From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:02 PM
To: Ghurst, attorney for Dr. John Ben Stewart
Cc: rest

Subject: Matters relating to...

Dear Mr. Hurst,

My attorney Mr. Ashworth has requested that I don’t communicate directly with you or Detective Steele in that there is “nothing to be gained” and more importantly, that I run the risk of more of my writings being taken out of context.

With that said, I know for a fact that I have the truth on my side and although I consider Mr. Ashworth an excellent attorney, when it comes to the thing that matters most to me, i.e. my reputation I feel it necessary to let you know clearly how I feel without anything being lost in the translation.

With that said, I understand from Mr. Ashworth that you have provided the courts with a declaration to the effect that the only declaration you have from Ms. Marie Dion Stewart, your client’s former second wife is, an unsigned declaration that spells a lot of things out pretty clearly, wouldn’t you agree? In my email to you on October 4^th I ended with the following:

“Ps – if in fact you have an unsigned Declaration by Marie Dion Stewart laying out the ever more transparent nature of her twice divorced former husband … please would you be so kind as to provide it to Mr. James Ashworth. I will assume you will keep any future communications with any other member of the Ashworth family strictly personal.”

With that said, I heard something in a phone conversation with Mr. Ashworth that seemed to catch him by surprise, that the judge in this case, Judge Hendrix, “seems to have taken a rather negative view towards you…” This statement has me concerned given the fact that I assumed all judges would be impartial and reluctant to raise even an eyebrow without hearing the other side’s position. I seem to recall making it perfectly clear to Judge Hendrix at the start of the proceedings on September 26th that I was seeking “a continuance” in order to arrange my own counsel, adding words to the effect that I was surprised that Dr. Stewart had decided to substitute in an attorney and not giving more thought to what would be a more gentlemanly way to resolve the conflict.

With that said, I am not all that surprised that “Dr. Stewart has decided not to settle matters outside of court” which is what I was led to believe is what has caused the delay in our responding to your naked assertions of my misconduct, reason being that so far it seems Dr. Stewart has everything going his way. Not only has he been able to get a TRO issued against me, a restraining order that includes my coming into contact with his second former wife’s children albeit without the input of his second former wife who has joint custody of the children, more importantly, to me at least, is the fact that if anyone took a careful look at exactly what Dr. Stewart first signed under oath on September 11^th any reasonable person would see that there were significant disconnects in his allegations to mention little of him describing me as 5 foot 11 inches and weighting in at 180 pounds when in fact I am about 5’8” and a trim 140 pounds.

With that said, I may have missed a thing or too the judge had to say given my focus on all the things you had told your client he had done wrong including no doubt how he so suspiciously left out those all-important 7 words of mine contained in the email to a third party which actually read;

“In the end we will get rid of all those who usurp their power including those who I detest the most…..evil doesn’t come with a pointed tail and pitched fork.”

With that said, a careful reading of my emails, which are all part and parcel of the book I am writing, Manager Minute One has my thoughts on this subject very clear, those thoughts being;

I detest those who derive great satisfaction in exceeding the limits of their small authority, i.e. evil doesn’t come with a pointed tail and pitched fork.

With that said, a simple reading of the Mission Statement of one of the 78 odd websites I am in the process of launching says a lot not just about me but why someone like Dr. Stewart would be concerned about the truth being revealed to an ever expanding audience to mention in passing my ongoing “call to arms” that the problems of the world have nothing to do with race, color, economics or religions, only poor parental religious teachings; that our whole purpose at NextraterresTrial is, in addition to helping folks resolve conflict without going the lawsuit route, to empower the youth who are our future, to parent the parents who need the most help, and of course with that comes added responsibilities.

With that said, I see no reason for me to believe that even though both Jonathan and Danielle have now confirmed to their mother that they see me as no threat, given, however, the sadness to mention little of the embarrassment that would come from telling the truth which would be at odds with their father’s naked [assertions] they might feel compelled to lie or perhaps even equivocate. Ms. Marie Dion Stewart’s decision to communicate directly with the children had perhaps some measure to do with Ms. Nancy McFarland whose is a non-practicing attorney advising her of the “need to take charge, my husband... ” Ms. Nancy’s husband, Mr. Jim McFarland as you know is not only a practicing lawyer here in California but he also witnessed Ms. Marie Dion Stewart’s will back on January 3^rd of this year.

With that said, doesn’t that will tell you something Mr. Hurst about what an amazing woman Ms. Marie Dion Stewart really is that she really doesn’t need a former lawyer whose son tells racist jokes to guide Ms. Marie Dion Stewart in terms of what is the right thing to do? Yes, Mr. Hurst a lot of things will eventually come out at trial including how little Ms. Marie Dion Stewart trusts her former husband to mention just in passing her so very meaningful New Year’s resolution, wouldn’t you agree? Yet you Mr. Hurst saw nothing wrong in trying to strong-arm Ms. Marie Dion Stewart in turning against me, wouldn’t you agree Mr. Attorney? In other words, what would Judge Ashworth think of your conduct to mention little of your client’s passive aggressive behavior that surfaced in full bloom on September 8^th before he went [3 days later] with son in tow on of all days September 11^th to commit such an un-American Act.

With that said, Mr. Hurst wouldn’t you also agree that your sending the FBI and Detective Steele to my home once you saw that your efforts to control your client’s former wife had failed, border on the reckless, at a minimum, to mention little about the fact that your client sent me an email 3 days after receiving the TRO which was as much a violation of the TRO as was my email in response, to mention little of how this TRO had been both maliciously and fraudulently obtained? So what do you make of your client bringing the children in to the middle of the dispute knowing full I would be hard pressed to even call them as witnesses given the fact that I have no legal rights, to them, that is?

With that said, Mr. Hurst, make no mistake I fully understand my legal rights to a fair and impartial courtroom setting.

With that said, I am instructing Mr. Ashworth to have no more direct communications with you under any circumstances and that I am to vet any and all communications before they leave his office.

With that said, it is possible that Mr. Ashworth has already left for the weekend without getting back to me that he had received written confirmation from you that would give him more time to respond to the false charges. In the event that you and Mr. Ashworth do not have an understanding as to these matters please feel free to submit this email directly to Judge Hendrix and this time include the signed declaration from Ms. Marie Dion Stewart as well as all the hyperlinks. If in fact you have an unsigned declaration then I have much bigger problems with my computer security system than I realized. Just like you added and or deleted a few letters/code in getting into my website’s Index so it is possible you could have done the same with my laptop unless someone else provided you with an unsigned copy. Ms. Marie Dion Stewart assures me that she would not have been the person to have done so.

With that said, may I suggest you read over the weekend this week’s edition of the Willis Brother column that appears in the Del Mar Times. It is titled, “Take a chance.”

Finally, I do not plan on having any more contact with either of the children until this matter is fully resolved. I have told Mr. Ashworth that I will not accept a penny less than $1 million for the harm done to my reputation to mention little of my lost opportunity cost.

Sincerely,

Gary S. Gevisser