From: Gary S. Gevisser

Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Chuck Gizoni
Cc: rest
Subject: FW: Follow up - "When the dialogue becomes too monologues it is the beginning of the end" [sic] or [non-sic]?

Chuck, I am disappointed to say the least not so much with the fact that Jim Gibson has yet to return my email simply asking whether I have his correct email address but you simply mentioning to Amos [mad.w@prodigy.net] that “I still want to meet with Gary” [sic].

Now I use the “sic” because I cannot recall exactly the words Amos used when describing his last meeting with you at church this weekend but what sickens me is the failure to provide Amos with the essence of our conversations, i.e. how does you and I getting together have anything to do with what we have now been discussing ad-nausea for sum too weeks?

I only wanted to have you around to be a “witness” to the conversations between Mr. Jim Gibson who is running as a Republican for the California State Assembly and myself, my believing that having you around would be as well served as my wearing a wire tap and/or hearing device, agree?

What exactly in our communications did you not understand?

None of us have anytime for bullshit and of course no one, in my opinion, likes to have more “fun & games” than I do but as long as I have first taken care of business, agree?

For you and I to meet to shoot the breeze accomplishes exactly what?

You know perfectly well as this point that Jim Gibson is doing nothing more than “ducking & diving” otherwise you would have got back to me by now to let me know that you have got off your rocker, motored over to his house, read him the riot act and had him at least respond to my very simple email.

I am copying Mr. Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. on this email who is a rather important person in my life, albeit a Democratic Party supporter, someone though who is grounded in the cardinal rules of never, lying, stealing or cheating and you should know having spent time with someone as incredible as Amos Wright that it is unforgivable to steal someone’s time since you can never make up for lost time, as opposed to making money which is something people like Amos Wright, Jeffrey R. Krinsk and I know a thing or tTOo about.

What goes up must come down but if you are “lean and mean” without being unkind, caring mostly for those genuinely in need then I believe you have a shot at reaching the promised land.

In my opinion, the path you, Jim Gibson et al are taking is all geared toward you coming back to earth as enzymes to clean up my dog’s poop.

Good Day,

Gary S. Gevisser

The Pisser

Ps-I am now off to our kid’s soccer practice over at Carmel Creek, my suggestion is that you grab hold of Jim Gibson pronto, have him place his fund raising on hold and who knows perhaps even Jeffrey R. Krinsk and his wife, Campbell Soup, may throw him a bone.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:37 PM
To: mike@michaelmoore.com – main actor in Bowling For Columbine.
Cc: David Pollak (dpollak@ubspw.com); dianah@nytimes.com; schankula@michaelmoore.com; Kingdelmar (Kingdelmar@aol.com); Devinq@Nethere. Com (devinq@nethere.com)
Subject: Follow up - "When the dialogue becomes too monolgues it is the begiinning of the end" [sic] or [non-sic]?