From: Gary S. Gevisser c/o
Sent:
To: Walter Pinkerton Esq.
Cc: rest;
devinstandard@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Transcript...---..."Was Marie correct in what she
heard?"...---... You are
fired!
Walt
- I am using Marie's Yahoo email account.
I
have now heard the message you left earlier on the answering machine here at
You
are fired.
You
are to inform Judge Bloom immediately.
Leave
it to me inform Ted Kimball's law firm.
Make
certain when providing Judge Bloom with any expl
Furthermore,
I will filing a complaint with the appropriate
authorities of your gross negligence or culpability take your pick!
Gary
S. Gevisser
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: 'Walt Pinkerton'
Cc:
Subject: RE: Transcript...---..."Was Marie correct in what she
heard?"...---...
Your
continued refusal to answer my simple but rather important question is
increasingly troubling.
Again,
“Was Marie correct in
what she heard?”
Recapping:
You called earlier today and left a message on the answering machine over at
357 Parish Lane, our second rented residence here in Del Mar, stating, I understand
very clearly perhaps not in so many words that,
“I
never came across in the email
To
repeat the last paragraph of that 1241 word
email prior to ending with the words, “Good luck”:
You now have our permission to try settle this case
so that we can stay the remainder of the lease not to forget that our one dog
is now with our friend Gene and our Italian greyhound is mostly at the Cliff
House our other RENTED residence here in Del Mar.
What
exactly prevents you from answering my simple but rather important question
bearing in mind your reply to that 1241 rather well worded communiqué spelling
out a number of troubling matters to both Marie and me?
To
repeat your “reply” email to me that I received later yesterday at
…Based
upon your recent e-mail to me I will not explore settlement and await the
court's decision…
[Word count 234]
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: 'Walt Pinkerton'
Cc:
Subject: RE: Your Case
First,
answer my very clear question, “Was
Marie correct in what she heard?”
-----Original
Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Your Case
Please
advise me if you are willing to vacate the premises by
Please
advise me ASAP on your position in this regard.
Best
Regards,
Walter
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:09 AM
To: Walt Pinkerton
Cc:
Subject: RE: Your Case
I
understand you called my wife,
Was
Marie correct in what she heard?
Ps – I am very busy right now
on other very important matters of the day but please don’t let that stop you
from getting back to me ASAP.
[Word
count 90]
-----Original
Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Your Case
Dear Gary:
I spoke
with Kristen Connor regarding settlement. Her terms are that you vacate
the premises by
Please
consider and advise.
Best
regards,
Walter
-----Original
Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Transcript
I will
contact Kristen Connor to discuss settlement. Please advise me re: terms.
I did not
threaten you I informed you that Ms. Connor had communicated to me regarding your
e-mails and their content.
The cost
for the transcript is for the preparation of same and the cost is not known in
advance of the trial proceedings because length is not then known.
Please
contact me to discuss settlement terms.
Best
Regards,
Walter
-----
Original Message -----
From: Gary S.
Gevisser
To: 'Walt Pinkerton'
Cc: Devin
Standard
Sent:
Subject: RE: Transcript
My instructions were clear to you. Proceed to settle.
Second, I do not appreciate you being “threatened with a view to
intimidate me” that I “should be mindful” of my actions so that I “avoid
litigation” instituted by Greedy regarding “alleged defamation.”
Third, the fact that you didn’t inform me that there would be
“additional money” to type up the transcript seems “par for the course.”
Fourth, unless I hear from you otherwise, i.e. you get with the
program, I will begin instituting “legal action” to protect both my
constitutional rights to free and accurate speech, my pocket book as well as
right to do the right thing and the smart thing which is also the right thing
and broadcast once again my “findings”.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Transcript
The $636
was for the reporter's time at trial. The additional money is for her to
type up the transcript.
I have
received the reply to our brief on the restrictive covenent
issue. I will drop this in the mail to you today along with Ms. Connor's
fax to me concerning your
Based upon
her recent correspondences I think you should be mindful of your actions so
that you avoid litigation instituted by Beckham regarding alleged
defamation. If you would like to discuss this matter with me please
contact me at your convenience.
Based upon your recent e-mail to me I will not explore settlement
and await the court's decision. I anticipate a decision in this matter on Friday or
next Monday. I will be out of the office from
Best
regards,
Walter
-----
Original Message -----
From: Gary S.
Gevisser
To: 'Teri Holden'
Cc: Walter E. Pinkerton, Jr. Esq.
Sent:
Subject: RE: Transcript
I send in my response email to Walt this
morning “Yes, I will pay those additional monies…” but why wasn’t I
advised in the first place that the $636 I paid at the end of the trial was
just the first installment?
[Word
count 42]
-----Original
Message-----
From:
Sent:
To: gsg@sellnext.com
Subject: Transcript
The
transcript for you hearing will be ready in two weeks. It will cost
$528.50 to order.
Teri
S. Holden