From:
Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: Walt@help411.com
Subject: Gary Gevisser - unlawful detainer
While rather wordy I think it helpful to provide you
with a detailed chronology of events that led to Greg Beckham deciding to
“strike out” at Marie and me that might help you make a stiletto
complaint cutting out all my emotion.
Everything is well documented in terms of how Ms.
Clark and Marie and I went about resolving Ms. Clark’s extraordinarily
uncivil behavior; more importantly Mr. Beckham’s first reaction to my
informing him of Ms. Clark ‘s out of control behavior was to let me know
that he had issues himself with her, that he knew she had a problem with
alcohol and that he thought she was being “medicated” but was more
incredulous was that he was placing the burden of bringing her “under
control” on me since I had rented the converted garages for some 4 years
previous to Ms. Clark and had dealt rather effectively with the tenant who had
lived in the main section of the house that we now live in, the previous tenant
there for about 12 years, Beckham letting me know in so many words that it
should be “as easy as pie” dealing with Ms. Clark to mention little
of me paying a $100 less a month than Ms. Clark after Beckham spent some
$30,000 “improving” the living conditions of the illegally
converted garages, pocketing for himself for “overseeing” the
construction-insulation which made little or no difference some $8,000 which
brings me back to the point of the 18 month lease.
Mr. Beckham gave me his word and I had every reason
to trust him based on how well we had got along during the 4 years I rented
from him previously, taking a “breather” for just a year, that he
saw no reason why we wouldn’t be able to stay in the house for the same
period as the previous tenant if not longer given how excellent a tenant I was
living in the illegally converted garages dealing with all sorts of problems
not only the tenant above but Sam Haim’s and Beckham’s friend who
lived in the other house on the same lot, both Sam Haim and “Mr.
Mark”, I don’t recall his last name, not exactly your “role
models” given how extraordinarily poorly they behaved particularly when
dealing with the opposite sex, Mr. Mark and Mr. Haim like Mr. Beckhham very
much into drugs which didn’t stop Mr. Mark in fact being granted a
“license” via his foster care status to “abuse” a young
female teenager under his care, to mention little of when Mr. Mark eventually
decided to “run for it” he pulled off a $40,000 insurance scam
which both Mr. Beckham as well as the next neighbor had “good
cause” to bring to the attention of the authorities including the
insurance investigators to mention little of my letting them all know prior to
Mr. Mark heading off I believe it was to Thailand that I wasn’t going to
put up with such debauchery, also knowing perfectly well it would be rather
difficult for me to prove such matters in a court of law since it would be
based on information Mr. Haim provided to me during one of his “talkative
moments” which brings me to the next point.
When Mr. Haim eventually left giving according
Beckham not only no notice but owing some $800 in rent Beckham never pursued
Mr. Haim who obviously felt comfortable that Beckham would not pursue him which
leads me to my next point.
Marie and I have every reason to believe that
Beckham never communicated with the Knutsons our intentions for a long term
lease and for us willing to invest more monies to improve the living conditions,
this unique property which Beckham had difficulty in renting having a lot of
deferred maintenance, the property today looking a whole lot better given all
the time, money and energy we have invested making it “show” rather
well, especially for race reason to mention little of Beckham letting me know
also in one of his “talkative moments” that given his recent
“bachelor” status and concern about the real estate market he could
see himself selling his house and moving in to this spot and to have the illegally
converted garages available for his 2 older children which brings me to my next
point.
I have photos of Beckham very recently chipping away
at one of the personal paths on the cliffs of Del Mar leading to the beach,
Beckham confiding in me that this was his ingenious way of “picking up
chicks”, not in the least bit concerned about the liability exposure to
the City of Del Mar should someone “slip and fall” matters I happen
to be intimately familiar with since not only do I know a thing or
“tTOo” [sic] about the insurance industry having been the COO and
CFO of the largest marketing-publishing company in the property and casualty
insurance industry back in the 1980s I happened to have been the CEO of a
medical device company that was credited by Federal Court Judge Jack B.
Weinstein in his decision to reverse a landmark multi-million dollar repetitive
stress injury jury award based on the evidence my company provided that mainly
talked to the “malfeasance” on the part of the plaintiffs and their
lawyers who failed to provide the defense, Digital Equipment Corporation, of
material evidence in their possession that at a minimum talked to the
“lack of integrity” of the plaintiffs which brings me to my next
point.
I can in fact cut to the chase rather quickly when
need be but I believe there are times when it is necessary to lay out carefully
and methodically all the evidence allowing one to go “back and
forth” with ease without having to read much if anything “in
between the lines” since proof is a function of evidence, the better the
evidence the better the proof which brings me to my next point.
I am quite confident that not only do we have the
evidence in our favor but when up on the stand addressing issues of “who
to believe” we will be able to prove Beckham is an absolute scoundrel who
in playing things extraordinarily “fast and loose” with Marie and
me, the City of Del Mar as well as having “snowed” the owners of
this property the Knutsons who I am not prepared to declare them
“saints” but more likely simply full of themselves and not wanting
to see Beckham for what he is since they have m
Beckham admits in writing that he has thumbed his
nose at the City of Del Mar and yet the city are taking their time in holding
his feet to the fire, it looks more and more like the city is also corrupt and
perhaps should be named as co-defendants in a counter lawsuit which brings me
to my next point.
I believe it is in our best interests which involves
primarily getting an extended lease to bring the Knutsons into a “reality
check” by hitting them “square between the eyes” with a
lawsuit that contains a complaint that leaves nothing to the imagination of how
their property m
I have yet to approach the City of Del Mar with
Beckham digging not only the “graves” of all the
residents-taxpayers of Del Mar should someone slip and fall as he provides
folks with nothing but a false sense of security, but his own grave.
To be crystal clear, as one goes back to read-listen
to the message he left on my voicemail on June 3rd following me
confronting him as he passed by our other rental property and I should add,
stinking of pot, why he had not responded to our calls to address Ms.
Clark’s “attack” on my wife 3 days prior that resulted in us
calling 911 there is not only his acknowledgement that Ms. Clark is a
“problem” tenant and saying we can remain for the duration of the
lease but more importantly the other “information” he “shared
with me” in addition to my willingness to go to the City of Del Mar with
the illegally converted garages, again his words:
“Really
it very unfortunate situation to see someone who I have let into my life on a
personal level take information or things that were between us and then
threaten me with it to intimidate me to act the way you would like me to act
for you”.
Beckham’s “strategies
and tactics” of trying to seduce women while seemingly
irrelevant are in my humble opinion so incredibly telling of this monster of a
human being and shouldn’t be difficult for a “jury of our peers”
to get their “arms around” particularly as he CHOOSES
[the photos I have as well as my other landlord serving as an eye witness to
Beckham carrying the spade coming back up the cliff] to go about in the
“heat of the day” digging away at the cliff, every so often while
blocking the path extending a hand to a “damsel in distress” to
mention little of how again in one of Beckham’s “talkative
moments” he told Marie and me how “proud” he was that only
just recently while vacationing with his daughter in Hawaii she, around 20
years old, participated in getting “high” with him and his druggy
friends.
Back on July 6th I submitted the
following to the Mar Times as a “Letter to the Editor” and despite
it being “timely” and in the “best interests” of all
the residents of
Flirting
with Danger
It’s easy to look at
anything superficially especially those who dig out steps along the cliffs of
While erecting the path
nothing wrong with “landing a hand” [sic] to a young female
distracted by this false sense of security.
The road to hell is NOT
necessarily paved with bad intentions but when one considers that in the end
this world is all about money then surely we should be looking at the fact that
while we ticket people who walk their unleashed dogs on what is essentially
railroad property very much falling apart, WHAT IF someone
slips breaks their neck, left a quadriplegic while the digger of all our graves
appears to do the right thing helping out a carefully orchestrated scene not
necessarily all geared to attract a damsel in distress?
Okay lets not worry about
lawsuits and the Del Mar City council somehow finding the money to settle
multiple class action lawsuits WHAT ABOUT the
damage to the cliff if more people under the guise of civil duty were to create
their own paths not just the less than a handful that currently exist inviting
more erosion to some of the better surfing spots.
Why is it asking so much of
those perhaps not in the best of shape to walk the path at
Careful should we all be of
those who flirt with danger?
“Risk
Assessment” is my business