From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:54 AM PT
To: John Pollard - JKPJKP@alum.mit.edu
Cc: rest; Alyce Lomax - Motley Fool; Michele Malkin; JRK@class-action-law.com; Thabo Mvuyelwa Mbeki - President of South Africa; Trevor Manuel - South Africa's Minister of Finance
Subject: RE: What's not clear about this ??...DURBAN POISON

 

What's not clear about my response?

 

Are you serious or delirious?

 

Are you telling me that I should break my trust with G-d who empowers me most of all with logical thought processing?

 

How else do you suggest I call “sumone” [sic] on their intellectual dishonesty to mention little of taking me for a fool by ending their bs with “am taking you at your word…”?

 

I think you need to check the ingredients of your curry powder to make sure it does not contain Durban Poison.

 

[Word count 87]

 


From: John K. Pollard Jr.
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:26 AM
To: gary s gevisser
Subject: What's not clear about this ??

 

Gary, I am telling you now I do not want any of what I am writing to you in this message to be published or repeated. I am in the divorce process and am attempting to protect myself as much as I can. Call it a self defense mode. An unrelated item is that my old computer has no firewall and  I have recently had security issues  I have no way of knowing if it related to my name and email "out there" but I am concerned. Please honor my request to not link my name. I am not putting my head in the sand because I don't believe there is truth in your words, but I cannot afford to have my head blown off in the divorce. I do not want to supply any ammunition that would allow it. Is this clear English?  If not, I will clarify further. I am taking you at your word that you will not repeat this.

 

John K. Pollard Jr.
12676 Torrey Bluff Dr.,  Unit 244
San Diego, CA 92130-4267
858.481.1555