From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:39 PM PT
To:
Cc: rest;
Subject: I thought you might be interested in the email I just sent Mr.
Steven R. Weisman of the New York Times who was
carefully chosen to write the article,
U.S. Seeks Bigger China Role in I.M.F.
My 411 odd word email read as follows:
What
if
"China is showing their anger towards us because now they are
so powerful and all we are trying to tell them is what to do to help with their poor image and when they fail to do what they
should do they are aggressive towards us; China is the new Soviet-Evil Empire!
We don’t
know about their armed strength but there are a lot of people in
They still
think Chairman Mao was a great man; admired him, we can all agree, for his
inner strength.
But that
is the past, the future is what we are now concerned
about and
Mr.
Weisman, where did you get your schooling?
The
Chinese have done better and better.
Don't
you think they will join together should our words of war result in an armed
battle with the
I,
for one, who has just spent 24 days on a "fact finding mission" to China don’t think we are equipped to
do battle with anyone, let alone the Chinese who could only lose by picking up
our gauntlet to have these hard working people, so non-aggressive "increase
their influence" in not only a morally corrupt IMF but one that is
very much financially bankrupt.
We
shouldn’t be telling anyone what to do.
Instead,
we should be following what
In
all the time I was there with my wife, neither of us saw a real unhappy Chinese
out there.
The
idea of, "Lets make the whole world feel
That
is the wrong attitude.
Mr.
Weisman, I also didn’t get off a boat just yesterday.
Moreover,
I was last in
Let
me know if I can help any further in your reeducation although I think we both
know those who butter your bread at this time are very pleased with you.
But
that “tTOo” [sic]
WILL change.