From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 6:16 AM
To: Neil Gould
Cc: rest;
Subject: SEX...NOW.... Let me
...
I don’t
know anyone who can in fact cut to the chase quicker than me given how well I know my subject matter of “money
creation”.
My idea is
to first get in a “room” the children of each and every “mover and shaker” in the world and
to ask them very simply questions such as
If I want to
improve my credit score rating and at the same time have access to unlimited,
untraceable, lightweight and never inventoried Diamond Currency how would I
accomplish this apart from first asking the DAAC who I think you would agree
may not be inclined to answer this question even if subpoenaed before their
United States Congress and when called to testify in open hearings before the
United States Congress I would most likely be dead were it not for all the
good-smart work you have done with things like your FOOLS
NAMES, FOOLS FACES IN PUBLIC PLACES list, “deafening silences” to boot?
This
question would possibly lose about 99.999% of all the children present and 100%
of those not attending which you would agree is therefore a positive.
Another
example is to ask the children if they heard of President John F.
Kennedy as well as his brother RFK and
before they have a chance to answer mention that RFK was both a Senator and Attorney
General of the
About 100%
of those in the “room” would give some indication that they were somewhat
familiar with both the names and the facts which you would agree is positive
and remember we are not bothering about the rest of the children who are not
invited.
Then we
inform them that RFK and JFK were staunch Democrats concerned
with stuff like free speech, civil rights etc but they had this very close
family friend who was a Republican which is the other major party here in the
States that is in fact identical in every respect to the Democrat party with
both party members talking out of both sides of their mouth at once.
Then we can
jump right into the next point given the pregnant pause that came from them
hearing something they weren’t quite expecting to let them know the name of the
Republican Joseph McCarthy which
would mean something to about o.oooo1% of those in the “room” but remember the
children are still thinking about both RFK and JFK having sex at the same time with Jackie O
who was also having sex at the same time with Aristotle Onassis that gives us a
little more time to inform the children who just love the sex talk because they
are told by their parents that nudity is fine at home but don’t bring you sex
partners in to the living room when the TV is on that again gives us time to
mention that Joseph McCarthy’s whole
thing was to “reel in” Hollywood as he went on a witch-hunt looking for “communists”
in Hollywood while of course giving RFK a job which RFK wanted like a “hole
in the head” because it would upset all RFK and JFK’s Hollywood friends which you
then remind the children doesn’t seem to bother any of RFK and JFK’s current friends in Hollywood
who don’t even really care that JFK had the convenient excuse of being in hospital
for a back ailment when the Senate of the United States voted to censure his
close family’s friend for this nonsense
witch-hunt which was simply a “smokescreen” to test whether both JFK and RFK were
presidential material.
Not to
mention that RFK
very quietly attended the funeral of DAAC
operative Joseph McCarthy and JFK when he finally returned to the Senate after
having sex with Marilyne Monroe who like all of JFK and RFK’s prostitutes were on the
payroll of the DAAC including Jackie
never said how he would have voted either for or against censuring this very DAAC beast of a man Joseph McCarthy who
the DAAC made the godfather of RFK’s
daughter, Kathleen Kennedy.
By this
time you have about 0.00001% of the children in the entire world completely
lost and confused but what about their parents who have to be thinking that a
joker like you could really make this stuff so entertaining that they won’t let
any of their kids show up in the future.
While I now
sleep on it you provide me with the economics.
[Word count 751]
From:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:27 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Let me now when you are next online.
Problem is the mails are so
long ( no doubt about the genius in it )that if you look at Human real time,
quality time and life time, it leaves a quota in peoples mind of what to read
and what not to read. That is why the short sharp bullet is the best method of
delivery.
It is the writer who reads
all the mails and it is the writer who can remember it all.
tell me more on yr HK idea
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
To: '
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Let me now when you are next online.
Did you read what
I sent to Sargent Jensen?
Did you read what
I sent to John K. Pollard a few hours later?
From:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 7:34 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Let me now when you are next online.
on line now
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
To:
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:03 AM
Subject: Let me now when you are next online.
__________ NOD32 2300 (20070531) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
__________ NOD32 2303 (20070601) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
