< From: Gary S

From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:05 PM PT
To: Adam Tucker
Cc: rest;  ngould@hkstar.com; 60m@cbsnews.com; editor@shanghaidaily.com; Edward Jay Epstein - Author of The Diamond Invention; Larry King Live; Mary.Campbell@wsj.com; Oprah; Playboy; Rabbi Abner Weiss; Professor Joe Grundfest - Sanford University - former Chairman of the SEC; Rush Limbaugh; Sternshow@howardstern.com
Subject: RE:...EXAMINE NOT THE "REALITY" BUT THE "PRACTICALITY"...---... LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

Your sex toy distraction almost worked.

 

Moreover, it even got a big smile out of Marie.

 

While joining Neil Gould and others spreading our revealing dialogue over the Internet share with me in simple English what you understand about my rather important point that has the smart Chinese not all that upset about the DAAC controlled United States Federal Reserve deciding to hold off in bursting the mostly U.S. real estate bubble and not increase interest rates knowing also such a move in taking Wall Street by surprise would have zero effect on the U.S. negative savings rate given how increasingly even Americans are waking up to the fact that their lack of productivity cannot offset the out-of-control printing of fictitious DeBeers-Dollars beginning in earnest back in July 1944 following the outrageous Bretton Woods Conference that so few of us in the west know all that much about much like American 5 Star General Stilwell, a National Hero in China.

 

Moreover, I think you would agree that the anything but slave-wage earning Chinese even if interest rates here in the U.S. were to drop to zero would continue to invest significant portions of their trade surplus in worthless United States Treasury Bills helping prop up the worthless DeBeers-Dollars responsible for our over-the-top fictitious lifestyles until such time as these winners of World War III, victorious without having fired a shot, are satisfied with the technology transfer before dumping the remainder of their worthless DeBeers-Dollars and zeroing in on their domestic market 5 times + the size of the U.S. even before the massive devaluation of the DeBeers-Dollar that has bothered the oil producing nations to know end [sic] to mention little of a lot of this Knowledge-Information-Light has already begun to occur in earnest well illustrated in the rise in the price of gold but it is just taking time to reach folks like Guy Friedmans grandmother-in-law who lives in a remote area of China accessible only to sherpers guided by Israeli Special Forces trained Bedouin.

 

[Word count 348]

 


From: Adam Tucker
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:10 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

Note that not once in this dialogue have I criticized or refuted your comments about my family or even more specifically an uncle that I don’t even care for; I am only questioning the relevance of the topic of sex and in particular Julia’s sexual needs as it pertains to the DAAC… please don’t justify the 6 degrees of separation between the manufacturing of sex toys or the manipulation of sex in the corrupt media, etc.

 

For the record I am not disagreeing with what you have said regarding the world or my family, so please don’t justify your argument based upon it.


From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 6:11 PM
To: 'Adam Tucker'
Cc: ngould@hkstar.com
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

It all comes down to “money” as in “pricing.”

 

I think you know perfectly well that I have the intelligence to understand each and every one of your bs points bearing in mind that not only do you listen to Howard Stern who appeals with his crude language and treating all women including his black sidekick when need be as a “sex object” to the lowest common denominator of Americans despite Howard being very possibly the most intelligent bought and paid for media personality in the world BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY you KNOW perfectly well that I am fully ON TOP OF you CHOOSING to miss the REASON why I bring not only your wife Julia but each and every other member of your very corrupt family in to “the equation.”

 

I believe I spelled this all out rather well in my earlier response to Dr. Tea but let me try one more time.

 

Even if Julia is so “unbalanced”, incapable of being “empowered” by seeing you as her “sex object” she should at least be willing to get down on all 4s and thank me very sincerely for pointing out the fact that you, not your uncle, not your mother, not your father, not Julia’s grandfather or anyone else on the planet IS RESPONSIBLE for “blackening her hands” when you CHOSE to inform her of your one uncle’s “money laundering” activities bearing in mind this is all about “muni” [sic].

 

The soap that was used to wash the tablecloth that sits upon the dining room table where you have all at least once congregated came with a “price”.

 

Need I say more other than for you to let Julia and/or anyone else you know join in the “dialogue” bearing in mind that the Chinese sleep only when having sex .

 

And of course I have to spell it out more.

 

Everything including repetition gets boring after while.

 

Pointing out each and every “indiscretion” gets tiring after a while.

 

Suggesting that I find something else besides for harping on about your uncle who derived “competitive advantage” by his “gift” of worthless DeBeers-Dollars makes ABSOLUTELY no sense.

 

Have both yourself and Julia examine not the “morality” but the “practicality” of how you have both wittingly and unwittingly benefited by the “competitive advantage” provided courtesy of the DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel, the money launderers of money launderers.

 

I am not only a very busy person but I am in fact a rather efficient business person who understands probably better than most that in this topsy-turvy-curvy world in order to avoid “shocking people to death” one has to “draw things out”.

 

You have no doubt heard that the Chinese use “slave wage earners” or words to the same effect in order to maintain their extraordinary high level of productivity.

 

You have no doubt also envisioned in your head someone looking like a slave master beating these slave wage earners “to death”.

 

You are to the best of my knowledge only aware of one man, Jesus Christ, who many in this “dog eat god aspartame” [sic] believe was resurrected.

 

Need I say more about how many slave wage earners beaten to death show up repeatedly for work, day in day out, decade after decade before deciding after using some of their savings to read about the negative savings rate in the United States, the welfare state capital of the world before then pondering the insidious business of “money creation” perfected by the DAAC, the money launderers of money launderers who make it their business to co-opt-corrupt not just people like Adam Tucker’s uncle but Adam who wittingly or unwittingly, i.e. shell-shocked or not yet shell-shocked “sees fit” to corrupt-co-opt each and every person he comes into contact with so much so that these anything but enslaved Chinese people envision a moment in time, like right now, this instant when someone like Adam and his wife, Julie, would wake up to the distinct possibility that another DAAC operative could have arrived a minute ago at the doorstep of their competitor and made the same sort of deal that was made with Adam’s uncle who understood perfectly well how easy it would be to get an “insurance policy” by co-opting-corrupting each and every immediate and extended member of his Mafioso family resulting in Adam and Julia who can now thanks to yours truly helping them read the minds of the very smart Chinese deciding that the “game is up” and either take a slow boat to china or do like everyone else in a welfare state getting more than their fair share of the graft and point fingers in the direction of the “bearer of bad news”.

 

The good news is that you haven’t yet decided to take a slow boat to China, at least not until I either publish my forthcoming book or use this email and the such to beat Marie to die the richest person in the grave.

 

Shalom.

 

[Word count 824]

 


From: Adam Tucker
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:34 PM
To: 'Gary S. Gevisser'
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

To clarify, I have issue with your repeated irrelevant sexual references regarding myself and my wife. These comments are uneducated and at times offensive and unnecessary. Your instruction to “take whatever monies that have been left to Julia, have her take out just what she needs to get by over the course of the next couple of weeks couple weeks including finding a replacement sex object” was unnecessary and in my mind did nothing for anyone but add shock value and a transition between points. I know you well enough to know that you use similar methods to evoke a response from various people and I am offended that you would feel the need to go there. Unless I am incorrect, your email was intended to gain more involvement post informing you that I was still busy or as you would say “distracted”. That said, “family stuff” as mentioned in my email has/had nothing to do with inheritance (as there is no money for us). Regardless I don’t see how your, completely incorrect assumption regarding what I meant by “family stuff” and your subsequent “instructions” have anything to do with what you/we are trying to accomplish.

 

I have ignored your previous comments regarding Julia as I could usually stretch and derive a point for them, but this was nothing more than to evoke shock and as a means of transitioning from one point to the next. Your emails are as much for the “audience” as they are for the intended recipient, and so I am aware, but I won’t participate in this form of communication if you intend to you use me for salacious attention. In my mind it not only aggravates me, but that aggravation takes away from a critical response.

 

 


From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:20 PM
To: 'Adam Tucker'
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

I am really tired right now and if I haven’t already responded via other emails what is Julia’s “relevance” to what I told you then first thing tomorrow I will address this so very important point “If you want to motivate me then remind me how of things could be or should be” makes absolutely perfect sense assuming you are IGNORING the extraordinary damage done to the human psyche by the DAAC who haven’t simply hooked couples on diamond engagement rings but in getting couples particularly the women so downtrodden in society thanks to all the corrupt clergy to be focused primarily on “muni” [sic].

 

Not only have you not commented on your lack of knowledge of American 5 Star General Stilwell but given how much you like the movies and my going on and on and on about SPIelberg’s MUNIch you have yet to stop everything you are doing including “making a living” to first understand yourself all that is going on in this all important movie but to then EDUCATE not only Julia but each member of your very corrupt family who “turned a blind eye” to your one uncle “blackening” all your hands, just one other “emotional hangup” preventing you from the all important task of losing your “family identity”.

 

Later

 


From: Adam Tucker
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:39 PM
To: 'Gary S. Gevisser'
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

I normally ignore your references to Julia, but I really don’t understand her relevance in what you had to tell me? I wouldn’t question it if you had ever given a solid justification for it. When a person makes references like that it is normally because it is meant to evoke an emotional response, but if I did respond emotionally you would criticized me negatively for it. I have found that I have more success in getting what I want when I create an environment that fosters it. If you write someone the way you wrote me, you are reducing your likelihood of getting a critically composed response and increasing the likelihood of an emotional response.

 

If you want to motivate me then remind me how of things could be or should be; I don’t appreciate feeling the need to waste my time and yours to explain this.   

 


From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 4:53 PM
To: 'Adam Tucker'
Cc: editor@shanghaidaily.com; Goldman Sachs; Jeffrey Essakow (E-mail); JohnStossel@abcnews.com; King Golden Jr. Esq.; Oprah; Conrad Wolff; Roy Essakow; Mossad; President@whitehouse.gov; President Rosenberg of the Screen Actors Guild
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

It doesn’t seem like much has changed in your life since I left for China a month ago today?

 

Your “feedback” may in fact be all that I need in order to meet the deadline I set for myself to have a first draft complete of my forthcoming book with the subtitle, “A message for the President” by August 1st for Marie to “edit” bearing in mind I haven’t even begun and most likely wont begin until at the earliest next week given all the other stuff I have to contend with including assisting the State of Israel recapture the kidnapped Israeli soldiers a “burden” each one of us who has failed to provide our “best efforts” in exposing the dark rot of the DAAC DeBeers-U.S Dollars must now carry the rest of our natural lives.

 

May I may make a totally “off the wall” suggestion knowing perfectly well there is the remote possibility you will follow through; to take whatever monies that have been left to Julia, have her take out just what she needs to get by over the course of the next couple of weeks couple weeks including finding a replacement sex object and for you to take the balance and use it to buy a one way economy airline ticket to China and to meet with only my friend Storm in Beijing bearing in mind that Storm is the “Loyalty Manager” at the hotel we stayed at and to have Storm arrange for you to convert whatever balance of monies remain into gold bullion but not before you meet with our Beijing guide whose English name is Maggie and to have Maggie now in her mid thirties but who practiced radiology for 7 years after 5 years at university before deciding that she “didn’t like seeing dead bodies” to arrange a daily excursion using the exact same taxi driver that was assigned to us to the Sumatai section of The Great Wall and not forget to maintain a decent pace up to the 13th watchtower so that by the time you are “fit and trim” and having benefited from Storm’s “no nonsense” you will finally rid yourself of your bs family and return safe and sound to the U.S.  via a slow boat.

 

My China”, a “fond” South African expression, please consider one possible alternative.

 

Spend the same amount of money in Hong Kong, the “money capital of the world” by visiting with my good friend Neil “Alien” Gould and his utter “bullsh*t” [sic] Russian mafia partner who might by this time be exclusively in search of an underwater cave in which to hang out until such time as all the kidnapped Israeli soldiers have been returned “in one piece” and the Messiah has arrived and for you to come away feeling that you have nothing to worry about, that neither Neil nor his Alien friends or for that matter the entire Russian, Greek, Italian, South African and not to forget the DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel , the mafia of mafia have all combined their forces resulting in the Chinese economy collapsing and you can toss your worthless gold into the filthy Hong Kong waters creating a sufficient wave to have back in no time with your over-the-top corrupt family.

 

I assume you have fully digested the E-mail I sent earlier to my pal Professor Joe Grundfest over at Stanford University which is not to suggest that you are now just pulling my leg, out on a golf course leading to the Stone Forest in Kunming with a whole bunch of relatively young kids from all over the world laughing themselves silly at the “sight” of this rather important educator UNDERSTANDING PERFECTLY WELL the upcoming EXTRAORDINARY IMPACT of my having met one of his former students at the bottom of the zipline traveled by both Marie and me as well as Michael Straus Esq. and his “significant other” which has you now very possibly thinking of entering into a Joint Venture with Neil Gould’s at one time so full-of-himself Russian mafia partner who brings nothing to the table other than intimidation which as you can possibly well imagine is not the sort of thing that works all that well in the “real world”, not all that well depicted in Steven SPIelberg’s movie, MUNIch.

 

Don’t you find it strange that my Royal Mater when talking to a stranger such as Tefo lets him know that I have a “problem” and that I am also “very convincing” and of course Zena Rosland Ash Gevisser Zulman is quite certain in her mind that I am “nuts” but what does it tell you not only about my mother but pretty much everyone who has something to hide, inevitably resorting to the “pot calling the kettle black”?

 

Increasingly, no one, especially those such as my RM who “only debate people who agree with her” knows who they can trust which is why we have so many deafeningly silences which talk volumes.

 

The Chinese, while the most extraordinarily productive, non-aggressive, and so very happy people are VERY MUCH AWARE of the DAACDiamond Currency” games that have been going on far too long in the rest of world.

 

And make no mistake they are currently greatly helped by me bringing to THEIR attention WHY IT IS that one of their national heroes, a 5 Star American General who “saved the day” in a myriad of ways during World War II is nothing short of TOTALLY UNKNOWN in the U.S.

 

Until such time as you visit the Stilwell Museum in ChongQing that houses some 30+ million chinese you really should “shut the f*ck up” [sic] other than again to spend time either with Storm and then again just one day with Neil Gould with or without his Russian mafia partner taping your conversations and upon your return to call up and ask Scott Tinley a rather well-known Iron Man competitor about the hilarious conversation we had this past Saterday when he confused me with Jeffrey Essakow; upon hearing my voice Scott began, “You are not safe. We are here in Luecadia and we are exposing you!

 

Bear in mind I have never met nor had I previously spoken with Scott who was at one time a partner of Jeffrey Essakow to mention little of Jeffrey whose is financed by his brother Roy Essakow of Marc “trading with the enemy” Rich fame having also been a guest on Neil Gould’s double decker boat in need of a paint job. 

 

BTW when you have the chance you should come down to our cliff house in Del Mar and at least see the great window cleaning job JoNathan and I did earlier today.

 

Right now there is the most refreshing breeze blowing off the terrific Pacific “Oshon” [sic] bearing constantly in mind that it is not only the Chinese and their allies watching us extraordinarily closely as we the western alliance evacuates their citizens out of the Middle East following the decision by the Israelis not to give their “traditional” allies the customary “heads up” to mention little of this Iranian woman who lives in Dubai who I “ran into” just as we passed through customs in Hangzhou on our way to Hong Kong who informed me that she was in the “baby products” business and when I eventually looked at her business card when Marie and I were seated in the waiting lounge there was no name just telephone numbers and a yahoo email account along with the markings of a diamond stone.

 

[Word count 1257]

 


From: Adam Tucker
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 3:03 PM
To: 'Gary S. Gevisser'
Subject: RE: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times

 

Julia’s grandfather passed away recently so all of our weekends have been devoted to family stuff; which is why did not call you back yesterday.

 

I am online, but I am swamped and may not be able to respond immediately.

 

 

 


From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:02 AM
To: Adam Tucker
Subject: LEt me know when u r next online. I am about to begin a dialogue with another reporter from the NY Times