From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject: FW: Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes and Lerach
Devin – suffice to say I would have liked the conversation with your father to have gone a whole lot smoother, constantly looking for a way out so that he could hang his head high, but while he “ducked and dived” throwing words at me resembling so closely the type of language used by my mother back in December 2001 when she was hell bent on me not “upsetting the applecart” eventually usurping her limited authority much like Marie’s former husband back on September 11th 2002 3 days after I refused to take his “bait”, so obsessed are some of our elders with their own fictitious legacies thinking that they can somehow hold back the tides of change.
May
the Good
gg
-----Original
Message-----
From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:09 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes and Lerach
Mr. Standard,
To repeat, my partner-wife’s expression,
“When the dialogue becomes too monologues it is the beginning of the end” [sic].
Your decision to end our dialogue at 8:52 PM PST after 48 minutes and 49 seconds on the basis that you considered my remarks governing human decency and logical thought processing to be a “personal attack” on you is akin to my mother only willing to debate people who agree with her.
In the words of your son Devin,
Any, and all moral highground is undermined if the minute one's proprietary
skin has been saved, one turns a blind eye to lesser, equivalent, or
greater evil. The fact that the gift of one's life has been spared
obligates one to, if not ruthlessly wield the sword of righteousness, to
at the very least, shine a light into the dark corners where evil
manifests. Otherwise you are abetting the Devil you've recently dodged.
Perhaps with the time approaching midnight on the east coast, assuming you are home with Mrs. Standard, one can excuse you being “quick tempered” with me?
Then again your comments were much like Melvyn Weiss’ mutterings on March 22nd 2002, 10:31 PM ET, agree?
So who do you think was the possible imposter in the posting on the eRaider.com website some 3 minutes later with this, both Melvyn Weiss Esq. who I understand to be a member of the New York State Bar, as well as his “front” Professor Aaron Brown quite adamant that Melvyn Weiss Esq. although a moderator of eRaider’s Shareholder Rights lounge has yet to post a single message going back to the beginning of their voyage together,,, why the cover up?
I can understand a lot of things that may be going through your mind in your attempts to convince me otherwise, but at age 47 I am rather long in the tooth having been pretty much “home schooled” by pretty smart parents, stress no doubt a killer, worse, in my opinion, is the damage one does to your next of kin by failing to do the right thing, agree?
So good it seems are the better educated in pontificating where they went wrong in life, at least that is what I surmise takes place when they get “face to face” with their maker, agree?
In my opinion you have done more than simply allow your formal education to interfere with your learning, causing me to think a little more about your very thoughtful wife’s parting comment, “Be Careful” when she and I spoke on Friday May 7th, my getting the sense that as busy as you are quite a lot must have gone through your head during these past 13 odd days?
Nothing to be gained at this time by spelling things out given your reluctance, again in my opinion, to handle the truth to mention just in passing I never asked for you to do anything more than “introduce” me to the prosecutors who have already convened 2 Grand Juries seeking an indictment against Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes and Lerach, so for you to throw at me your unwillingness to place your “reputation” on the line as if such individuals would be reliant on your “good name” to influence the grand jury members seems a little overboard?
To mention little of my pointing out to you a Grand Jury only gets to hear the prosecutions side of the story, the prosecutors no doubt already believing they have a good case without any of the irrefutable “smoking gun evidence” in my possession, wouldn’t you agree?
With that said, when you have the time, check out this+this=that.
Sincerely yours,
Ps – You say that you have appeared many times before Federal Judge Jack B. Weinstein. I could not find any reference on The Internet to him citing you in any way, good, bad or indifferent, different to what you see in the “wise” hyperlink.
Ps I – Perfect Storm II may one day become standard text book reading for both prospective lawyers and business students assuming future generations see a need for either, the Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit [SCAL] I have been developing against Citigroup will with G-D’s help appear in full on The Internet in short order should I not get assistance from those in the business of practicing, law.
