From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: Djmemm@aol.com
Cc: rest;
Subject: RE: Next Symposium {:}....4th Grade...{:}
Dennis – rather than waste a nickel possibly playing telephone tag may I be so bold as to suggest u can help yourself as well as me by not simply listening but sharing this communication with whomever u think it appropriate.
Help me tho, better understand why one of the most top rated business journalists in the world, a best selling author with access to the top corporate executives in the world would not bother wanting to discuss with me whatever became of this medical device company that turned the world upside down some 7 odd year ago?.
Let me first give u some background on Diana Henriques of the New York Times who I first became aware of when she wrote a feature story in the New York Times in December 1996 detailing a landmark multi-million dollar class action lawsuit jury award that was seen by many including the Wall Street Journal as “opening the floodgates” to some 2,000 class action lawsuits that were pending at the time.
It is also important to note that I have never once, to the best of my knowledge, either privately, in print
Or
Verbally, again to the best of my knowledge, referred to Ms. Henriques as ugly.
Furthermore, in her best selling book The White Sharks of Wall Street Ms. Henriques goes out of her way in the introduction talking about her battles with carpal tunnel syndrome which falls into the broad category of repetitive stress diseases which Judge Jack B. Weinstein referred to in his rather incredible decision some 4 months later in late April 1997 when this rather famous Federal Judge overturned this landmark case crediting me, the Chief Executive Officer of this rather remarkable company funded in no small measure by one of the wealthiest people in the world with coming forward and providing the irrefutable “smoking gun proof” of “malfeasance” by the plaintiffs and their attorneys.
Now although Judge Jack B. Weinstein may not have used such strong language while also paying his respects to Ms. Henriques for writing the article that first got my attention the message he sent the lazy crooks and their white shoes attorneys was patently clear,
“Don’t mess with the Rattlesnake!”
Now
build into the equation how when eRaider.com was just getting going on their
epic voyage Ms. Henriques wrote a rather well thought through
article on its co-founders Martin
Stoller and Professor Aaron Brown of the Yeshiva University in New York
City and given how much good publicity Ms. Henriques got from Judge Jack B.
Weinstein’s reversal of the landmark case that put quite a damper on litigators
all around the world to mention little of the deep breath it allowed insurance
carriers such as American
International Group [AIG] no need I assume for me to get into
the area of “reserving” which just coincidentally has the exact
lettering of “reversing”, it was only to be expected
that my buddy Di
Pal
Di
“
my
response was obviously appropriate enough for Di
Both Di
Could I stop you?
Bearing in mind my rather straightforward question;
May I share it with you?
Which consisted of 6 words with a 27 word preamble;
I have "smoking gun" proof that a group of business people in conjunction
with the highest-ranking members of the Democratic Party have hi-jacked the
political system.
Again my question, can u help me figure this all out in 11 words
Or
less given the requirements set by Mr. Glenn Shapiro for writing a book geared toward 4th graders and up who have not allowed their formal education to interfere with their learning, not to forget the duplicity of folks on the far right, at least one member of the NRCC not wanting to carry the “football”
Later
-----Original Message-----
From: Djmemm@aol.com [mailto:Djmemm@aol.com]
Sent:
To:
Subject: Re: Next Symposium {:}....twist the testicles of former
President Bill "Wallp...
If and when you should need to speak with me, please feel free to contact me. I
am there to listen and help if I can.
Thank you for considering me.
Dennis Mieskoski
P.S. I did not get any positive responses with respect to your