From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To: Kristen Connor Esq. lawyer
for Greedy Beckham c/o Ted Kimball of Kimball…-
Cc: rest;
Walter E. Pinkerton, Jr. Esq.; Eliot Spitzer - Attorney General of New York
State;
Subject: FW:
Transcript..Spin...---...
The
purpose of this communiqué is to make as certain as is humanly possible that
you do the right thing and the smart thing which is also the right thing and
find a way along with my former lawyer Walter Pinkerton to get this communiqué
into Judge Bloom’s hands.
Judge
Bloom is expected to rule today, perhaps this coming Monday, on what appears at
“first blush” to be a “nothing” case but it is my hope given the time he and
the courts have “invested” already in this matter it would make all the sense
in the world to take the additional time to read my thoughts on these so
important matters that got so lost in the “nonsense talk”.
There
is “good reason” for me to believe that it is not only Judge Bloom but everyone
in this world wanting to make a “positive difference” who will benefit from
this communiqué especially those willing to come to terms with why it is that
us human beings tend to focus on “natural disasters”, stuff that we cannot
control versus taking stock of the things we can do “sumthing” [sic] about such
as discussing quietly and logically without anyone raising their voices, no one
imploring G-d to intervene , no one thinking for a moment about resorting to
violence, the very important issues of the day, dealing not only with how to
preserve but more importantly to restore “balance” beginning with the
environment so extraordinarily “out of whack” while at the same time
maintaining not only “full employment” but ensuring each and every one of us
including those clogging up our jails make not only an honest living but can
look forward to preserving their wealth whether it be in the form of money,
just ONE means of exchange,
Or
Knowledge-
KIL is the prized resource that
up until this very moment in time has kept the have-nots from getting their
“fair share.”
The
failure of us citizens of the world to get our mainstream media, our elected
leaders, local, regional and national as well as our non-elected government
officials to zero in on what is going on with the price of gold in recent
times, having reached a week ago today a 17 year high of $459 a troy ounce
before blasting through the $470 level eventually with massive interference by
central banks and currency traders causing a retreat not to $35 which is about
the maximum dollar value today that will allow them to possibly still play
their “funny games” but to a nothing to gloat about victory that still has gold
above its 17 year high at this precise moment in time.
There
is, however, nothing other than restoring “trust” back in government that can
now stop the inevitable rise of gold, hopefully not to levels that would
interfere with the Digital Age.
Then
again, gold is being used less and less in electronics, a concern I for one
have had should the price skyrocket to more realistic levels reflecting the SIGNIFICANT
level of distrust that begins and ends with the fictitious business of “Money
Creation” a subject matter I recently began taking up with President Bush.
Our
again “nothing” landlord-tenant case should never have found its way into the
court system bearing in mind we are talking about not good, but great tenants
such as my wife and me not only taking incredible care of a property with
significant deferred maintenance but paying top dollar for our second residence
in Del Mar; moreover, making it quite clear that we would be willing to pay
market rent if the owners wanted us to stay beyond the remainder of the lease
that expires next May, just 8 months away to mention little of the monies we
have spent on legal bills and court costs getting pretty close to covering the
rent remaining on the lease, forget all the aggravation that appears on the
surface to make little and no sense, never to forget Greedy Drug Pusher-thumbing his nose at the rule of
law Beckham’s
loud declaration on the stand, under oath, under penalty of perjury, “I have not had sex in over a year” when explaining what “personal
information” I had on him that had him so upset?
Judge
Bloom very possibly has other thoughts on his mind other than wanting to know
why my wife and I thought it so important to at least stand up for the rights
of the next generation, forget the overwhelming majority of renters today so
caught up in this “rat race”, so beaten to pulp by all the distraction, fighting
amongst themselves for the scraps?
The
slight of hands so obvious so long as one can find the time as well as
logically minded individuals to sift through all the nonsense?
Finding
people such as myself who seem to have a “knack” for getting hold of the
pertinent information NOT as
difficult as those creating all the distractions would prefer?
NOTHING more important than
Again,
I will in deference to Dr. John K. Pollard an alumnus of both MIT and
Below
is Greenspan’s masterpiece that was sent to me some time ago.
The Daily Reckoning
PRESENTS: Hard money week. Readers maybe surprised when they see who wrote this
essay. It’s about promoting gold as the key element of monetary organization,
written in 1966. This essay is taken from “The Liberty Dollar Solution,” edited
by Bernard von NotHaus.
GOLD AND ECONOMIC FREEDOM
by
Since the beginning of
World War I, gold has been virtually the sole international standard of
exchange.
Gold, having both
artistic and functional uses and being relatively scarce, has always been
considered a luxury good. It is durable, portable, homogeneous, divisible and,
therefore, has significant advantages over all other media of exchange.
But if all goods and
services were to be paid for in gold, large payments would be difficult to
execute, and this would tend to limit the extent of a society's division of
labor and specialization.
Thus, a logical extension
of the creation of a medium of exchange is the development of a banking system
and credit instruments (bank notes and
deposits) that act as a
substitute for, but are convertible into, gold.
A free banking system
based on gold is able to extend and thus to create bank notes (currency) and
deposits, according to the production of the economy. Individual owners of gold
are induced, by payments of interest, to deposit their gold in a bank (against
which they can draw checks).
But since it is rarely
the case that all depositors want to withdraw all their gold at the same time,
the banker need keep only a fraction of his total deposits in gold as reserves.
This enables the banker to loan out more than the amount of his gold deposits
(which means that he holds claims to gold rather than gold as security for his
deposits). But the amount of loans which he can afford to make is not
arbitrary: He has to gauge it in relation to his reserves and to the status of
his investments.
When banks loan money to
finance productive and profitable endeavors, the loans are paid off rapidly and
bank credit continues to be generally available. But when the business ventures
financed by bank credit are less profitable and slow to pay off, bankers soon
find that their loans outstanding are excessive relative to their gold
reserves, and they begin to curtail new lending, usually by charging higher
interest rates. This tends to restrict the financing of new ventures and
requires the existing borrowers to improve their profitability before they can obtain
credit for further expansion.
Thus, under the gold
standard, a free banking system stands as the protector of an economy’s
stability and balanced growth. When gold is accepted as the medium of exchange
by most or all nations, an unhampered free international gold standard serves
to foster a worldwide division of labor and the broadest international trade.
Even though the units of exchange (the dollar, the pound, the franc, etc.) differ
from country to country, when all are defined in terms of gold, the economies
of the different countries act as one - so long as there are no restraints on
trade or on the movement of capital.
Credit, interest rates
and prices tend to follow similar patterns in all countries. For example, if
banks in one country extend credit too liberally, interest rates in that
country will tend to fall, inducing depositors to shift their gold to
higher-interest-paying banks in other countries. This will immediately cause a
shortage of bank reserves in the "easy money" country, inducing
tighter credit standards and a return to competitively higher interest rates
again.
A fully free banking
system and fully consistent gold standard have not as yet been achieved. But prior
to World War I, the banking system in the
It was limited gold
reserves that stopped the unbalanced expansions of business activity, before
they could develop into the post-World War I type of disaster. The readjustment
periods were short and the economies quickly re-established a sound basis to
resume expansion.
But the process of cure
was misdiagnosed as the disease: if shortage of bank reserves was causing a
business decline - argued economic interventionists - why not find a way of
supplying increased reserves to the banks so they never need be short! If banks
can continue to loan money indefinitely - it was claimed - there need never be
any slumps in business. And so the Federal Reserve System was organized in
1913. It consisted of 12 regional Federal Reserve banks nominally owned by
private bankers, but, in fact, government sponsored, controlled and supported.
Credit extended by these banks is in practice (though not
legally) backed by the
taxing power of the federal government.
Technically, we remained
on the gold standard; individuals were still free to own gold, and gold
continued to be used as bank reserves. But now, in addition to gold, credit
extended by the Federal Reserve banks ("paper" reserves) could serve
as legal tender to pay depositors. When business in the
More disastrous, however,
was the Federal Reserve's attempt to assist Great Britain, who had been losing
gold to us because the Bank of England refused to allow interest rates to rise
when market forces dictated (it was politically unpalatable). The reasoning of
the authorities involved was as follows: If the Federal Reserve pumped excessive
paper reserves into American banks, interest rates in the
The "Fed"
succeeded: it stopped the gold loss, but it nearly destroyed the economies of
the world in the process. The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the
economy spilled over into the stock market - triggering a fantastic speculative
boom. Belatedly, Federal Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess
reserves and finally succeeded in braking the boom. But it was too late: By
1929 the speculative imbalances had become so overwhelming that the attempt
precipitated a sharp retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business
confidence.
As a result, the American
economy collapsed.
In the absence of the
gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through
inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would
have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold.
If everyone decided, for
example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good,
and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits
would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be
worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state
requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.
This is the shabby secret
of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a
scheme for the "hidden" confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the
way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If
one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’
antagonism toward the gold standard.
Regards,
“Sumtime”
[sic] today once I take care of other responsibilities such as exercising and
feeding my once in a lifetime body, getting in the right amount of exercise to
release the necessary endorphins to have me continuing to logically thought
process and at the same time benefiting significantly from watching my dog
behave the way a well trained dog that has not had its spirit broken is
supposed to behave, I will, G-d willing continue to explain the importance we
attach to the subject matter to the entire world, not just to Judge Bloom and
you, the law firm representing Greedy Drug
Pusher-I have not had sex in over a year Beckham who also serves as the
property m
To
be continued…
[Word
count 2420]
-----Original
Message-----
From: Walt Pinkerton [mailto:walt@help411.com]
Sent:
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: Re: Transcript
Attached letter I am forwarding
first class mail with enclosures. Please set a time for us to discuss
this matter.
Thank
you for your attention in this regard.
Best
regards,
Walter
-----
Original Message -----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
To: 'Teri Holden'
Cc: Walter E. Pinkerton, Jr. Esq.
Sent:
Subject: RE: Transcript
I send in my response email to Walt this morning “Yes,
I will pay those additional monies…” but why wasn’t I advised in the
first place that the $636 I paid at the end of the trial was just the first
installment?
[Word count 42]
-----Original Message-----
From: Teri Holden [mailto:thbear59@hotmail.com]
Sent:
To: gsg@sellnext.com
Subject: Transcript
The
transcript for you hearing will be ready in two weeks. It will cost
$528.50 to order.
Teri S. Holden