From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 1:47 PM PT
To: Karen Richardson – Wall Street Journal
Subject: RE: Let me know when you are next online.

 

GOOD FOR YOU.

 

Out of nearly 1,000 individuals-groups who received the exact same email as you “Let me know when you are next online”, on average about an hour ago, you are only the 3RD person to respond for reasons that are VERY OBVIOUS if you are not only following along BUT STILL SEE THE BENEFIT OF “sitting on the fence”.

 

I want you to now read the following “draft” email I am planning on sending a colleague of yours but from a “competitive” newspaper, The New York Times.

 

I would very much appreciate your critique and don’t, I repeat don’t tell me anything along the lines of you being “dumb” or that you would prefer to be “deafeningly silent” given how you have already shown great courage.

 

No doubt you are following along perfectly fine SIGNIFICANTLY better than more than 99% of the people on my email list who constitute “on average” in the top 1/10th of 1% of the richest people on the planet who prior to me “opening my big mouth” would have paid handsomely just for the opportunity to tell their jealous friends, colleagues and most of all their family that they had just “broken bread with me” even though they would have got nothing out of me which was something others wouldn’t have known for “certain” to mention little of Steven Spielberg’s movie Munich which I will cover more of in the rest of the email to Ms. Craswell of the NYX,  the most “frightening” aspect is that IN ALL PROBABILITY were it not for me about to provide my critique of this very important movie, most if not all people other than highly skilled Israeli commandos would simply come away saying words to the effect, “Its just a movie. Everybody knows that the very best of Israel’s most elite commandos chosen out of their most secretive special forces units don’t suffer from mental breakdowns” which while perfectly true as it relates to the past especially when hunting down very specifically the “Black September” leadership responsible for masterminding the Munich massacre of 11 Israeli athletes which took place during the period of September 1972 all through to the early 1980s  is GROSSLY MISLEADING given the INEXPLICABLE “hits” Israel’s specials forces have taken in very recent times as more of Israel’s best of the very best as well as their “targets” UNDERSTAND MUCH BETTER the insidious “money creation” business that keeps warring parties from ever sitting down quietly amongst themselves AS IS SO WELL DISPLAYED in one particular scene and instead of these warring factions talking about bs issues such as “everyone is entitled to their onion…different set of moral values and the such…going back generations…” someone such as me were to suggest to my “opponent” also wandering about his groups, “INEXPLICABLE HITS” says the following:

 

BEFORE OPENING YOUR BIG FUCKEN MOUTH read the most fascinating book ever written by a blockbuster HOLLYWOOD author that explains not only why controversy is all “engineered” but equally important the insidious “money creation” business that is EXCLUSIVELY responsible for the best business people in the world, the Israelis and the Palestinians being at each other’s throats.

 

Moreover, when you take a deep breath and relax as I now inform you of who would pay handsomely for both our services in gold bullion without any head trips, think why it is that big time Hollywood Producer-Director Steven Spielberg who you remember did that “tearjerker” Schindler’s List as well as ET and the such has so FUCKEN much to say but yet he nor anyone else in Hollywood has “seen fit” to take on the DAAC, the terrorist of terrorist financing organization by simply producing one epic blockbuster movie called if not THE DIAMOND INVENTION then how about THE DAAC TREASON COMPLAINT against the United States Congress et al?.

 

 

DRAFT

 

Ms. Creswell,

 

The timing of the indictment against Melvyn Weiss Esq. of the 2,000 pound gorilla law firm of Milberg Weiss-Lerach couldn’t have been more “picture perfect” if of course the purpose was to distract from the much more important issue of the day which I believe I spelled out rather well in this communiqué followed up shortly thereafter with this one to a part owner in a in local coin shop operation whose main principal has yet to respond.

 

I now burden you with the responsibility of informing the world, knowing perfectly well how I have already used such deafening silence to spread the word more than just amongst their competitors of a much greater threat than the evil of Mr. Weiss and you and the such who give the innocent and naïve investors nothing more than a false sense of security.

 

Let me begin this not all that informal class action complaint NOT against criminal Melvyn Weiss Esq and his unindicted co-conspirator William Lerach Esq but against you, the New York Times as well as each and every prosecutor who has done the right thing and the smart thing which is also the right thing in prosecuting this MOST IMPORTANT case that I daresay is more important than the Digital Equipment Corporation class action lawsuit that gained me both national and international attention when famous Federal Court Judge Jack B. Weinstein credited me, the Chief Executive Officer of a medical device company headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada in coming forward with irrefutable “smoking gun proof” of malfeasance by crooked plaintiff lawyers like Milberg Weiss-Lerach and their clients resulting in the Judge Weinstein overturning a landmark multi-million dollar repetitive stress injury jury award.

 

First refresh yourself with the following two paragraphs from your latest gobbledygook all designed once again to distract the already pretty much all “brainne dead” [sic] AMERICAN public BUT NOT the NET EXPORTERS of oil now hoarding PHYSICAL GOLD like never before in anticipation of the MASSIVE DEVALUATION of the totally worthless United States Dollar:

 

To disguise some of the secret payments to plaintiffs, which prosecutors referred to as kickbacks, the law firm moved cash through casinos and kept money in a credenza in Mr. Bershad's office, the indictment said.

 

"This case is about protecting the integrity of the justice system in America," said Debra Wong Yang, the United States attorney in Los Angeles. The firm and lawyers for Mr. Bershad, 66, and Mr. Schulman, 54, said they would fight the charges.

 

This is not to suggest you throw water on top of the gasoline that you have been inhaling as you contemplate physical suicide following your financial suicide, instead read what I began sending last evening to Josie Venturillo who along with others is helping me track down Rubin “Hurricane” Carter and yes it is also worthwhile to reacquaint yourself with my stellar track record in ferreting out “bullsh*t: [sic[ by clicking on the previous “track” hyperlink to mention little of gold last trading at $663.80 and if it does drop to $36 versus the United States dollar being made “a whole lot cheaper and softer than toilet paper” should not so much us in the U.S. “living the good life” but the dirt poor net exporters of oil lose all confidence in our over the top corrupt elected and unelected government officials and smart people like Devin Standard, the executor of my estate, decide to focus their energies on helping our not exactly idiot and increasingly less fearful despots make the most use of being so awash in our totally worthless United States Dollars.

 

The opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange has been long been rung…

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Anonymous
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:29 AM
To: gsg@sellnext.com
Subject: M W Indictment

 

U.S. Indictment for Big Law Firm in Class Actions

               E-MailPrint Single Page Reprints Save

 

By JULIE CRESWELL

Published: May 19, 2006

The nation's leading class-action securities law firm, Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, and two of its partners were charged yesterday with making more than $11 million in secret payments to three individuals who served as plaintiffs in more than 150 lawsuits.

 

Skip to next paragraph

Enlarge this Image

 

Jill Connelly for The New York Times

Debra Wong Yang, center, the U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, discussed the indictment Thursday.

The indictment is the first instance of a law firm with national reach facing criminal charges, and it could prove to be a fatal blow for the firm. The lawsuits cited in the indictment spanned two decades, occurring as recently as 2005, and generated some $216 million in legal fees for the firm.

 

Its lucrative business made Milberg Weiss a target for political critics who saw the firm as a symbol of a national litigation industry that had gone out of control. These critics said that many of the firm's lawsuits against corporations were frivolous, raising the cost of doing business.

 

The critics contended that investors, for the most part, saw only pennies on the dollar from any recoveries won by the firm. In the 1990's, Congress raised the legal hurdle for such lawsuits in large part in response to Milberg Weiss. Even so, the firm continued to thrive.

 

"There's never been a firm of their prominence that has been indicted," said Ralph C. Ferrara, a former general counsel with the Securities and Exchange Commission who is now a lawyer with the law firm of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae. "This is a regrettable and remarkable thing."

 

In the 20-count indictment by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles yesterday, Milberg Weiss and two of its prominent partners, David J. Bershad and Steven G. Schulman, are accused of racketeering conspiracy, mail fraud, money laundering conspiracy and obstruction of justice.

 

The prosecutors are asking for the return of the fees earned by the firm and those named in the indictment. In addition, there is the possibility of prison for the two partners — up to 20 years for racketeering conspiracy, for example.

 

To disguise some of the secret payments to plaintiffs, which prosecutors referred to as kickbacks, the law firm moved cash through casinos and kept money in a credenza in Mr. Bershad's office, the indictment said.

 

"This case is about protecting the integrity of the justice system in America," said Debra Wong Yang, the United States attorney in Los Angeles. The firm and lawyers for Mr. Bershad, 66, and Mr. Schulman, 54, said they would fight the charges.

 

Feared and loathed inside boardrooms across the country, Milberg Weiss made hay out of the numerous accounting and management scandals that caused stocks to collapse in recent years. Sometimes bullying, sometimes screaming, sometimes speaking very softly, the firm's lawyers coaxed and cajoled what it has estimated to be $45 billion in recoveries from companies.

 

"The people who are going to be happy about this indictment are the hundreds and hundreds of companies that Milberg Weiss successfully sued and the political demagogues who rail about 'trial lawyers' running up the price of eggs," said William W. Taylor, a lawyer at Zuckerman Spaeder who represents Milberg Weiss.

 

"You could hear the cheering all the way from Wall Street to Pennsylvania Avenue, and it feeds right into the hands of people who want to prevent victims from being able to get the justice from big companies that they deserve," Mr. Taylor said.

 

Legal experts said the criminal case could sharply change the landscape of securities class-action litigation as one of its dominant participants struggles to survive. While Milberg Weiss lawyers can still legally represent clients, the indictment is likely to set off a race among competitors to unseat the firm from several high-profile lawsuits.

 

The indictment could also open the door to the prospect of settlements made decades ago being reopened or of lawsuits against the firm itself by shareholders contending they did not receive enough in a settlement or by a law firm that was jostled out of representing a lead plaintiff.

 

"Could there be a class-action lawsuit against Milberg over this? It can happen," said George M. Cohen, a law professor with the University of Virginia. Mr. Cohen and others, however, noted that given the firm's partnership structure, the personal assets of the partners would most likely be protected and the firm itself probably does not have much cash.

 

Shortly after the indictment was announced, the firm denied wrongdoing in a posting on a Web site it started, www.milbergweissjustice.com.

 

 

 


From: Richardson, Karen [mailto:Karen.Richardson@wsj.com]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 1:03 PM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: RE: Let me know when you are next online.

 

I'm online.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 3:36 PM
To: Richardson, Karen
Subject: Let me know when you are next online.