At Behest of AIG Chief, Grasso Pushed NYSE Firm to
Buy Stock
By Kate Kelly and Susanne Craig
1,389 words
The Wall Street Journal
A1
English
(Copyright (c) 2003, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Former New York Stock Exchange Chairman Dick Grasso pressured a major Big Board floor firm to increase its purchases of shares of giant insurer American International Group Inc. after Mr. Grasso received written complaints from AIG Chairman Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, according to people familiar with the matter.
The unusual move involving buying of one of the Big Board's largest stocks raises questions about whether Mr. Grasso favored AIG because of Mr. Greenberg'sprevious role as an NYSE director and member of the board's compensation committee. Mr. Greenberg was on the NYSE's compensation committee when the controversial employment contract that ultimately led to Mr. Grasso's ouster was developed and approved.
In an
The 211-year-old Big Board uses the specialist system to provide liquidity, or ease of trading, in its listed stocks. Each specialist firm serves as a market maker in specific assigned stocks, matching buy and sell orders from investors. When buyers and sellers can't agree on a price, specialists are required to step in with their own capital to buy or sell shares to facilitate trading.
Any additional buying by Spear of AIG shares could have artificially boosted the insurance company's shares.
Mr. Grasso, 57 years old, was ousted two weeks ago as NYSE chief after an outcry over his retirement pay that totaled $187.5 million, including a $48 million future retirement package, which he said initially he would forgo.
Through a representative, Mr. Grasso declined to comment.
Edward Kwalwasser, NYSE's executive vice president for regulation, said he was unaware of any conversations between Mr. Grasso and Spear. He says the exchange receives about 560 letters a year from firms questioning trading in their stocks. Such concerns, whether sent to Mr. Grasso or others, typically are routed to the NYSE's market-surveillance unit, which would then investigate the matter.
Mr. Greenberg, 78, confirms that he wrote the letter and has criticized the NYSE specialist system for years, but he shrugs off any conflict in requesting greater risk-taking on Spear's part. "If I think the specialist is not doing the job he should be doing in buying stock when the stock is under pressure . . . then I'm going to complain," Mr. Greenberg, who served on the NYSE board and compensation committee from 1996 to mid-2002, said in an interview. He said it would be wrong to "read something sinister" into his actions. "I expect as a listed company to have the exchange do what it's supposed to do," Mr. Greenberg said. "I will do whatever's right for shareholders of AIG."
A Goldman spokesman said: "As the specialist, we commit capital to facilitate orderly trading and this involves the assumption of risk. We do this for all our clients."
It's unclear whether there was a market need for
Spear to buy the AIG shares at the time. But some NYSE floor members say
any such intervention by an exchange chief isn't the norm. "In 16 years as
a member, I've never seen m
The disclosure comes amid a continuing exchange
investigation into the practices of the floor's elite specialists. The exchange
is examining whether some specialists, including Spear,
With respect to AIG, Spear could have rebuffed Mr. Grasso's suggestions to buy additional stock during price declines if the specialist firm believed it was inappropriate. But Spear, according to people familiar with the trading, chose not to, concerned that the loss of a blue-chip name such as AIG would be a blow and negatively impact its ability to win other important corporate clients in the future. However, the Goldman spokesman said that Spear was "acutely conscious" of the need to fulfill its responsibilities and believed it always acted appropriately. Spear is the exchange's second-largest specialist firm, making markets in about 600 stocks.
Mr. Greenberg's
AIG shares rose in the wake of Mr. Greenberg's
letter -- though it isn't clear how much can be attributed to Spears's trading.
On
In late November, AIG shares began to decline. In December 2002, Mr. Greenberg again wrote to Mr. Grasso. "I don't believe the . . . market they are making" is adequate, Mr. Greenberg wrote. "Size does matter, and capital commitment size matters." His complaints persisted over the course of the next year, the people familiar with the matter say.
Mr. Greenberg's grievances about the AIG specialist go back a long way. In 1992, AIG was reassigned from a previous specialist firm to Spear after the NYSE had discussions with the previous specialist "concerning its performance," the Big Board said at the time. And several times in recent years, Mr. Grasso visited the exchange floor and suggested that Spear buy more AIG shares, says someone close to the matter. Sometimes, Mr. Grasso would merely relay Mr. Greenberg's dissatisfaction with the trading, this person says; other times, he personally would encourage the specialist to buy more stock or risk losing the AIG assignment.
Meanwhile, the complaints were awkward for Goldman, Spear's parent. AIG was an important investment-banking client that had relied on Goldman for a number of merger deals and debt offerings over the years, contributing millions in banking fees. But Spear's trading of AIG on the floor was becoming costly, forcing a greater investment in the AIG shares than in any other issuer client, according to a person familiar with the trading. Goldman acquired Spear for $6.5 billion in late 2000.
Even though a specialist has obligations to keep
markets orderly, "he's not obliged to go beyond those duties because
someone told him to do so," says Roy C. Smith, a former Goldman partner
and now professor at
--- Theo Francis contributed to this article.