From:
Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:14 PM PT
To: mvassallo
Subject: I, along with my wife, Marie, met you cruising down the
Yangtze.
Here is a photo of Marie shortly after the wind helped
expose more of her.
I am about to begin work on the first draft of my forthcoming book but
in the meantime I am continuing to expose more of the rot
all geared to not only help promote the book, a collection of meaningful
thoughts, but to get hard working and entrepreneurial folks such as
yourself to realize that your businesses can no longer be dependant upon a strong
United States dollar-Euro and the such, such worthless currencies all propped
up by an increasingly weak western military which is not to suggest that the
increasing military mite of the east is a better substitute UNLESS it is backed up by a world
beating economy which of course is why China has already won World War III
without having to fire a shot.
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 6:36 PM
To: mvassallo
Subject: FW: Have you received the things??
Mark
please give me your thoughts on what I wrote below.
Hope
all is well.
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 6:27 PM
To: ? ?
Subject: RE: Have you received the things??
Dear Stacy,
We have not
heard anything.
In the next few days I may in fact begin the first
draft on my next book, THE HISTORY OF MONEY CREATION AND ITS FUTURE.
I would like your opinion on the following:
Many, if not most, in the west view the Chinese as
lacking creativity and look to the west
for "innovation" which I think is very minor given how so very
little innovation is coming out of the west these days especially when compared
to the great industrial advances that occurred toward the end of the 19th
century and beginning of the 20 century. Do you agree or disagree with me and
then explain to me why you agree or disagree.
The 3 most important scientific theories of the
past century, Special-General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and Chaos Theory
have today been spread throughout the world with each country now focused on
"bettering" the lives of their respective peoples.
Do you have an opinion on what I just wrote above?
Money is the pursuit of everyone but in
Do you agree with what I wrote above and either way
please explain what you think.
The Chinese people are relatively more "subservient"
as a result of continuous invasions and being ruled by emperors including the
Allies who in the mid 19th century hooked the masses of Chinese on opium in
return for China's tea, a not exactly fair trade, and then some 60 years later
in 1900 decided it was time to invade and steal all the physical riches that
remained.
Do you agree with what I wrote above and either way
please explain what you think.
Believing that the Chinese were mindless,
so addicted to opium and therefore fixated on their next "fix"
the western alliance then saw themselves as so gracious in victory to
"allow" China to be rid of its increasingly western world
weakened emperors to be replaced by " Money Power " that while
created out of thin air had the backing of the Monroe Doctrine also
known as gunboat diplomacy.
Do you agree with what I wrote above and either way
please explain what you think.
So very important the formation of the Federal
Reserve in 1913 just 2 years after the collapse of the Qing and final Chinese
dynasty but being "hooked" on a drug that someone
else prescribes is not quite as damaging as becoming dependant on one's
fictitious money to rule over one's slaves with an "iron fist".
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
Rust like body fat inevitably takes it toll. Do you
agree?
The Chinese people have got relatively speaking
significantly stronger and benefited from "necessity being the mother of
invention" bearing in mind the Chinese invented paper money and gunpowder and then
"sum" [sic] while the west has become nothing short of a paper
tiger to mention little of the expression, The kettle calling the pot black.
You may not know that "sic" is the Latin Adverb meaning
"so" that is used to denote either a spelling or grammar
error in the words/expression in quotes.
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
Like most Chinese I have come to know rather well
in the 49 odd years I have been around, at least this go-around, it is highly likely you know very little if anything
about THE DIAMOND INVENTION or for
that matter DIAMOND CURRENCY that is the exclusive money of a mafia
organization known as the DeBeers-Anglo American Cartel, the
cartel of cartels who have been now for more than 100 years in command
and control of the entire western worlds monetary system.
The proof that this is in fact the case can be
found in the truth that it is the western world who is more hooked on the
nonsense of the DAACs DIAMOND
CURRENCY which is unlimited in supply, untraceable, lightweight and
never inventoried can be found in how significant a role insurance plays in the
daily lives of westerners.
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
Insurance is a business that started out on very solid footing when a bunch of competing
shippers decided to pool their risks but today it is
not only totally corrupt but very much under the command and control of
the DAAC, the mafia of mafia.
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
The richest people in the world have their hands
buried deep in the insurance markets that are all geared toward reallocating
the worlds limited precious resources that havent already been stolen by
those issuing DIAMOND CURRENCY.
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
Those benefiting from such daylight robbery have
used their gift of the gab to confuse not only those doing the hard work
but those masses of westerners who are today hooked on what has become a welfare
state that makes the worst of what we have seen in the west just the
tip of the iceberg in terms of what is about to take place.
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
It is the western world who after thinking that
they had their slave laborers fooled into working for them for not much more
than the "sniff of an oil rag" began to educate their offspring in
to believing that "anything is possible" without
spelling out the utter nonsense of money being the "best gauge of productivity".
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
The Chinese people while so very non-aggressive
have in fact continued, but ever so quietly to "question" things
like Europeans "work to live" while Americans "live
to work" and Chinese "live to learn".
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
Chinese people remain very much aware of their long
history with a culture that spans thousands of years. Chinese people "treasure" their elders who have
passed down the "truth",
such elders not looked down upon because they simply didnt have a bigger gun
than those lacking culture but who possessed more advanced weaponry. Chinese
people are consequently more deeply rooted in the ideal of "pursuit
of truth" while being ever so practical. A good example is China
embracing the technology of the west coming from a variety of sources including
Japan who have yet to apologize for their past atrocities going back all the
way to the Treaty of Versailles following the "interlude" of
fighting.
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
During World War I, the Chinese Government, such as
it was, sided with the Allies. In return, they were promised that the German
concessions in Shangdong province would be handed back over to the Chinese
Government at the end of the war. They weren't, and to add insult to injury,
the Treaty of Versailles handed them over to
Do you understand anything about what I wrote above
and even if not please explain what you think.
Stacy, I have "thrown a lot" at you
and of course I realize that your English is not as good as your Chinese.
I am just wanting you to use what I have written
above as a "guideline" for you to tell me how you "see
things", how you "see your strengths and weaknesses" and what
prospects and hurdles lie ahead.
Remember that everything is "relative"
and while those in the west might think you have all been "asleep" you have been most of all
extraordinarily patient and so very slow to "point fingers" at
your aggressors in the west who in my opinion have now woken up a little too
late to the fact that China has won World War III, the war to end all wars,
without so much as firing a shot.
There is a friend of mine who lives in Hong Kong
who has been "dialoguing" with me for quite some time, Neil Gould,
however, while saying he is quite certain of China's "economic prowess"
thinks he can get away with suggesting that the Chinese are more crooked than
folks in the west well illustrated in his recent statements about all his
disastrous experiences with Chinese lawyers and yet he feels comfortable in
letting me know that he is entrusting a Hong Kong lawyer who is very possibly
non-Chinese to negotiate with his mainland Chinese adversaries relying on what
is nothing more than the most "smoke and mirrors" negotiating
position that is typical of what you see on Wall Street, the most rigged of the
capital and financial markets.
And remember most
Looking forward to hearing from you.
[Word count 1541]
From: ? ?
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:36 AM
To: Gary Gevisser
Subject: Have you received the things??
Dear Gary,
Because typhoon ,we are not
sure if they send the things to you or not! So I send this e-mail to you !!!
stacy
