From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 7:38 PM PT
To: Simon
Subject: RE: …
Hi SI…,
May I suggest
that you do something which I assume you have already done which is to report
just another very possible quack to the medical association and if you really
believe you have been wronged and can provide the evidence that I assume
includes possibly a videotape why wouldn’t you make it very public by setting
up a blog and give anyone and everyone including the entire X family the
opportunity to respond?
There is
much more to the “method to my madness” including very carefully thought through
logical thought processing and once you get your arms around what I have been
doing to get folks to focus exclusively on the one and only corruption of the DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel from which each and every
corruption over the past 100+ years has stemmed so you will stop wasting time
and energy addressing any other symptoms of all the worlds ills.
What I have
found is that everyone can logically figure out that the DAAC is an institution that can be so very easily dismantled but
once they conclude that dispensing with the DAAC impacts negatively their own corruption that affords them to
live better at least for now than their peers then they wont even bother
mentioning to their peers the Diamond Invention let alone how I can explain why
the DAAC allowed it to be written
and what is missing.
In other
words it won’t surprise me in the least if I don’t hear from you again as you
go insane each day looking yourself in the mirror finding signs of your
self-deception written in between every line on your face but if I do please
have the intellectual honesty to first make a very healthy financial
contribution to my “social cause” prior to the
DeBeers-Dollar becoming worthless.
Regards,
Ps – The telephone number you picked
up from that one time ad I ran back in 1989 in the South African
Sunday Times that attracted a very significant number of folks including the
South African Secret
[Word count
529]
From: Simon
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 6:52 AM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: ….
At 25-08-2006 16:30,
You have my word that unless I get your permission whatever
we discuss will remain “in strictest confidence and is not for
publication.”
I know X who is
an attorney working for X.
X and I haven’t spoken in years, not that we were ever close friends.
What is the nature of your “unpleasantness”.
Hi Gary, sorry for the delay after contacting you a couple of weeks ago.
Thank you too for the brief info on the X family.
I am interested in a some of the family background after I had been treated by
X's eldest brother, XX who is a psychiatrist here close to
However the treatment I received from him earlier this year for my anticipated
temporary low mood was unconventional to the point of strangeness.
This treatment was not only counterproductive but seemed to me to produce
outcomes which were entirely negative with no redeeming positive aspects.
Furthermore, it seemed to me that the treatment was not much designed to
contain any therapeutic benefit. I have to say that I never encountered
this sort of thing before.
It struck me that there might be some significant problems of behaviour or
personality lurking behind this which might make him go along such a seemingly
non-therapeutic path.
Certainly, having a distinguished father and therefore probably being neglected
during his upbringing would leave its mark and shape one's personality.
But what I encountered seems to be even stranger than what might have produced
from an unusual upbringing.
Suffice it to say that XX will not be on my Christmas card list this year.
If you are willing to advise me then I would be interested to know your
views. If it's ok with you, I think it might be more useful to phone as
email does not make it easy to interact.
In one of your web pages (love the web site - very crazy and yet very serious)
you show an advert of yours with a phone number 213-453-6471. Can I use
this to contact you?
Rgds
SI…