
It almost goes without saying, should there be just the slightest scratch to
me, my loved ones and/or any of my properties you can be rest assured, you and
your partners, would be in on the Top Ten suspects.
Good Day.
Gary S. Gevisser
Cc:rest
