From:
Sent:
To: Del Mar Times Editor - editor@delmartimes.net
Cc: rest;
Subject: The
Del Mar Times IS for Free Speech as long as it is not mine?
Dear
Jim,
I
had earlier today in anticipation of attending my 3rd Del Mar City
council meeting in all the 15 odd years I have been a resident of
One
incredible deal when you think in addition one gets a shoulder, upper back,
neck, head and to top it off the most incredible facial massage for all of $28
[Twenty eight United States Mighty Dollars] that has me thinking of renting one
of the chairs should one of these old timers, only half though, do the
switchblade facial hair shave, were to retire and when there are no customers,
take a break from surfing The Internet to get not only the lowest bid but to
have each of them agree to not only talk up my websites but to pay for each
email address.
And
of course I thought about how if each person they “sign up” then provides me
with email addresses to compensate the old timers and probably no more than
“tTOo” [sic] generations that follow, their estates in an instant becoming news
worthy of say a weekly column in each of your owner’s publications?
Interesting
if say a woman wanted a bikini shave
Or
Better
yet an Iron Man athlete in Mr On’s shape if able to attract more
customers suggesting they also throw in for the same price depending of course
on the “magnetism” of the athlete, removing all their chest hair?
I
found out upon my return that the City Council have now cancelled tonight’s
scheduled meeting and of course why would anyone think I had anything to do
with this coincidence since, according Jane Kelley, former New Hampshire State
Representative and "Honory" [sic] member of the Teamsters Union I “hide behind the skirts of” my “poor
wife.”
Now
wouldn’t you if
Before
cutting to the chase,
so important we not lose sight of today’s headline news in the LA Times about
the level of anxiety being felt by the Chinese youth thinking they might be
left behind, several people from around the world letting me know how if
fortune and fame were my immediate goal then I should take out the tiniest of
ads in any Chinese newspaper and explain in simple Chinese how easy it would be
for all the 1.3 billion odd Chinese to not only acquire for next to nothing all
of the world what they don’t already own but to get the rest of the world’s
population to be their slave laborers, not in 50 years or 49 years not even 5
years but rather less time than it takes for them to raise their currency to no
more than 50% to its realistic level WERE
IT NOT for our great most honorable President George W. Bush in “command and control” of all the Armed
Forces of the United States of America.
Now,
this instant get on your hands and knees and pray to whoever you wish including
for all our care your airborne particles of feces collected on the hair of your
upper lip that no one does anything stupid that would interfere with the
“overwhelming and superior” Light-G-D-Forces assisting our great President and
his stellar administration spread democracy to all 4 corners of the globe.
This
past Wednesday I provided you with a “Letter to the Editor” which I as
well as a good number of people on my email list which consists of a
statistically valid sampling of the world’s literate population as well as now
more than about 100 residents and holiday makers here in Del Mar, all seeming
to agree without me, however, getting from anyone a sworn affidavit, signed
“under penalty of perjury” that not only was-is “Flirting with Danger” timely but
very newsworthy.
I
ended my 1042 word communiqué which can now also be viewed on the DAAC [DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel] Yahoo message board by reminding you to get back to me ASAP in terms of whether you would go
ahead and publish my 260 word letter in this week’s Del Mar Times, to mention little again of you
not giving me any indication other than your very poor body language that you
had given the green light to a Marty Bressler to “trash”
me, MB’s
only credential I can tell from his 600 word letter in this past week’s DMT which you said had “already gone to print” was that he is a
homeowner in Del Mar.
Now
perhaps I should have been more specific in terms of use of the acronym ASAP but shucks what can I say?
Below
is my first edition edit response to MB and need I remind you that “altho-ugh” [sic] I
am not a lawyer-liar feel free to share this with both the publisher as well as
the attorneys for the owners of the Del Mar Times and their string of newspaper
publications not to forget their liability insurance carrier-s.
Response
to “Winn’s
forum view off base”.
Title: The
Mr.
Bressler,
Your
personal attack on columnist Mr. Winn, “if
not the oldest in attendance, had the whitest, the hoarist of heads” may in fact be the most
accurate of your statements.
As
you would know proof is a function of evidence, the better the evidence the
better the proof.
Before
attempting to debate any subject you should make certain you have an in depth
understanding of what it involves?
For
your edification I simply beat councilmember Abarbanel to a pulp leaving it up
to columnist
Because
I was not as familiar with the facts as Mr. Winn I had in fact decided to keep
my big mouth shut but when I heard councilmember Abarbanel comment on the title
deed on the property in question containing “embarrassing” material the councilmember
using either the word “drunks” or “alcoholics” who would
be prevented from purchasing such a property the hair on my back started to
rise and before I knew it I was once again wearing my “Risk Assessment” hat wondering why Mr. Abarbanel would
bring up such irrelevant facts, if not to distract the audience for his real
agenda.
In
my RA services which involve being
brought in at times by the most successful and might I add the most rapacious SCALs [Shareholder
Class
Action
Litigators]
who specialize in white collar crime specifically Wall Street crime where the
biggest crooks build in to their “cost of sales” the “cost
of getting caught” requiring the most “skilled and experienced”
litigators “to-get-her” [sic] with my
help to
respond to fast balls thrown at or near head, one of the things we look
for in addition to what is said and not said are the distractions, the smoke
screens such as “The title deed has very specific provisions preventing so and
sos, blah blah” [sic].
So
naturally I saw the most terrific opening to question councilmember Abarbanel
to determine whether in fact he was now wanting to add “clown” to his
Curriculum Vitae or suffering from some form of dementia since pretty much
anyone with a morsel of a neuron firing in the space between their ears would
know that so long as someone has the money in this “dog eat god aspartame”
[sic] world whether they are a crook let alone a drunk would have no bearing on
them becoming the proud owners of such a sought after piece of property or was
Councilmember simply attempting to play a game of chess with the audience made
up of mostly old folks.
Since
I am also rather well schooled in the business of corporate restructurings-work
outs I wanted to know WHAT ELSE Councilmember found “EMBARRASSING” and
to help him out as he attempted to avoid answering what I considered to be a
fair question since he was the one who raised the point of “alcoholism” being
just one of the things he found again “EMBARRASING” when reviewing the title
deeds of this property in question, whether there was a provision preventing
either a Jewish
Or
Black
person from becoming the proud owner of such a property.
Why
not flush out everything given how apparent it was that this was one big
orchestrated circus to give the public a sense there was “open debate” in the
Peoples Republic of Del Mar.
Bear
in mind not only was I born and raised in the communist state of South Africa NOT under the “command and control” of the Apartheid
Afrikaner Government but us “Sly English” as in the DAAC [DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel] I have also owned property in the Peoples Republic of Santa
Monica, such matters I have been pointing out for some time bothering a number
of folks all over the world who like the majority of our councilmembers prefer
not to be questioned.
The
fact that the Editor of the Del Mar Times would choose to EXLCUDE my name in an article written by one of its
columnists that paints me in a favorable light on this same subject matter and
then allows someone such as yourself who writes in has a number of facts wrong
including me being “a frequent attendee at meetings on city matters” to INCLUDE my name in a letter that
trashes my very good name is telling of the bias of the Del Mar Times Editor as
well as its Publisher and owners unless of course columnist and failed
politician
For
the record, as best I recall, I have attended 2 city council meetings and this
one charade town hall meeting in the 15 odd years I have been a resident of
I
have suggested to the Editor of the Del Mar Times that he, the publisher as
well as the new owners of the Del Mar Times in an effort to mitigate their
damages to my very good name publish both this letter as well as the very
timely piece I presented to the editor this past Wednesday titled “Flirting
with Danger” which deals with personal paths leading to the ocean from
cliffs of Del Mar, a significant risk that in my judgment the City of Del Mar
including Councilmember Drucker who daily passing by CHOOses to ignore, such actions will I am quite certain go a
long way towards refuting the Del Mar
Times IS for Free Speech as long as it is NOT mine.
[Word count 1961]
-----Original
Message-----
From:
Sent:
To: Editor@delmartimes.net
Cc: rest;
Subject: FW: Flirting with Danger
Jim,
Below
are the changes to the second paragraph that my wife felt would “spice
things up” without ruffling feathers:
Paragraph
2 which begins, “Nothing wrong…” to be replaced with:
While erecting the path nothing wrong with landing a hand to a
young female distracted by this false sense of security.
Please consider the “timeliness”…---…
