From:
Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To:
Cc: rest;
Subject:
FW: Freedom of the Press...stir my juices...---...
Mark – Winn’s response below is what I
would use if not as a teaser to get people of all ages, particularly those
whose formal education has not interfered with their learning, to attend a
unique and universal seminar on “risk assessment”,
I would use it almost certainly in the introduction.
His persistence in ignoring the irrefutable “smoking gun proof” of political corruption in my
possession leading to the highest levels of the Democratic Party versus
unsubstantiated criminal wrongdoing by those most likely not buttering his
bread thinking he can “stir my juices” by
stating rather categorically that I “have concluded”
without ever coming close to being so devoid of logical thought possessing to
suggest that, “Mssrs. Bush, Cheney, Romsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc. are such angels”,
is the sort of stuff that invigorates incorruptible
grass roots organizations forming around the world at light-G-D-Speed.
So important to take one’s time given how time
stands still at that awesome speed of 10.8 billion meters per second, in
picking apart the “sly English”
to mention little of Winn’s continued failure as the past and the future
all come “to-get-her” [sic] in the present, to get a dialogue going
involving me with this “straight-shooter, worldly and honest guy… served as a consultant
to the Federal Reserve Bank, and in particular, Paul Volker and
To recap:
Winn put to this supposedly “straight-shooter..”
my rather important question that cuts through all the bs, “Are
Certificates of Insurance included in the Money Supply numbers…”
And the response Winn got
at least 2 weeks ago was the following:
“No. It makes no sense.
In the first case, there are multiple measures of money supply. In
addition, monetary policy can and sometimes does target these monetary
aggregates, but also can and often does target levels and trends in interest
rates (primarily affecting short rates and only indirectly long rates through
inflationary expectations).
Money supply is in concept a way to think about transactional balances, not
other forms of wealth.”
Mark, even someone such as Winn will inevitably
start to lose his voice as people like yourself pick up on his, in my humble
opinion, retarded tactics of blowing smoke in the
face of overwhelming logical thought processing, bearing in mind again Winn is
allowed a voice because of again, in my humble opinion, he provides a pretty
decent appearance to the mostly “brainne dead”
[sic] of there being “open debate” so
long as you don’t rock the boat,
one man’s system another man’s corruption?
May I suggest you take note of my next follow up
communiqué to the top dogs at Cornell University addressing not only the
population numbers which empower the youth who are all our futures with each
tick of the almighty powerful clock but the other rather important issues of
the day such as “market forces”
and “land pricing” taught by Professors
of economics all over the world, you think Inga Reichenbach and Jim Mazza are
beginning to wish they had better screening when putting on shindigs to raise
monies from their alumni having either consumed far “tTOo much”
[sic] of their bs, “Preserving LONG life and
limb”
Just coming along to pig out at Cornell Universities
over the top spreads.
Later,
Gg
Ps
– When you read carefully Winn’s, “Henry Abarbanel met his
Waterloo in the person of citizen Gary Gevisser”
would you say even if it were true that I was “asked to leave the [town hall]
meeting at Del Mar Woods not because of your criticism of a political nature,
but because you mocked Mr. Abarbanel for his ‘gross obesity’”
that Winn was therefore remiss in excluding such a possibly “material” item which is why he is having so much
difficulty getting the publisher-editor of the Del Mar Times to run this
rather excellent article that begins to tell it exactly the way it is, Winn
forgetting, perhaps the result of inhaling Aspartame, that councilmember
Abarbanel as well as his cheerleaders became unglued when I picked up on
Abarbanel’s statement that he was “embarrassed”
when reading the title deed of a particular Del Mar property that excluded the
sale to “alcoholics” which to me
seemed nothing more than a smokescreen since such wording would have no bearing
in today’s “Dog eat
God
Aspartame”
[sic] world and so to flush out Abarbanel and prepare him for Winn who seemed
to know what he was talking about on this particular occasion I simply asked
Abarbanel, “What else did you find embarrassing? A
restriction selling to Jews? How about Blacks?
Such intellectual discourse occurring well before I
simply pointed out something that was not only obvious but surely a matter
Abarbanel must be most proud of, G-D forbid this councilmember were to suggest
that someone as smart as he had lost control of his poor eating habits.
Then again, if the publisher-editor of the Del Mar
Times were to run the story verbatim as
[Word count 888]
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Freedom of the Press
In this letter, you have expressed with clarity your commitment and your
frustration that even those who agree with you are in some way and to varying
degrees co-opted by their need to make a living. Some more. Some less. And even
those who are working in
I don’t really differ with your opinions about the complicity of those
who do anything other than call this situation by anything other than its right
name. I have not concluded, as you have, that Mssrs. Bush, Cheney, Romsfeld,
Wolfowitz, etc. are such angels. But it is wrong for you to say that I condone
the way the Democratic Party has operated during my lifetime. It was Lyndon
Johnson’s administration that escalated the war in
Still, each day I continue to learn more. I am not proud that Mr.
Clinton’s administration took the easy way around
consistently—about universal health care here, about
One thing that you and I have failed to mention about the interaction with
Abarbanel is that the only reason you were asked to leave the meeting at Del
Mar Woods was not because of your criticism of a political nature, but because
you mocked Mr. Abarbanel for his “gross obesity”.
Yours,
From:
Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:47
AM PT
To:
Cc: rest;
Subject: FW: Freedom of the Press
Mark – As you can see journalist-politician
