From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 6:16 AM PT
To: 'Neil Gould'
Cc: rest;
Dr. Laura Family
Subject: SEX...NOW.... Let me ...
I don’t know anyone who can
in fact cut to the chase quicker than given how well I know my subject matter
of “money creation”.
My idea is to first get in a
“room” the children of each and every “mover and shaker” in the world and to
ask them very simply questions such as
If I want to improve my
credit score rating and at the same time have access to unlimited, untraceable,
lightweight and never inventoried Diamond Currency how would I accomplish this
apart from first asking the DAAC who I think you would agree may not be
inclined to answer this question even if subpoenaed before their United States
Congress and when called to testify in open hearings before the United States
Congress I would most likely be dead were it not for all the good-smart work you
have done with things like your FOOLS
NAMES, FOOLS FACES IN PUBLIC PLACES list, “deafening silences” to
boot?
This question would possibly
lose about 99.999% of all the children present and 100% of those not attending
which you would agree is therefore a positive.
Another example is to ask
the children if they heard of President John F. Kennedy as well as his brother
RFK and before they have a chance to answer mention that RFK was both a Senator
and Attorney General of the
About 100% of those in the
“room” would give some indication that they were somewhat familiar with both
the names and the facts which you would agree is positive and remember we are
not bothering about the rest of the children who are not invited.
Then we inform them that RFK
and JFK were staunch Democrats concerned with stuff like free speech, civil
rights etc but they had this very close family friend who was a Republican
which is the other major party here in the States that is in fact identical in
every respect to the Democrat party with both party members talking out of both
sides of their mouth at once.
Then we can jump right into
the next point given the pregnant pause that came from them hearing something
they weren’t quite expecting to let them know the name of the Republican Joseph
McCarthy which would mean something to about o.oooo1% of those in the “room”
but remember the children are still thinking about both RFK and JFK having sex
at the same time with Jackie O who was also having sex at the same time with
Aristotle Onassis that gives us a little more time to inform the children who
just love the sex talk because they are told by their parents that nudity is
fine at home but don’t bring you sex partners in to the living room when the TV
is on that again gives us time to mention that Joseph McCarthy whole thing was
to “reel in” Hollywood as he went on a witch-hunt looking for “communists” in
Hollywood while of course giving RFK a job which RFK wanted like a “hole in the
head” because it would upset all RFK and JFK’s Hollywood friends which you then
remind the children doesn’t seem to bother any of RFK and JFK’s current friends
in Hollywood who don’t even really care that JFK had the convenient excuse of
being in hospital for a back ailment when the senate of the united States voted
to censure his close families friend for this nonsense witch-hunt which was
simply a “smokescreen” to test whether both JFK and RFK were presidential
material.
Not to mention that RFK very
quietly attended the funeral of DAAC operative Joseph McCarthy and JFK when he
finally returned to the Senate after having sex with Marilyne Monroe who like
all of JFK and RFK’s prostitutes were on the payroll of the DAAC including
Jackie never said how he would have voted either for or against censuring this
very DAAC beast of a man Joseph McCarthy who the DAAC made the godfather of
RFK’s daughter, Kathleen Kennedy..
By this time you have about
0.00001% of the children in the entire world completely lost and confused but
what about their parents who have to be thinking that a joker like you could
really make this stuff so entertaining that they wont
let any of their kids show up in the future.
While I now sleep on it you
provide me with the economics.
From: Neil Gould [mailto:ngould@hkstar.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:27 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Let me now when you are next online.
Problem is the mails are so
long ( no doubt about the genius in it )that if you look at Human real time,
quality time and life time, it leaves a quota in peoples mind of what to read
and what not to read. That is why the short sharp bullet is the best method of
delivery.
It is the writer who reads
all the mails and it is the writer who can remember it all.
tell me more on yr HK idea
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
To: 'Neil Gould'
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Let me now when you are next online.
Did you read what
I sent to Sargent Jensen?
Did you read what
I sent to John K. Pollard a few hours later?
From: Neil Gould [mailto:ngould@hkstar.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 7:34 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Let me now when you are next online.
on line now
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
To: Neil Gould
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:03 AM
Subject: Let me now when you are next online.