From: Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To:
Cc: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE: FW: Warren v. Stewart
Why did you not respond sooner?
Second, it was stated very clearly that not only was and
is time of the essence you were instructed back on November 4th to, "Please
forward this communiqué to Kimball et al.”
Today is the 12th and the first we hear that
you did in fact follow through on my explicit request.
Provide me with confirmation that you did exactly as I
requested.
I am disgusted by your insinuation of my wrongdoing,
“Your
refusal to meet with me to discuss your case violates the cooperation clause of
the Attorney-Client Fee Contract”
I did not refuse to meet with you, to repeat my November
5th email,
If you feel that I need to reassure you of my eloquence in
court then I will oblige. I don’t think we need to discuss this case any
further.
Any questions you can email.
And then this past Monday I followed up with;
I have yet to hear from you the purpose of this meeting.
Time is of the essence.
Question, have you forwarded the email stating my Settlement
Demands to the
You have to realize Gary and I are in business together. My
business is his business. His business is my business. We want it to be
successful. At the same time we want to improve humanity. We are in a position
to teach other people how to handle business like this one that has gone out of
control because of greed. It is an important issue to a lot of people in the
same situation as ours. We want to make the most of this win or lose.
Of course winning would be in our interest as well as yours,
this whole thing being so public.
Our initial meeting didn’t raise any doubts in your
mind as to the strength of the case, agreeing I seem to recall that the actions
of the Warrens et al was a waste of time, money and abuse of the system, agree?
Facts are facts, you cannot escape the emails. It is
black on grey, agree?
Our 12 year old Jonathan who 2 weeks ago was on The
Internet having participated in his first surfing competition just commenting,
“Just to be clear put in parentheses after “it” the words
“The screen”.
Marie
Ps - How
telling this sudden generosity of time from the Warrens and Ms. Goetz’s
fall vacation, so anxious a few months back to get me out, sparing no words or
effort like hiring lawyers, to mention little of asking me for a copy of the
lease document which spelled out in “black and white” their “malicious
fraud”, now delaying these matters maybe in the hopes of me
disappearing off the face of the earth?
So forgetful it seems you are of the damages caused to
our reputation and business as a result of their reckless behavior?
Ps I – To
repeat the closing paragraph of my November 4th email.
I
have yet to hear from u what claims can be made against such scoundrels along
with the damages I would be entitled to besides for what Mr. Gevisser who
recognizes rather well those who have consistently built into their cost
of sales the cost of getting caught being taking on
educational light journeys, dragged through
their own dirt, their formal education clearly having interfered with their
learning, The Internet from what I can gather quite the perfect medium for me
to express my grievances as opposed to keeping things so awfully quiet, the
deafening silences speaking volumes at this time including all the “fix” requests I have made
from the very beginning including the electrical sockets which pose a physical
threat to our well being, to mention how very beneath me it would be to ever
play victim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Passante
[mailto:ajp@martin-passante.com]
Sent:
To: marie
Subject: Re: FW:
Marie,
Your comment is disappointing
and unnecessary,
especially since your refusal to
meet with me to
discuss your case violates the
cooperation clause of
the Attorney-Client Fee Contract
that we signed.
There are many fine lawyers in
free to hire any of them to
represent you or you can
represent yourself if you so
choose. I will cooperate
in transferring your file.
I conveyed your demand and was waiting for a
response from the other
side. I spoke to them this
morning and they rejected your
demand. They have
offered to allow you to stay
until
provided you agree to move out
by that date and pay
rent for the time up until that
date. Let me know
your response.
The trial date has been changed
again due to the
unavailability of Lori
Goetz. The proposed new date
is
have a conflict.
--- marie
<mdg42203@sbcglobal.net - Fri 11/12/2004
Your lack of response makes
me question what to expect next.
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From:
Marie Dion [Gevisser]
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE:
I have yet to hear from you
the purpose of this meeting.
Time is of the essence.
Question, have you forwarded
the email stating my Settlement Demands to the
You have to realize Gary and
I are in business together. My business is his business. His business is my
business. We want it to be successful. At the same time we want to improve
humanity. We are in a position to teach other people how to handle business
like this one that has gone out of control because of greed. It is an important
issue to a lot of people in the same situation as ours. We want to make the
most of this win or lose.
Of course winning would be
in our interest as well as yours, this whole thing being so public.
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From:
Anthony Passante
Sent:
To:
Marie Dion Stewart
Subject:
Marie,
The trial date was moved to
11 at 10
or 11. Please let me know.