From: Mvw
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:44 PM
To: Gary Gevisser
Subject: News from Davos

 

Hi Gary

 

What follows is the content of an email I received from a friend who is connected to a journalist for Newsday.  It is basically her notes from attending the most recent world economic forum in Davos.  She seem to have had pretty good access to the powerful with and without teeth who is trying to screw up the earth.  The tone of it may be up your ally.

 

It is NOT an email about how the South Africans know how to party!

 

Marius

 

 

>Hi Guys.

>

>OK, hard to believe, but true. Yours truely has been hobnobbing with the

>ruling class.

>

>I spent a week in Davos, Switzerland at the World Economic Forum. I was

>awarded a special pass which allowed me full access to not only the

>entire official meeting, but also private dinners with the likes the

>head of the Saudi Secret Police, presidents of various insundry

>countries, your Fortune 500 CEOS and the leaders of the most important

>NGOs in the world. This was not typical press access. It was full-on,

>unfettered, class A hobnobbing.

>

>Davos, I discovered, is a breathtakingly beautiful spot, unlike anything

>I'd ever experienced. Nestled high in the Swiss Alps, it's a three hours

>train ride from Zurich that finds you climbing steadily through

>snow-laden mountains that bring to mind Heidi and Audrey Hepburn (as in

>the opening scenes of "Charade"). The EXTREMELY powerful arrive by

>helicopter. The moderately powerful take the first class train. The NGOs

>and we mere mortals reach heaven via coach train or a conference bus.

>Once in Europe's bit of heaven conferees are scattered in hotels that

>range from B&B to ultra luxury 5-stars, all of which are located along

>one of only three streets that bisect the idyllic village of some 13,000

>permanent residents.

>

>Local Davos folks are fanatic about skiing, and the slopes are literally

>a 5-15 minute bus ride away, depending on which astounding downhill you

>care to try. I don't know how, so rather than come home in a full body

>cast I merely watched.

>

>This sweet little chalet village was during the WEF packed with about

>3000 delegates and press, some 1000 Swiss police, another 400 Swiss

>soldiers, numerous tanks and armored personnel carriers, gigantic rolls

>of coiled barbed wire that gracefully cascaded down snow-covered

>hillsides, missile launchers and assorted other tools of the national

>security trade. The security precautions did not, of course, stop there.

>Every single person who planned to enter the conference site had special

>electronic badges which, upon being swiped across a reading pad,

>produced a computer screen filled color portrait of the attendee, along

>with his/her vital statistics. These were swiped and scrutinized by

>soldiers and police every few minutes -- any time one passed through a

>door, basically. The whole system was connected to handheld wireless

>communication devices made by HP, which were issued to all VIPs. I got

>one. Very cool, except when they crashed. Which, of course, they did

>frequently. These devices supplied every imagineable piece of

>information one could want about the conference, your fellow delegates,

>Davos, the world news, etc. And they were emailing devices --- all

>emails being monitored, of course, by Swiss cops.

>

>Antiglobalization folks didn't stand a chance. Nor did Al Qaeda. After

>all, if someone managed to take out Davos during WEF week the world

>would basically lose a fair chunk of its ruling and governing class

>POOF, just like that. So security was the name of the game. Metal

>detectors, X-ray machines, shivering soldiers standing in blizzards,

>etc.

>

>Overall, here is what I learned about the state of our world:

>

>- I was in a dinner with heads of Saudi and German FBI, plus the

>foreign minister of Afghanistan. They all said that at its peak Al Qaeda

>had 70,000 members. Only 10% of them were trained in terrorism -- the

>rest were military recruits. Of that 7000, they say all but about 200

>are dead or in jail.

>

>- But Al Qaeda, they say, is like a brand which has been heavily

>franchised. And nobody knows how many unofficial franchises have been

>spawned since 9/11.

>

>- The global economy is in very very very very bad shape. Last year

>when WEF met here in New York all I heard was, "Yeah, it's bad, but

>recovery is right around the corner". This year "recovery" was a word

>never uttered. Fear was palpable -- fear of enormous fiscal hysteria.

>The watchwords were "deflation", "long term stagnation" and "collapse of

>the dollar". All of this is without war.

>

>- If the U.S. unilaterally goes to war, and it is anything short of a

>quick surgical strike (lasting less than 30 days), the economists were

>all predicting extreme economic gloom: falling dollar value, rising spot

>market oil prices, the Fed pushing interest rates down towards zero with

>resulting increase in national debt, severe trouble in all countries

>whose currency is guaranteed agains the dollar (which is just about

>everybody except the EU), a near cessation of all development and

>humanitarian programs for poor countries. Very few economists or

>ministers of finance predicted the world getting out of that economic

>funk for minimally five-10 years, once the downward spiral ensues.

>

>- Not surprisingly, the business community was in no mood to hear about

>a war in Iraq. Except for diehard American Republicans, a few Brit

>Tories and some Middle East folks the WEF was in a foul, angry

>anti-American mood. Last year the WEF was a lovefest for America. This

>year the mood was so ugly that it reminded me of what it felt like to be

>an American overseas in the Reagan years. The rich -- whether they are

>French or Chinese or just about anybody -- are livid about the Iraq

>crisis primarily because they believe it will sink their financial

>fortunes.

>

>- Plenty are also infuriated because they disagree on policy grounds. I

>learned a great deal. It goes FAR beyond the sorts of questions one

>hears raised by demonstrators and in UN debates. For example:

>

>- If Al Qaeda is down to merely 200 terrorists cadres and a

>handful of wannabe franchises, what's all the fuss?

>

>- The Middle East situation has never been worse. All hope for a

>settlement between Israel and Palestine seems to have evaporated. The

>energy should be focused on placing painful financial pressure on all

>sides in that fight, forcing them to the negotiating table. Otherwise,

>the ME may well explode. The war in Iraq is at best a distraction from

>that core issue, at worst may aggravate it. Jordan's Queen Rania spoke

>of the "desperate search for hope".

>

>- Serious Islamic leaders (e.g. the King of Jordan, the Prime

>Minster of Malaysia, the Grand Mufti of Bosnia) believe that the Islamic

>world must recapture the glory days of 12-13th C Islam. That means

>finding tolerance and building great education institutions and places

>of learning. The King was passionate on the subject. It also means

>freedom of movement and speech within and among the Islamic nations.

>And, most importantly to the WEF, it means flourishing free trade and

>support for entrepeneurs with minimal state regulation. (However, there

>were also several Middle East respresentatives who argued precisely the

>opposite. They believe bringing down Saddam Hussein and then pushing the

>Israel/Palestine issue could actually result in a Golden Age for Arab

>Islam.)

>

>- US unilateralism is seen as arrogant, bullyish. If the U.S.

>cannot behave in partnership with its allies -- especially the Europeans

>-- it risks not only political alliance but BUSINESS, as well. Company

>leaders argued that they would rather not have to deal with US

>government attitudes about all sorts of multilateral treaties (climate

>change, intellectual property, rights of children, etc.) -- it's easier

>to just do business in countries whose governments agree with yours. And

>it's cheaper, in the long run, because the regulatory envornments match.

>War against Iraq is seen as just another example of the unilateralism.

>

>- For a minority of the participants there was another layer of

>AntiAmericanism that focused on moralisms and religion. I often heard

>delegates complain that the US "opposes the rights of children", because

>we block all treaties and UN efforts that would support sex education

>and condom access for children and teens. They spoke of sex education as

>a "right". Similarly, there was a decidedly mixed feeling about

>Ashcroft, who addressed the conference. I attended a small lunch with

>Ashcroft, and observed Ralph Reed and other prominent Christian

>fundamentalists working the room and bowing their heads before eating.

>The rest of the world's elite finds this American Christian behavior at

>least as uncomfortable as it does Moslem or Hindu fundamentalist

>behavior. They find it awkward every time a US representative refers to

>"faith-based" programs. It's different from how it makes non-Christian

>Americans feel -- these folks experience it as downright embarrassing.

>

>- When Colin Powell gave the speech of his life, trying to win

>over the nonAmerican delegates, the sharpest attack on his comments came

>not from Amnesty International or some Islamic representative -- it came

>from the head of the largest bank in the Netherlands!

>

>I learned that the only economy about which there is much enthusiasm is

>China, which was responsible for 77% of the global GDP growth in 2002.

>But the honcho of the Bank of China, Zhu Min, said that fantastic growth

>could slow to a crawl if China cannot solve its rural/urban problem.

>Currently 400 million Chinese are urbanites, and their average income is

>16 times that of the 900 million rural residents. Zhu argued China must

>urbanize nearly a billion people in ten years!

>

>I learned that the US economy is the primary drag on the global economy,

>and only a handful of nations have sufficient internal growth to thrive

>when the US is stagnating.

>

>The WEF was overwhelmed by talk of security, with fears of terrorism,

>computer and copyright theft, assassination and global instability

>dominating almost every discussion.

>

>I learned from American security and military speakers that, "We need

>to attack Iraq not to punish it for what it might have, but

>preemptively, as part of a global war. Iraq is just one piece of a

>campaign that will last years, taking out states, cleansing the planet."

>

>The mood was very grim. Almost no parties, little fun. If it hadn't been

>for the South Africans -- party animals every one of them -- I'd never

>have danced. Thankfully, the South Africans staged a helluva party, with

>Jimmy Dludlu's band rocking until 3am and Stellenbosch wines pouring

>freely, glass after glass after glass....

>

>These WEF folks are freaked out. They see very bad economics ahead, war,

>and more terrorism. About 10% of the sessions were about terrorism, and

>it's heavy stuff. One session costed out what another 9/11-type attack

>would do to global markets, predicting a far, far worse impact due to

>the "second hit" effect -- a second hit that would prove all the world's

>post-9/11 security efforts had failed. Another costed out in detail what

>this, or that, war scenario

>Would do to spot oil prices. Russian speakers argued that "failed

>nations" were spawning terrorists --- code for saying, "we hate

>Chechnya". Entire sessions were devoted to arguing which poses the

>greater asymmetric threat: nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

>

>Finally, who are these guys? I actually enjoyed a lot of my

>conversations, and found many of the leaders and rich quite charming and

>remarkably candid. Some dressed elegantly, no matter how bitter cold and

>snowy it was, but most seemed quite happy in ski clothes or casual

>attire. Women wearing pants was perfectly acceptable, and the elite is

>sufficiently

>Multicultural that even the suit and tie lacks a sense of dominance.

>Watching Bill Clinton address the conference while sitting in the hotel

>room of the President of Mozambique -- we were viewing it on closed

>circuit TV -- I got juicy blow-by=blow analysis of US foreign policy

>from a remarkably candid head of state. A day spent with Bill Gates

>turned out to be fascinating and fun. I found the CEO of Heinekin

>hilarious, and George Soros proved quite earnest about confronting AIDS.

>Vicente Fox -- who I had breakfast with -- proved sexy and smart like a

>--- well, a fox. David Stern (Chair of the NBA) ran up and gave me a

>hug.

>

>The world isn't run by a clever cabal. It's run by about 5,000

>bickering, sometimes charming, usually arrogant, mostly male people who

>are accustomed to living in either phenomenal wealth, or great personal

>power. A few have both. Many of them turn out to be remarkably naive --

>especially about science and technology. All of them are financially

>wise, though their ranks have thinned due to unwise tech-stock

>investing. They pay close heed to politics, though most would be happy

>if the global political system behaved far more rationally -- better for

>the bottom line. They work very hard, attending sessions from dawn to

>nearly midnight, but expect the standards of intelligence and analysis

>to be the best available in the entire world. They are impatient. They

>have a hard time reconciling long term issues (global wearming, AIDS

>pandemic, resource scarcity) with their daily bottomline foci. They are

>comfortable working across languages, cultures and gender, though white

>caucasian males still outnumber all other categories. They adore hi-tech

>gadgets and are glued to their cell phones.

>

>Welcome to Earth: meet the leaders.

>

>Ciao,

>Laurie

 

 

 

From: Mvw
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:00 AM
To: Devin
Cc: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Sea Monsters

 

Hi Devin

 

I'm South African, but feeling a little stateless at the moment - globalization at work.

 

I thought things got quite speedy on hover crafts at some point - not 100 knots though. 

 

According to a recent article I read in Wired magazine ( I think), conceptual work is been done on the largest plane ever to take the "sky".  It will rely on the surface effects at play when flying very low altitude, thus maximizing cargo capability.  I think it referred to your sea monster, but a quick search has not revealed the article.

 

I saw people-only ferries running between the Greek Isles that relied on some kind of ski-like mechanism to elevate itself above the water as it gathered speed.  This was 10 years ago, and its general appearance was not that new at the time.  I don't know how well they worked, but I vaguely remember a speed figure of 30 knots.  I have a rough concept based on that and more which I could run by you if interested.  I have no idea what might have been tried and/or discredited with that kind of system though.

 

Your saucer sounds very interesting.  I hope there shall soon be something to see.  At the very least you can make the cover of the National Inquirer!

 

Cheers,

Marius

 

 

 

From: Devin [devin@quasark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:01 PM
To: 'Gary S. Gevisser'; 'Mvw'
Subject: RE: Mice and men

 

Hi Marius:

Primarily funding issues rather than technical.

Of course, any vessel which remains on the surface will have challenges dampening waves in extremley elevated sea states.

An easy way to avoid that is low level flight as the Russians do with their Ukranian Sea Monster.

We in fact have a saucer shaped VTOL which we have flown in scale model; but the political hurdles of aircraft development are horrific.

In the short term, we are trying to alleviate the pain caused by the impact of serious vertical acceleration shocks which our sailors are

subjected to, to say nothing of the fuel savings associated with friction reduction.

The CE)/technologist is perfecting a scale demonstration model which we intend to secure the necessary funds to finish the full scale prototype,

and, or to sell the IP to one of several defense contractors with which we have already established good relations. Whichever comes first.

Dutch, Belgian or South African?

Ciao,

Devin

 

 

Devin S. Standard

President

QuasArk America, Inc.

964 5th Ave.,  Suites 231-235

San Diego, Ca 92101

USA

 

Tel: 858 337 1802

Fax:619 544 0993

Devin@quasark.com

 

 


From: Gary S. Gevisser [mailto:
gsg@sellnext.com]
Sent: 17. februar 2003
13:30
To: Mvw
Cc:
Devin Standard
Subject: Mice and men

 

Marius, Marie and I both felt your positive waves best reflected in the photo taken by the photographer who went light on the quality of his film. No doubt nothing could dampen our spirits this V Day after deciding to stop by your spot for a “last call” where Marie was undoubtedly the “show stopper” although her moves at Deco’s earlier in the evening got the uptight feeling even more depressed. No doubt this world needs more blues music with dancers who have all the right moves, two left-footed types like me need much help in making the right moves. I plan to enquire into dancing lessons this week.

 

I’m copying Devin Standard and perhaps he can explain to you more about what is dampening his efforts to break the world speed water record besides for the focus shifting to get folks at NASA to take off their sunglasses thinking that the son only shines on them and make the most of what little time is left for the space shuttle program and conduct the direct experiment which would surely prove that the speed of light increases through a vacuum much like it does when penetrating the minds of men who make mountains out of molehills that collapse with the smallest of earthquakes, those at the top having the furthest to fall.

 

Problems seem to begin when one relies on one’s government to throw money at projects taking the inventiveness out of inventors much the same way leaving a large inheritance dampens the enthusiasm of the next generation. The more I look at uptight engineering types like those folks who spent millions to get the ink in a pen to defy gravity while working in outer space, turning a blind eye to their Russian counterparts who had to make do with pencils as their government poured out the vodka dummying the masses, money without a “Gold Standard” simply a means to keep the downtrodden on the wrong sides of the track, the more convinced I am that in the process of the intellectual elite letting their formal education interfere with their learning they essentially opened up the aperture exposing their darkened mind to the bright lights, turning brains cells into poop that with gravity and the spine as a ladder ends up down the drain with “joy ride” specialists getting it in the shorts; mice-lice pretty much the same in terms of how they probably poop, wouldn’t you agree? Chunky cheese will do it, cellulite to boot[1].

 

By the way is it true that a drain turns differently south of the equator than it does north to mention little of what the brain drain has caused to places like South Africa?

 

I will also let Devin know that you have an interest in water craft to mention little of your “Stellenbosch” engineering credentials and with a name like Mari-us that couldn’t dampen Marie’s face that with each passing day seems to smile more and more, fakes to boot; soon a “wake up” call for everyone.

 

Gary

 

Ps – below are some more photos of the evenings outing.

 

  1. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/perfect-setting.gif
  2. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/boots-to-die-for.gif
  3. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/deco-bed.gif
  4. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/naked-in-bed.gif
  5. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/deco-toast.gif
  6. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/heart-throb.gif
  7. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/in-check-move.gif
  8. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/stand-out-move.gif
  9. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/stand-out-bar-look.gif
  10. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/pink-floor.gif
  11. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/couple-next-door.gif
  12. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/jeff-looking-good.gif
  13. http://nextraterrestrial.com/pdf/overexposed.gif

 

 

 


From: Mvw
Sent:
Sunday, February 16, 2003 11:18 PM
To:
gsg@sellnext.com
Subject:

 

Hi Gary

 

Saturday night with you and Marie was short, but invigorating.  Never know what can happen when someone needs room next to you for leftovers.

 

I checked out QuasArk with interest.  It looks promising, but did they hit some waves the system couldn't dampen?  Shortage of money and/or technical problems perhaps?

 

Hope we shall communicate.

 

Mvw

 



[1] The last hyperlink is a bronze casting cemented by the original owners into the back entrance to Stonehenge II, our rock cabin retreat.