From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:51 AM PT
To: Mr. Byrne – Risdon Hosegood.
Cc: rest;
Marie Dion Gevisser;
Subject: WE WANT BEER...observation..it
is not reasonable....Seacrest - Dave Clark - James Sunderland[Scanned]
Dear Mr.
Byrne,
I had more
things to think about than Mr. Clark while riding my very fast motorcycle to
Photo above which
hangs in a
This “WE WANT BEER” demonstration against
Prohibition made up of mostly 40,000 men dancing to a 100 bands and there were “sum” [sic] women involved as well in the
organizing, was held in Newark, New Jersey, the headquarters of the
DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel’s Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals.
a number of
interesting, very friendly, not in the least bit financially rich but
extraordinarily aware people living in what at one time was oil rich
And might I
add I was riding in both directions rather fast all the while consuming
significant amounts of calories also just being constantly aware of the risks
of “safety” not just to myself but to others who may not be either as competent
on the road or in the least bit caring about the next person bearing in mind
the one thing we all have in common is our agreeing that when we cut through
all the nonsense chatter if we hadn’t discovered oil and there was wasn’t a
human overpopulation problem, the two going hand in hand, we would “all” get
along not just fine but in all likelihood have less time on our hands to come
up with insensitive expressions such as “If
you are looking for a handout just look at the end of your arm!”
But of
course not all of us see the benefits of “sharing” especially the things we
don’t have to work for beginning with that very small but vocal minority who
benefit greatly from the masses overpopulating on overworked and increasingly
less farmlands and such individuals only care about themselves, not a care in
the world that their selfishness will ever get revealed in “real time” to the
rest of the world including their “loved ones” who by simply looking at their
“deafening silences” on The Diamond Invention also show their true colors;
birds of a feather flock together.
Pulling it
all together is not in the least bit difficult as one first pulls apart how Mr.
Clark kept harping about me being responsible for getting a gas certificate for
all the alterations he has been making without my approval, such a requirement
“appearing out of nowhere” in The Lease agreement.
Not to
mention you should have no issue with me bringing in what you may consider
“extraneous material” bearing in mind that another 24 hours has passed and my
one “asset” remains not only “at risk” despite Mr. Clark now having paid
August’s rent, I have to make the most of this “lost time” bearing in mind that
not only am I not “all about money” money is simply a way for us to keep “track
of things” in a world exponentially running out of oil.
Not to
mention I have this thing about those who forget who paid for Hitler’s diamonds
as well as gas that wiped out not just a good number of my relatives but the
very best of the Jewish independent thinkers who did in fact just “give up” as
they looked around and said to themselves, “Where do we run now that we have escaped
out of Auschwitz and no one wants to believe our stories?”
Please look
into this gas matter immediately and it may mean that you should immediately
speak with Mr. Sunderland to ask whether this so important matter which Mr.
Clark kept bringing up came up when he met with Mr. Clark, again on my behalf,
and then get back to me with an updated letter to Mr. Clark without any further
delay.
Not to
mention Mr. Clark sending me an email warning me that British Justice would
“sumhow” [sic] favor him.
Time is of
the essence.
Sincerely,
Gary S.
Gevisser
Ps – You may have noticed that it is not only former
Attorney John Ashcroft who I was just writing about the other day who is suddenly
front page news, the joint military exercises between China and Russia may or
may not be a good thing given how such exercises involve very significant uses
of oil which does not in the least distract smart military intelligence
services from Mr. Putin who exploded a miniature neutron bomb in downtown
London when dealing with a Russian “dissident” Litvinenko while mostly letting
us know that he was responsible given how while most Russians congregate to eat
and drink in their kitchens are not exactly equipped to build delivery vehicles
containing polonium 210 where the assassin while carrying traces escapes
unharmed.
In due
course I will be sharing with you a mobile email address of Mr. Friedman who
you should contact if you do not hear back from me
within 24 hours.
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 9:27 AM
To: Catherine Blundell
Cc: Marie Dion Gevisser;
Subject: OBERVATIONS...it is not reasonable....Seacrest - Dave Clark - James
Sunderland[Scanned]
Dear Mr.
Byrne,
I am fine
with the letter although quite frankly I am mostly focused right now on
responding to a former United States Justice Department Nazi Prosecutor who
wants everyone to believe that I am insane while feeling it is obviously not
insane for him to be both reading and corresponding with me.
I want to
make sure though that you have thought through everything in laying the
groundwork to get Mr. Clark out of my property as soon as possible, today would
be fine.
According
to his former landlords, Enterprise Inn PLC and their attorneys, Wragge &
Co LLP, Mr. Clark caused some 400,000 quid in damages, not to mention the time
and energies expended to fix up the Red Lion’s premises, to mention little of
the Enterprise Inn’s opportunity costs.
It is
possible that Mr. Clark saw his “next best alternative” when leaving
The Red Lion owned by Enterprise Inn PLC to simply steal anything that wasn’t
fused to the earth’s core which he is now storing at Seacrest.
Would this
make me, my wife, you, your children, your grandchildren, in other words the 7
billion odd of us who might read this accessories to a crime?
As best I
know Mr. Clark has yet to employ a chef at Seacrest which brings me to the name
change as well as in whose name is the liquor license?
There
appear to be 3 occupants at Seacrest and yet only two are named in The Lease
which may or may not be a violation, please also advise and yes please let me
know what your great grand children think since it seems that Risdonhosegood
have this penchant for letting those within days of retirement handle my
account?
Please
understand I have nothing against those who wear adult diapers unless of course
I am paying for them and therefore I should be at least allowed to suggest an
alternative and what exactly is so wrong when you all arrive in your offices,
no longer having to fight the weather to simply strip to the bare essentials,
at least this way your clients such as me will get to at least get a kick.
Time to
move on.
Again, back
to the name change Waterfront that I did not approve but in not letting me know
it begs the question of what Mr. Clark was up to which at a minimum talks to
his integrity which I would think is still important to the Crown?
I think in
retrospect the letter has to be a whole lot stronger letting him know that we
intend to come on to the premises to inspect very carefully what alterations
have been made as well as look at the books bearing in mind that no doubt Mr.
Clark is doing a lot of purchases in cash which begs more questions including
why don’t we have the Director of the Inland Revenue Service join us in
inspecting his books NOW and not wait until the end of the summer season when
there is every reason to believe Mr. Clark will be even less forthcoming.
In other
words, time is of the essence and for the life of me I cannot understand all
your tardiness.
What
exactly was Mr. Sunderland doing that benefited me when he visited with Mr.
Clark?
In other
words, following partition and reorganization of the kitchen area are all
Health & Safety requirements met (including new customer toilet)?
Who exactly
did the alteration work and were the materials used “up to standard”?
In view of
much larger area used commercially have business rates been amended?
Where
exactly is Mr. Clark in making arrangements for the necessary external
refurbishment (Painting etc)?
As you read
The Lease does it allow the current usage of premises which appears to be
mainly a pub?
Furthermore,
why are 20 different signs displayed at The Waterfront and on adjoining public
lands and thoroughfares where surplus materials are also kept.
Let me give
you a quick summary of my “observations”.
Work was
carried out with second hand material and stock recovered from the Red Lion
which may have already been included in previous trading accounts. Supplies are
being bought with cash and often not from normal commercial sources and this
may mean that figures are extremely difficult to verify and possibly grossly
understated.
Please
respond ASAP.
Sincerely,
Gary S.
Gevisser
From:
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE: IT IS NOT REASONABLE FOR MR. CLARK TO BE WITHOUT...---...: Seacrest
- Dave Clark - James Sunderland[Scanned]
Dear Mr Gevisser
Thank you for your recent e-mails and I do
apologise for the delay in responding.
I have spoken on the telephone to your colleague
Valerie Costa who I believe keeps an eye on the property for you. I
understand that Mr Clark is persistently late in paying his rent and may well
have made alterations to the property.
I am attaching a letter I propose to send
to Mr Clark and Ms White dealing with these matters and I should be grateful if
you will confirm your approval or otherwise as the case may be of the terms of
this letter before I send it.
Yours sincerely