From:
Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005
11:57 AM PT
To:
Cc: rest;
Subject: RE: chocolATE...---...
Mr. Senior Risk Management specialist,
As best I know you are not a scientist.
You did, however, entrust me with amongst a number
of items of import to the “general public”
this as well as this Confidential Internal Memo
belonging to your employer who in your words is the “fony crap megalopoly”
of AIG-Marsh-McLennan-ACE Ltd.
Rather than wear another hat why
not explain your understanding of the negative effects of Aspartame,
specifically as it relates to short term memory loss, Aspartame not only a drug found in a number of
consumer products including diet colas, candy and toothpaste but one considered
“so dangerous” to the
“Public Health”
that your employer in the business of “making
a profit”
decided not to insure “SD Searle” [sic] the
Then again there are the “under the
table” deals that someone such as yourself while a senior risk
management specialist would not necessarily be all that privy to, can’t
recall in all the 9
odd years I have known you but once recently traveling outside the borders of
the United States while “conducting business”
on behalf of your “fony crap megalopoly”
that again in your own words you have had quite “sum” [sic]
difficulty “separating”
from?
Moreover, there appear to have been few Aspartame
related lawsuits being “settled” in any courtroom NOR has the United States Congress,
to the best of my knowledge, thought very seriously about “exercising good judgment” much
like the Federal Reserve by having an “open debate” on such an
important subject?
And of course if you were to be hauled before
Congress could I count on you to raise the issue of the DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel [DAAC] having
had for a 100 or so years an exclusive right to engineer-
But unlike Frye your concern was that it would be
the Feds who would be booking you on a one way ticket to jail unless of course
again you had “sumthing” [sic] to “plea bargain”
with to mention little of what the DAAC have been
doing with all their laundered monies these past 100 years other than co-opt
those further down the pyramid, no one really complaining much while grabbing a
piece of the “graft”?
Please forgive me for my hurried text as I have a
number of things to deal with this morning before a court date at 1 PM PT including
contacting more folks from the New York Times to at a
minimum seriously consider “beefing up”
their “network security”
systems preventing folks from using their telephone system to make threatening
phone calls.
So fearful and lazy are
some that the next generation is getting up to Light-g-D-Speed quicker than the
“old farts”
amongst us would have dreamed possible in their worst nightmare.
Ps
– In due course you can read this email again and again by also going to
the AIG Yahoo message board.
[Word count 536]
-----Original Message-----
From: Bellows,
Sent:
To: 'Gary S. Gevisser'
Subject: RE: chocolATE
I'm not sure what the hell
your talking about below - but if you're asking if Homo s-x uality is
environmental or genetically based - the bulk to the research points to the
later -
I tend to agree - those so
inclined honestly have no choice - they are born with that inclination -
As to whether or not or DNA
has been polluted to cause such - the research also points to the negative as
many species show this tendency as well -
The most notable consideration
for life in the 20th century is likely the improved communication -
increased population and liberalization of society - along with the high
visibility of STD's which have shinned a light more closely into this world -
which has always existed but kept its head down to follow social morays -
hope that helps
Tech.
Serv. Mgr.
AIG
Consultant's Inc
908 679
3304
