From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:39 PM
To: Marie Dion [Gevisser
Cc: Tony Passante Esq.
Subject: RE: Warren v. Stewart

Marie –Tony’s communications speak clearly.

After accessing your email account I ran into the lawyer who first referred Gary Matlin Esq. Tony’s associate.

This lawyer whose name escapes me right now seemed at a loss for words altho he only had my word on the very clear written record, “Time is of the essence”, the attorney-client privilege YOUR privilege NOT the lawyer’s privilege, something this lawyer agreed not every single human being on this planet is made aware of by their lawyer, more so than ever be4 thanks to u and me the masses including the Lumpen Proletarians getting increasingly up to speed on how the “real world” works in this “dog eat god” [sic] world.

You may in fact need to retain 2 attorneys, following the advice of Tony who have been the one to suggest going to the yellow pages and having say Pypeetoe sniff, then again I believe Tony is your “attorney of record”, meaning I am not quite certain how easy it would be for him if he were to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help each of us G-D, to leave u high and dry after failing to follow thru on your explicit instructions, now for the first time hearing his reasoning which even if it were sound seems a rather lame excuse, again, “Time is of the essence”.

Moreover, I am not quite sure exactly how much of a retainer u paid, I recall u picking up an error in the amount that resulted in Tony not all that hurriedly getting what was agreed to “substituted in.”

Now u know I am not an attorney but pride myself in providing my very “best efforts” which I think u may have heard me say has been interpreted, at least according to Bill Squadron Esq. by courts here in the United States as nothing short of bankrupting the idiot,,, willing to place such wording in a binding contract which is what I have done with u, u have my word that if I fail u I will not, I repeat, I will not beg for mercy.

U have not met Bill Squadron the President of SporTVision a spin-off of the Fox Network owned by Rupert Murdoch who has this funny Australian accent, not to make fun of either Rupert, whose attorney of some 30+ years was Bill’s father, or Bill since he made a point after we had one great time together during World Cup 1998, at which time u shopped until you dropped, no strike that, walked about the streets of Paris attracting shoppers as u do wherever u go, of giving me this 1997 Stanley Cup electronic hockey puck that his group developed to track the ice hockey on TV.

Networking the name of the game.

Your move.

Gary

[word count 472]

-----Original Message-----
From: marie [mailto:mdg42203@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:48 PM
To: gsg@sellnext.com
Subject: FW: Warren v. Stewart

-----Original Message-----

From: Anthony Passante [mailto:ajp@martin-passante.com]

Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:31 PM

To: marie

Subject: RE: Warren v. Stewart

Gary,

     The trial is scheduled for the 29th now because

of Ms. Goetz' surgery.

Tony Passante

--- marie <mdg42203@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Tue 11/16/2004 3:18 PM

Tony,

I have permission from Marie to access her email

account.

What time is the trial on the 18th?

Gary

 -----Original Message-----

From: Anthony Passante

[mailto:ajp@martin-passante.com]

Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:27 PM

To: marie

Subject: RE: Warren v. Stewart

Marie,

     My email of November 12, 2004 advised you that

your settlement demand had been made.  I did not

forward your email of November 4, 2004 but rather sent

a brief letter to opposing counsel advising them of

your demand.  That is what prompted their offer to

allow you to stay in the house until January 1, 2005.

     I would not send the contents of your email for

various reasons.  It is a confidential attorney-client communication and its contents do not further your case.  My impression is that the Warrens and their attorneys are not afraid of you and that they have confidence in their case.  There is nothing in your email that will change that.

     Since you are continuing to refuse to meet with

me to prepare for trial, I do not wish to represent

your interests further.  I will be sending via mail

the paperwork necessary to replace me.

Tony Passante

 --- marie <mdg42203@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

From: Marie Dion [Gevisser]

Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:07 AM

To: Tony Passante Esq.

Cc: Gary S. Gevisser

Subject: RE: Warren v. Stewart

Tony,

To repeat myself I think we have covered the case already.

If you have read what Gary Gevisser developed which I am 100% familiar with it should reassure you of our winning position. This is why my demand for a quick settlement makes perfect sense. What exactly are you missing?

Again, if you have any questions email me. I am more comfortable in light of what has transpired communicating via email. At this point I need my communications with you all documented and I am still waiting to hear confirmation of my Settlement Demand with the Warrens-Goetz-Stubbs-law firm of Kimball et al, i.e. - verbal communications get lost.

I thought lawyers prided themselves on legalize, the written word being King. Even I can see the benefits of this.

Marie

-----Original Message-----

From: Anthony Passante Esq.

Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 5:12 PM

To: Marie Dion Stewart

Subject: Warren v. Stewart

Marie,

     Before this attorney-client relationship

deteriorates further, I would appreciate you meeting

with me to discuss the case and your testimony. 

     I believe I communicate more effectively in

person than by email or telephone.  Accordingly,

please call my office to schedule a meeting at a time convenient for you on Thursday, November 18.

     Thank you.

Tony Passante