From: Gary S. Gevisser
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 6:08 PM PT
To: Adam L Tucker
Cc: rest; Leutenant William Kemery - San Diego Sheriffs Department Internal Affairs Unit; FBI; The Cow - BIG BEN aka The IT's writer; Devin Standard; Dr. Rod Smith - Waterstrategist.com; Office of the Israeli Defense Department Attache - Israeli Embassy Washington DC.; Mossad; George Hurst Esq. - Lawyer-liar for Dr. John Ben Stewart aka Sperm Donor; United States Justice Department
Subject: THE IT - MEMO TO FILE

 

What do you think of Marie’s nearly 16 year old kid Jonathan just letting us know before heading out the door to go surfing that he finally got The IT to confirm that he had unilaterally deducted some US$800 out of Marie's child support when Marie had hurt her back and Jonathan stayed with The IT for some10 days, all the while Jonathan was also “deafeningly silent”.

 

And on top of it The IT apparently told Jonathan in response to Jonathan saying that Marie wanted The IT to explain this all to her, said, “I would like to talk to her”.

 

And to really top it off Jonathan said that he agreed with The IT that Marie should pick up the phone and speak to The It, and of course The IT is his “father” and Jonathan Stewart doesn’t refer to BIG BEN HANDOUT as The IT.

 

Bear in mind that at first Jonathan couldn’t remember receiving a carbon copy of the following email from Marie despite me asking him twice; bearing in mind he has received so very few emails from Marie, let alone one where both the San Diego Sheriffs Department and FBI are carbon copied along with Jonathan and his sister, Danielle.

 

Date:

Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT)

From:

"Marie Dion Gevisser" <mdg0013@yahoo.com>

Subject:

Child support - Trespassing

To:

jbstewartmd@aol.com, jbste@aol.com

CC:

danielle stewart; Jonathan Stewart, William.Kemery@sdsheriff.org, Sandiego@fbi.gov

 

You have once again taken, without informing me, monies out of my child support without consulting me on the expenses, and you are late. This has been going on for many years. I thought I made it clear you needed to discuss these expenses ahead of time.

 

Nor have I forgotten the fact that Jonathan made us aware that you trespassed on to our property at 101 11th Street on at least one “occasion” [sic], which is in violation of the restraining order placed on you by Judge Hendrix.

 

Marie

 

BTW as I began to read the email above that Marie sent to The It, just as Marie was coming up the stairs out of the garage here at the cliff house, Jonathan remembered that he had read it, but he said he never brought up anything when speaking with The IT about The IT trespassing on our property, or the fact that The IT violated the Restraining Order.

 

And of course Jonathan hasn’t let us know whether he has reconsidered his position, “I don’t think my father would steal” which were the only words that came out of his mouth following a 2 hour walk on the beach during the Easter break, with Marie and his sister who did most of the talking.

 

Not to mention how they both treated Marie seated in the back of the car on the ride home to their loud music that it was quite obvious none of them were enjoying, apart from the “tTOo” [sic] kids deriving great satisfaction.

 

Once a liar always a liar.

 

A liar is a thief, is a thief, is a thief.

 

Remember, neither kid asked to be born nor did they ask to be placed in the “middle of a divorce”.

 

Moreover, neither kid has a say in The IT being all about “money, me” and what else would you expect The IT to do?

 

Nothing stops either kid from stopping taking The IT’s ill-gotten monies and/or “calling him on it”; moreover becoming financially independent which of course means getting a real job rather than playing professional surfer or college student; worse yet having so many “sports of choice”.

 

One point to emphasize. Jonathan told me not once but twice when I couldn’t quite believe his answer to my question, “Do you think your mother should break the email communications and pick up the phone and talk” to The It; twice, again, not once, he looked me straight in the eyes and said, “Yes”.

 

Bear in mind Jonathan nor his sister have responded in writing to any of Marie’s emails directly to them, either.

 

Would you have the energy to bother?

 

Even if you don’t have any further comment please place this as a “Memo to file” and then when the time is right link it to my forthcoming explanation of “What goes around comes around with a vengeance – first - short-circuits-emotion-deafening silence-speaks volume-truth”.

 

Ps – note that I placed a “sic” after the misspelled word “occasion” in the email Marie sent The IT on May 1st.

 

Ps I – Note that at the very start of the criminal court proceedings on October 24th, 2002 that followed The IT and Co. filing on 9/11/2002 a baseless criminal complaint against me highly suggestive of sexual misconduct, Judge Hendrix went out of his way to let The IT and his lawyer George Hurst Esq. know that he, the judge, did not think there was any evidence whatsoever against me doing anything wrong; on the contrary Judge Hendrix made it patently clear he was going to rule against The IT’s request that The IT receive a Permanent Restraining Order against me and that it was also patently clear that this “dispute” was one between Marie who I was not married to and The IT, having nothing whatsoever to do with me, and that a more appropriate venue would be Family Court.

 

And of course The It refused to heed the advice of Judge Hendrix who eventually ruled not only 110% in my and Marie’s favor but in giving Marie legal possession of a handgun that I had given to her, who I was not living with, only to protect herself physically against the maniac IT, Judge Hendrix lowered what was nothing short of the biggest boom on The IT’s head.

 

Again, you have a Superior Court Judge who has seen pretty much every “trick in the trade” used by mostly out-of-control men to bully mostly women who care mostly about protecting their offspring much more so than themselves, going to the extreme measure of approving someone who does not have a license to own a handgun retaining possession of such a handgun; the judge knowing perfectly well that I could go out myself that same very day and purchase another one or as many as I want; moreover, he could have just as easily said to Marie that if she felt in any way threatened to go through the legal process of getting her own handgun which the judge would know takes about 20 minutes of Marie’s time but then there is the background check by the Justice Department that takes a whole lot more time and one can never tell how The IT was going to react right after this most awesome court victory which should go down in history as one of the greatest victories for all women, first and foremost.

 

Moreover, as The IT continued to protest, not able to believe his eyes that for the first time in his entire life someone other than Marie was standing up to him and telling him time and again, “No, no, no!!!” the judge, exacerbated by this totally out-of-control all about “money, me” human beast, said, “If you are insistent that I place a Permanent Restraining Order on Mr. Gevisser, let me explain to you that I will at the very same time place a Permanent Restraining Order on you” and while Mr. Hurst Esq. who also couldn’t believe his eyes that The IT was going to go down this most extraordinary “suicidal course”, Hurst Esq., so very embarrassed by his constantly lying client, doing his best to explain to The It the dire straits implications of The IT about to get a Permanent Restraining Order PLACED ON HIM, The IT insisted that is what he wanted, and I couldn’t help but notice a sparkle in Judge Hendrix’s eyes as he said,

 

“So be it, I am placing a Restraining Order on you as well!”

 

Bear in mind that my great friend Devin Standard was in court that day and so was Marie’s French Canadian friend most excellent engineer Paul Hervieux, both witnessing this most blessed day.

 

And of course, Devin today knows exactly what he needs to do get off the “$ hit list” [sic], it helping a lot were he to call me from the Oval Office.

 

Nor have you forgotten how The IT in his most bizarre prior moves to the screaming out in the packed courtroom, “he” meaning me, “has a gun”, presented as evidence of my “wrongdoing” the very carefully crafted will [see below] Marie had her neighbor attorney Jim McFarland witness back on January 3rd, 2002, the very day the share price of Vivendi and its 63% owned wholly owned subsidiary Vivendi Environmental began to experience a precipitous and continuous 280 day share price collapse, losing some US$63 billion in market value; not to mention my close associate Dr. Rod Smith had met just 5 odd days earlier, December 28th, 2001 with California Governor Gray Davis to discuss a “White Paper” [click HERE] concerning the significant water problems facing California; to mention little of 10 minutes before Rod’s meeting began, Davis ended a meeting with Andy Seidel, Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Environmental who was accompanied by Vivendi’s General Counsel,  a Mr. Stanek?; to mention in passing, on or around January 11th, 2002 a meeting took place at Vivendi Environmental’s headquarters in Palm Desert, California where the principals of the Wetherly Capital Group, the folks who had arranged both meetings, again 10 minutes apart, met with both Seidel and Stanek, before Seidel then got on a plane to Paris, France to attend a board meeting of the parent company Vivendi which again remember is the world’s largest multinational water conglomerate.

 

 

In order to have got hold of Marie’s will, The IT had to have illegally accessed my proprietary internet database that contained much more “sensitive” material including names of witnesses as well as what testimony they would be willing to give “under oath” pertaining to an epic class action lawsuit against Revlon Corporation and its Chief Executive Officer Ronald O. Perelman, that I was intimately involved with.

 

One week prior to our court proceeding before Judge Hendrix on October 24th, 2002, Mr. Jeffrey R. Krinsk of Finkelstein & Krinsk had deposed in a 9+ hour deposition spanning some 378 pages of typed text, one of the ROP’s former senior executives who for good reason referred to Perelman as “Capo Di Capi” [click HERE].

 

When The IT and Co. illegally accessed my proprietary database in finding Marie’s will they would also have found all this highly sensitive information.

 

The IT is in fact one of the dumbest crooks in the world which is what makes him so dangerous given how intelligent crooks like his neighbor King Golden Jr. and Roger W. Robinson make it their business to “wind up” this much more Aryan looking Hitler.

 

[Word count 1807]