DRAFT OF ONE PAGE FLYER-MAILER
City of
Put on your rose colored
glasses and get a drink. Numb yourself in front of the TV. The
Attention: Mr. Bressler –
Your
personal attack in response to Winn’s forum view
off base on columnist Mr. Winn, “if
not the oldest in attendance, had the whitest, the hoarist of heads” [sic] may in fact be the
most accurate of your statements.
As
you would know proof is a function of evidence, the better the evidence the
better the proof.
Before
attempting to debate any subject you should make certain you have an in depth
understanding of what it involves?
For
your edification I simply beat councilmember Abarbanel to a pulp leaving it up
to columnist
Because
I was not as familiar with the facts as Mr. Winn I had in fact decided to keep
my big mouth shut but when I heard councilmember Abarbanel comment on the title
deed on the property in question containing “embarrassing” material the councilmember
using either the word “drunks” or “alcoholics” who would
be prevented from purchasing such a property the hair on my back started to
rise and before I knew it I was once again wearing my “Risk Assessment” hat wondering why Mr. Abarbanel would
bring up such irrelevant facts, if not to distract the audience for his real
agenda.
In
my RA services which involve being
brought in at times by the most successful and might I add the most rapacious SCALs [Shareholder
Class
Action
Litigators]
who specialize in white collar crime specifically Wall Street crime where the
biggest crooks build in to their “cost of sales” the “cost
of getting caught” requiring the most “skilled and experienced”
litigators “to-get-her” [sic] with my
help to
respond to fast balls thrown at or near head, one of the things we look
for in addition to what is said and not said are the distractions, the smoke screens
such as “The title deed has very specific provisions preventing so and sos,
blah blah” [sic].
So
naturally I saw the most terrific opening to question councilmember Abarbanel
to determine whether in fact he was now wanting to add “clown” to his Curriculum
Vitae or suffering from some form of dementia since pretty much anyone with a
morsel of a neuron firing in the space between their ears would know that so
long as someone has the money in this “dog eat god aspartame” [sic] world
whether they are a crook let alone a drunk would have no bearing on them
becoming the proud owners of such a sought after piece of property or was
Councilmember simply attempting to play a game of chess with the audience made
up of mostly old folks.
Since
I am also rather well schooled in the business of corporate restructurings-work
outs I wanted to know WHAT ELSE Councilmember found “EMBARRASSING” and
to help him out as he attempted to avoid answering what I considered to be a
fair question since he was the one who raised the point of “alcoholism” being
just one of the things he found again “EMBARRASING” when reviewing the title
deeds of this property in question, whether there was a provision preventing
either a Jewish
Or
Black
person from becoming the proud owner of such a property.
Why
not flush out everything given how apparent it was that this was one big
orchestrated circus to give the public a sense there was “open debate” in the
Peoples Republic of Del Mar.
Bear
in mind not only was I born and raised in the communist state of South Africa NOT under the “command and control” of the Apartheid
Afrikaner Government but us “Sly English” as in the DAAC [DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel] I have also owned property in the Peoples Republic of Santa
Monica, such matters I have been pointing out for some time bothering a number
of folks all over the world who like the majority of our councilmembers prefer
not to be questioned.
The
fact that the Editor of the Del Mar Times would choose to EXLCUDE my name in an article written by one of its
columnists that paints me in a favorable light on this same subject matter and
then allows someone such as yourself who writes in has a number of facts wrong
including me being “a frequent attendee at meetings on city matters” to INCLUDE my name in a letter that
trashes my very good name is telling of the bias of the Del Mar Times Editor as
well as its Publisher and owners unless of course columnist and failed
politician
For
the record, as best I recall, I have attended 2 city council meetings and this
one charade town hall meeting in the 15 odd years I have been a resident of
I
have suggested to the Editor of the Del Mar Times that he, the publisher as
well as the new owners of the Del Mar Times in an effort to mitigate their
damages to my very good name publish both this letter as well as the very
timely piece I presented to the editor this past Wednesday titled “Flirting
with Danger” which deals with personal paths leading to the ocean from
cliffs of Del Mar, a significant risk that in my judgment the City of Del Mar
including Councilmember Drucker who daily passing by CHOOses to ignore, such actions will I am quite certain go a
long way towards refuting the Del Mar
Times IS for Free Speech as long as it is NOT mine.
Back
of one page flyer:
[word
count 1142]