From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
Friday, October 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: JC
Cc: rest;
John Pollard
Subject: Corruption

 

I far prefer to communicate via email as it allows one to not only save time in avoiding telephone tag but it allows especially someone such as myself, not all that articulate in the English language to think before opening my mouth and talking nonsense.

 

Following our introduction last evening by our mutual friend Dr. Pollard I would very much like for you to put me in touch with Elliot Spitzer as I am sitting on irrefutable “smoking gun proof” of business-political corruption by an organization who retained me back in 2001 to assist first in overcoming some difficulties they were experiencing relating to their involvement with the Los Angeles Mayoral elections that were held in the summer and then a short while later after doing a rather decent job to assist them in reviewing business plans as well as spearheading the creation of a water fund.

 

Elliot Spitzer’s jurisdiction I believe in these matters would most likely be based on the fact that this Los Angeles based group made up of some rather powerful and rich business people in all likelihood did not have the appropriate securities licenses in place before engaging in their corrupt business practices.

 

Although I am not an attorney, my designation “failed university tutor” often times coming in handy when trying to determine whether someone’s formal education has interfered with their learning, I am, however, rather well versed on the subject of corruption and my most likely better than average command of numbers has me assisting from time to time the most successful and might I add rapacious litigators known as SCALs [Shareholder Class Action Litigators] such as Milberg Weiss-Lerach no doubt known to Mr. Spitzer.

 

My focus these day is to help bring out the “good” in people which means to hold those who usurp their limited authority in check, good people not sticking around very long with rotten apples, always willing, however, to give whoever I meet including those who seek my “risk assessment” services the benefit of the doubt but G-D only help them if it turns out that they are not who they say they are and I frankly cannot remember last when anyone took me for a “dog” [sic] other than last evening when Mary McDonald another of Dr. Pollard’s friends had Dr. Pollard in order to save my “4 skin” [sic] explain the castration that takes place in cows specifically when the female twin embryo takes its vengeance on behalf of all female human beings on its poor male sibling, vengeance as you may know is sweet to the heart of an Indian, my amazing French-Canadian Client-Partner-Wife Marie Dion is 1/32nd Huron Indian, a rather peaceful tribe, I understand?

 

My Don Quixote goal is to help build a new tribe based on the principle of truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, truth I believe rather well described in the words, “That which does not change”, agree?

 

I don’t think it would take Mr. Spitzer anytime at all to get his arms around the irrefutable “smoking gun proof”, my well acquainted with the need to “cut to the chase” when folks are so pressed for time in this “Dog eat God” [sic] world smart enough to know that proof is a function of evidence, the better the evidence the better the proof, this decision [see Application of law to facts] by Judge Jack B. Weinstein again someone probably well known to Mr. Spitzer giving Mr. Spitzer a sense of my credibility, this rather famous Federal judge crediting me in a landmark repetitive stress injury case with providing him with irrefutable “smoking gun proof” of corruption by plaintiff lawyers and their clients resulting in the first ever multi-million dollar jury award being overturned.

 

Furthermore, I have been cooperating with prosecutors involved with 2 very public Grand Juries seeking criminal indictments against Milberg Weiss-Lerach but given my intimate knowledge of the business practices of SCALs, these folks only bringing me in on their most difficult cases I doubt the assistant U.S. Attorney prosecuting the one case has the “backbone” to take on these folks whose mouths just water at the idea of an Assistant not even a United States Attorney taking them on, more than a handful of SCALs former United States Attorneys who look forward to government lawyers pounding the pavements knocking on their doors seeking as they put it, “a real paying job.”

 

The stakes here are rather large and the information I have although understandable to a 7th grader such as our JoNathan who is rather bright does have rather significant implications for investors around the world, less said the better.

 

I look forward to hearing from you as well as Mr. Spitzer.

 

Gary S. Gevisser