From: Gary S. Gevisser [gsg@sellnext.com]
Sent:
Friday, March 28, 2003 12:39 PM
To: George Hurst Esq., attorney for Dr. John Ben Stewart

Cc: Jodi Ruiz (jodir@abcklaw.com); Devin Standard (Devin@quasark.com); Jeff (jrk@class-action-law.com)
Subject: The meek WITH TEETH shall inherit the earth

 

 

Dear Mr. Hurst,

 

The main purpose of this e-mail is to assist you in helping your client come to the realization that besides for him not being above the law he should think very carefully about taking the law into his own hands, i.e. any illegal retribution towards anyone I happen to care about will be met with superior legal as well as moral force.

 

I will keep this e-mail relatively short for no other reason than the fact that I am currently visiting with Gene Reque my almost 90-year-old friend who lives less a block from the ocean here in Del Mar and [I have] to leave in 30 minutes to take Marie out for lunch at 12:45pm on the back of the Dukati. Once you come up for air you will undoubtedly ¡°get wind¡± of the Santa Anna winds that have the temperature in one of the spots I plan to take her to up in the 90s.

 

Gene as you may have read in one of my earlier communications was one of the design engineers responsible for the Studebaker and still happens to own a 1960 Studebaker two-door station wagon that runs brilliantly just like his mind which I put to the test early in our friendship while playing him a game of chess.

 

It should, however, not be more than a couple of days before Mr. Ashworth who I am having some difficulty reaching right now, files a complaint against Dr. Stewart et al for amongst many things tortuous interference in my business activities to mention little of my rights to privacy and you can bet your bottom dollar I [will] be exacting more than a penny in compensatory damages to mention little of the punitive damages ad-infinitum I will be seeking although I will accept a ¡°cashiers check¡± [sic] that I have determined to be fair and ties in well with the number of cruise missiles fired in the Baghdad theatre of operations this week.

 

Such amount will be mentioned in my next e-mail and like the e-mail your client sent his ex-wife, Marie Dion Stewart back on March 19th with only the words ¡°Re: TEETH¡± contained in the ¡°SubjectIVE¡± [sic] so will mine be ever so brief.

 

Your client will have until 5pm PST this coming Monday, March 31st, 2002 to deliver to the law offices of Finkelstein and Krinsk c/o Mr. Jeffrey Krinsk such amount with absolutely no strings attached. I will consider such payment much like what my SCAL colleagues refer to as a ¡°black box settlement¡± which essentially means that the money paid to me will remain private and I will not comment any further on these particular matters other than to let people know that a settlement has been reached. All other communications however, that have gone on prior to reaching such a settlement cannot be placed back into the ¡°black box¡± including the original complaint your client filed against me that was both false and misleading where he used his children [A La Saddam] as nothing more than a shield to attack me when I failed to pick up the gauntlet he threw at me 3 days prior to him filing his insidious complaint signed ¡°under penalty of perjury¡± on September 11th, 2002.[1]

 

Should your client choose not to settle matters with me then he will face a barrage of civil as well as criminal complaints although naturally I cannot force any DA anywhere in the State to take up what I think would be a very worthwhile cause even though it would send a very strong message that no matter one¡¯s formal education there is no substitute for lack of breeding, i.e. acting with honesty and discretion. Such complaint-s will also include anyone and everyone who played a hand in this rather dirty game. The evidence today of his wrongdoing is far more than anything I suggested in my e-mails prior to him deciding to go to war with me but ¡°just like¡± Saddam Hussein is now playing the victim so undoubtedly is your client.[2]

 

Your client had every opportunity to take the civilized approach in responding to anything I had said which got him so aggravated but instead he and his advisors felt that the way to deal with me was to usurp their limited authority and co-opt members of the San Diego Police Department as well as the FBI in an effort to intimidate me.

 

You know doubt recall you and your client¡¯s protestations during the proceedings in Judge Hendrix¡¯s courtroom back on October 24th of last year where the e-mail your client sent me was described as a ¡°mistake¡± by Dr. Stewart¡¯s 13-year-old daughter. The children may not be so-called ¡°perfect¡± but nor do I believe they will lie in any court room setting which is something I have been trying to avoid at all cost. And of course we all understand why you and your client continued to pursue your baseless allegations against me in a criminal court setting for the simple reason that I wouldn¡¯t be able to call the children as witnesses, despite Judge Hendrix at the beginning of the proceedings almost pleading with you to reconsider getting these matters resolved in Family Court.

 

Nor is their mother so-called ¡°perfect¡± to mention little of me for the time being. Marie Dion Stewart, however, proved her mettle in that courtroom and then some. Her declaration although not quite as precise as she was in court or for that matter when she communicates with the children who fully understand her and my value system as being very much aligned, can in fact count, none more so than adding up to 10. And as you know had she decided to stick out her marriage with Dr. Stewart for just a few more months as opposed to his first wife who I understand bailed out well ahead of achieving ¡°tenure¡±, Dr. Stewart would have had in all likelihood to support my ¡°travel companion¡± the rest of her life. Instead, putting the children¡¯s best interests ahead of her own she chose to get the heck out of Dr. Stewart¡¯s second marriage, taking her licks, accepting the responsibility of having made a poor decision.

 

She as well as I would much prefer to dwell on other matters and of course we are fortunate to have many other interests in common, this matter though is one that just doesn¡¯t seem to want to go away much like the TOES out there hell bent on coming up with a unified theory of the inner workings of the universe, not, however, wanting to embrace God. I may not have all the answers right now that folks everywhere will agree with but at least I am trying to come up with solutions including finding ways for kids to save their own futures.

 

Marie¡¯s idea of recycling ¡°stained¡± t-shirts, helping to save the planet using what we already have, that is out there, is much like how I have gone about in my quest to prove out that Einstein¡¯s theory e=mc©÷ does in fact incorporate a unified theory that should inspire the masses of kids out there to reach well beyond the stars and embrace God, understanding more about the meaning of life and most of all empowering them to parent the parents who need the most help.

 

You might derive great satisfaction in mocking my EmanANDdog ¢² GODdnaNAME to mention little of my ¡°number theory¡± but what exactly have you done with your life to bring help and meaning to others to uplift them from the depression that mostly places the masses at their wits-end while ritzy folk seek shelter with psychologists and psychiatrists and of course if need be we will be sending out interrogatories in preparation for deposing colleagues of your client including the medical director of Sharp Memorial Hospital whose declaration of my well-being without ever having met me will remain out there in perpetuity to mention little of the impact what will possibly befall their Errors and Omissions insurance premiums by the time my lawsuit against your client et al makes it ways through the various court houses around the world.

 

Make no mistake if need be I will make this case a ¡°case celebre¡± [sic] for the simple reason it covers a huge territory of injustice that speaks to many out there including the momworker63s, orphans, widows, and pensioners. Ever wondered why the word ¡°widowers¡± are generally excluded from that all-important expression, perhaps much like WITH TEETH somehow got left out from Mathew 5.5?

 

I tend to forget very little these days having worked out a number of techniques that has me able to prioritize the things of importance as I reach out to the masses with a number of memorable expressions. And you know of a few such as

 

DNA

Next tTOo

Breeding is everything

 

&

 

Sum

Things

Are

Built tTOo

Last.

Evolution?

 

Which should hopefully inspire kids around the world to compete head-4-head in our universal contest of Kids-4-Kids saving their future, encouraging kids, teachers, school principals, boards of education for the bored elitists to show their meat + TEETH.

 

Man, not ¡°dog¡± [sic] is his own worst enemy.

 

I understand from a neighbor that one of my recent e-mails contained a photograph of Jonathan. I have painstakingly gone through my website directory to delete all photos that depict him and I assume you have no problem with his artwork that not only attracts interest from around the world but helps make him financially independent and most of all responsible. Even Danielle has made a contribution or tTOo so please let me know what you think.

 

Given the fact that I have thousands of pictures taken over the years now scanned into my computer system there is always the possibility that I may have missed one or tTOo. So, please let me know if there are any photos which you would like me to delete.

 

It is also my understanding from my attorney Mr. Ashworth that he was not yet comfortable in signing the various draft stipulations you presented to him. The rest of us in that courtroom, however, recall very clearly Judge Hendrix¡¯s decision that called for the lifting of the improper restraining order on me being with the kids and a restraining order placed on your client, Dr. Stewart, so much so that when the kids were in the custody of their mother and I happened to be around, God help your client if he were to show up uninvited which he did on several occasions without me responding in kind as he did by calling the San Diego Police Department as well as the FBI.

 

As you know Mr. Ashworth and I attended a hearing a few weeks ago the result of your client back on September 12th 2002 deciding to usurp his authority once again and assert that I had violated the TRO [Temporary Restraining Order] he had, in my opinion, illegally obtained the day before. Again, I have no problem in arguing all my points in any court of law here in the United States or simply taking it all the way to the court of public opinion.

 

In a matter of days I will be contacting Professor Bernie Black of Stanford University who like other professors of Ivy League schools may prefer I simply disappeared off the face of the earth but I will be leaving him with little or no choice but to meet with me where I will present evidence of malfeasance at the highest levels of the Democratic Party or answer a little later to a much bigger audience as to why he like others on my e-mail list prefer to duck acting like ducks, water over a duck¡¯s backside is really hard to tell unless of course you decide to get up real close.

 

I also agreed as part of Judge Hendrix¡¯s very fair ruling not to say disparaging remarks to the children about their father and of course the same we assumed would be required of Dr. Stewart, i.e. for him to say nothing disparaging against me to the children about me although I understand he feels very comfortable in using the word, ¡°fart.¡± I spell this all out for you for the simple reason that we all assumed your client also has a hearing problem as you went about so painstakingly to explain what can be thought of nothing short of a landmark ruling.

 

Other than what was described above, I can think of nothing more that was covered in the courtroom of any consequence back on October 24th 2002, wouldn¡¯t you agree? I also assume that there is a complete record taken by the court room stenographer that describes exactly what occurred including the Judge¡¯s exacerbation at the start of the proceeding that had him questioning why these matters were being held in his courtroom as opposed to family court.

 

Again, it is very important to me that I be in compliance with Judge Hendrix¡¯s court order so please take the time out of your very busy schedule to let me know about such photos which could be stressing out certain individuals.

 

Sincerely,

 

Gary S. Gevisser

 

 

 

PS – I wonder whether Dr. John Ben Stewart has been subjected to the Chinese curse; may you live in interesting times, i.e. instability, floods, famine, fires, wars, opposites of a calm life.

 

 

I have not checked this e-mail, ¡°butt¡± [sic] should there be changes I would like to make later I will let you know.

 

 

 



[1] Gene just mentioned that back in the 1930s he purchased a ¡°SCAL¡± [sic] motorcycle for $25 although the seller wanted $30. He just showed me a photo of a very similar motorcycle and corrected me that it was in fact an Indian ¡°Scout¡± motorcycle but I just can¡¯t get Shareholder Class Action Litigation [SCAL] work completely off my mind even though I am today fully retired unless of course someone wishes to pay my hourly rate of $126,000 to hear me talk ¡°gobbledygook.¡±

 

[2] Egocentric individuals show symptoms of the manic side of the bi-polar, at various degrees, a condition common amongst professional people, like attorneys, doctors and whathaveyou, who have invariably, in my non-professional opinion, let their formal education interfere with their learning. Most of them, however, as one would expect exhibit a healthy dose of depression.