From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 4:56 PM
To: novacuringlight@aol.com
Cc: rest;
JRK@class-action-law.com; Paul van Eeden; kfinewsdirector@kfi640.com;
Lieutenant Milakovitch; larryneilson@nationalmarketing.com
Subject: RE: dog sitter...RAFT....CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Just
got back from a walk in the Cleveland National Forest “picking up” on the “feedback” coming from my last
broadcasted communique to this Mary woman over at the Trilateral Commission and what I thought I heard this one person calling me on
my cell phone was, “Don’t worry about watching your back since anyone who is
anyone is running for cover watch out instead for being set up with diamond
parcels being sent to you in the mail” [sic] courtesy you think of “rough
edged” EJE who you think got paid
how by the DAAC for his one of a
kind PR job?
I
thought you would get a kick out of the following graphic sent to me earlier by
Dr. John K. Pollard:
Re: Here's a little message for those who ask to be off your
list.
An
excellent question this “how long?”
Don’t
know but maybe you know how long be4 members of the TC that include former chairman of the Federal Reserve, Paul
Volker, realize that it is just a question of time be4 the average, hardworking
business person who couldn’t give a rat’s ass
about shares in public corporations, just dreaming of a simple spread in RSF, a couple of horses, nothing more a
5,000 square foot separate quarters for each of his 5 mistresses and the list
of entitlements go on of course ad infinitum, follow the logical thought
processing that if there is the slightest truth to what I am saying about the DAAC having an unlimited supply of
untraceable, lightweight and never inventoried diamond currency wouldn’t the DAAC be able to find just one employed
Or
Unemployed
“audirtor”, forget a genius
financial engineer to “kick star” their own insurance company, comply with all the
regulations, you know of course the United States Federal Government does not
regulate this “house of cards” industry which I just threw in to serve as just
a little distraction not to take away from the point of you thinking a little
more of delaying your next insurance premium payment?
[Word
count 342]
From: novacuringlight@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:26 PM
To: gevisser@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: dog sitter...RAFT
I wanted
to reply quickly and will elaborate more when in the office tomorrow.
Ross
I will
read more carefully all that you have sent since Friday, I was traveling and
first time online since then, I may have an alternative. IS this to be
two times a week for how long? I still have friends with larger
properties in Rancho that have not lost their spreads to the pack of attornies
that assended on me in 2001 and left little but scraps.
Will talk
to you tomorrow.
ALAN
A.CREAMER
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary S.
Gevisser
To: Novacuringlight@aol.com
Sent: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:15:08 -0800
Subject: RE: dog sitter...RAFT
I
have been trying to find someone closer to
I
cannot control a 2 year old walking up to a 10 year old dog who while a member
of our very peaceful family cannot be depended to be always friendly. We know
from personal experience that to grab our Maggie by the back of her neck or her
rump is dangerous for anyone including a fool i.e. someone not in touch would
do such a foolish thing. The fact is we had a member of our family who is in
her 50s do exactly that. And our Maggie snapped at her and in the process broke
the skin on this poorly conditioned relative's finger. This one incident is one
that we share repeatedly with not only our kids but everyone who is taken by
Maggie's beautiful face and shiny chocolate fur. She is not, however, a wolf in sheep's clothing and the one
concern I have is that on these days when she would be with you we would not in
all likehood be able to take her to the beach.
Perhaps
this common "god" sic would have us not only meet but spend
meaningful time together and what exactly does that mean?
First
and last it means I would no long expect free samples of your toothpaste and as
part of the exchange I insist upon paying the going rate for those who would
dogsit our Maggie caring for her as we would hope we would be cared for should
we be fortunate to be a Maggie on the next go around.
This
could have been shorter but no sweater - my wife Marie when telling her earlier
what I planned to compose said I must have been drunk having possibly more than
my fair share of sake.
I
will call your house in a short while.
From:
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 2:52 PM
To: gevisser@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: dog sitter...RAFT
In
a message dated 12/3/2005 2:33:35 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
gevisser@sbcglobal.net writes:
We
are in
When
is this needed?
I
hope and assume a two year male human child will not be too much for the lab?