From: T4
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 6:41 AM
To: Gary S. Gevisser
Subject: FW: Interesting read...

 

I will give you the relevant (about 30) e-mail adresses involved in this debate once the time is right.

 

As usual, read from the bottom up, all participants on the e-mail are South African Black youth

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tefo

Sent: 02 December 2005 04:24 PM
To: TM
Cc: A whole lot of people…

Subject: RE: FW: Interesting read...

 

Kwena! (kapa ke tlhapi?)

 

Cultures are brands/organizations.

 

They come, they go.

 

Purpose of language is to express a concept/idea/feeling so other humans can understand and/or agree with you i.e. to influence others.

 

Also, it is my humble opinion that English has developed so much because its custodians (whoever they are) are quick to embrace other cultures and take the (steal?) the good out of them and progress their own culture/language (simple example, Tea and Ceylon/Sri Lanka/India).

 

Unfortunately human languages do a poor job of expressing one's concepts/ideas/feelings.

 

Mathematics is the closest you get to a pure language, little room for ambiguity.

 

That's my 2 cents worth

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: TM

Sent: 02 December 2005 04:13 PM
To: SM; Tefo

Cc:  A whole lot of people

Subject: RE: FW: Interesting read...

 

Having read your argument SM it is crystal clear that words, (English words, that is) come at great ease to you. There is no doubt that you have thought about this subject at some depth. I know that you have simplified your argument significantly for our benefit and your argument makes a lot of sense. Having a single medium of communication that everyone understands will make for effective communication and probably facilitate language development as well. There are just two points, however, that compel me to disagree with you completely.

 

Firstly, language is too often the primary identifier of cultures and ethnicity. Far too many cultures are strongly bound by the language that identifies them. People are proud and possessive of their language. Le nna kele tjena ke motlotlo haholo ha kele Mosotho wa mme ya anang phoofolo ya metsing le ntate ya anang phoofolo a busang thota. Sekgowa sena le ha kesetseba hofeta beng ba sona, nkeke ka tsoha ke lebetse puo ya Mme hohang! It is my opinion that the benefits of having a single medium just do not justify the means ( i.e. the sacrifice of other languages).

 

Secondly, your appropriation theory is a very interesting one, however, the example you used about black Americans is not a particularly good one. Exactly what is the "black culture" that has emerged that you are referring to? What identifies that "culture"? Is it the baggy jeans that are often seen in rap music videos? Is there music that identifies this "culture"? Do Indian descents form part of this "culture"? Do Hispanics (who descend from Spain , Mexico and the rest of Latin America form part of this culture)? Is it even a culture in it's own rights? I agree that there was a conglomeration of different races that united in America as a result of them being victims of racial discrimination. However, I do not agree that these races used English to communicate in the interest of unity, or in the interest of the new "black culture" or "African unity" or anything to that effect. The primary use of English was a direct result of British colonialism and it is the same reason that central African countries speak French while southern African countries speak Portuguese.

 

Before I close I would like to mention that you have not really commented on the initial question that was posed regarding why there exists a tendency to undermine efforts of black South Africans trying to speak English while Afrikaaner attempts at African languages are praised. If you were born Afrikaaner (en ek meen 'n regte boer), would you still subscribe to your single medium theory if the de facto and de jure language happened to be TshiVenda?

 

In his 1958 novel, Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe wrote "A culture without the ability to change, is but without the means of its own preservation". I definitely agree that cultures should evolve for the benefit of the general societies in which they exist. However… as much as I recognize the merits of you single medium of communication argument, I do not subscribe to the one language fits all school of thought.

 

TM

 


From: SM

Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 10:37 AM
To: Tefo

Cc: A whole lot of people…

Subject: Re: FW: Interesting read...

 


The lingua franca debate is an interesting one, I studied  the subject and debated it  with all my friends for years.
There is a theory of appropriation, where the slaves have developed their on language out of English,  this is prevalent in the Caribbean, but more so within the Indian population of South Africa. They eat their own food dress in their own Indian saris, the long a short of it is that though they speak English they haven't  lost their Indian identity, They have different languages like us, Gujarati, Telugu and Arabic, this brings me to the gist of my appropriation theory.

At the heart of the appropriation theory is that you don't seek to reverse your circumstances but you start to take control of them, you add purpose to your actions e.g black American they are English speaking but a black culture has emerge with no doubt. In the interest of African nationalism English is the most appropriate language to use . The Mozambique government is planning to do away with Portuguese in the interest of finding unity with the rest of the SADC region , whilst we still argue about Zulu and Ndebele, before you conclude, I studied Zulu and English at tertiary level I know what I am talking about, language evolves, based on two driving forces unity or segregation. The Ntu people of Southern Africa they all once spoke the same language evidence of this is in their culture or simply, the word Abantu, the main syllable here is ntu which is common also in  seSotho, batho, the sound is the same though the word is spelled  differently, theory of the signifier and the signified come into play before the spelling issue, which I can explain in details in another e-mail. but central to my argument is that  can we afford parallel development of 10/11 languages? will that  yield the desired result as oppose to single medium that encapsulate all of our cultures. What will be the best approach to language development. I will argue very strongly that single medium is the future, regardless of the fact that who dominates it, That is appropriation lets take it and make ours.


In conclusion let us learn from our children who are now exposed to unity( all racial groups and ethnic groupings in one school) as oppose to separation  due to group areas Act, that our parents were subjected to. The negative results of that is that though the ANC is a nationalist organisation, we know who dominates it and why.


lastly have you ever wonder how language develops, imagine a bushman meeting with an Eskimo, their environments are different, its is called a convention people agree on the signifier and the signified and between them they got a word that id got the same  meaning.


Is failing to listen to reason instead getting preoccupied with the technicalities of the language , the accent the choose of words, France Fanon has written a lot about this subject mind you France wrote in French and is regarded as the founder of black consciousness in the African continent, imagine if we confined ourselves to South Africa we will be thinking in terms of the country not the continent.

Mayibuye iAfrica, lets us remove the artificial boundaries
In Senyanja which is spoken in Malawi and is about 11centuries old  "piyaveka" (which means when you listen to reason sense prevails in only one word).
The ultimate goal is to remove language as measure of intelligence because all languages are a fragment of some knowledge, If knowledge is contained in one language there will be peace in the world.

Peace out


-----Original Message-----
From: NP
Sent: 30 November 2005 10:01 AM
To: A whole lot of people

Subject: Interesting read...


NO APOLOGY FOR ANY OFFENCE

"Why do we laugh at a black man/black people who are struggling to
speak/write English and not laugh at (white man) speaking appalling
Xhosa/Zulu/Sotho" We all have done this, thought that boxers/soccer
players are idiots(Nomvete, Vuyani Bungu) because they cannot speak
good English.

Ever thought about De Klerk who does not know a single Xhosa word, He
cannot even pronounce your name to start with.

In the office they pronounce your name wrongly and you just smile. You
are impressed when Mrs van Wyk is trying to speak Xhosa/Zulu. In 15
yrs she managed to learn Molo/Sawubona only...and you are impressed by
that sick crap. Why does it never occur to you that Mrs Van Wyk is an
idiot, a certified moron...who is not capable of learning one single
african language" What is compelling me to be writing this email in
English not


in Zulu ??????? I know all the recipients are Xhosa, Zulu or Sotho;
therefore they will be able to read and understand this email. Having
realised that I still continue writing in English. My excuse "I am
faster when I write in English (Crap!) I was not born speaking
English. Listen to your voice mail. It is in English and how many
whites call you compared to the blacks? Why do you have to cater for
the 10%. You do not even have a white friend yet your everything is in
English. That is pathetic.

If I told you that I had a degree in Xhosa/Sotho you would all laugh
for you do not see why someone in his right mind would want to a
degree in Xhosa/Sotho. Yet French classes are over flowing...My sister
cannot even write isiXhosa/Sotho she detaste the language and know one should be
learning isiXhosa/Sotho.

Afrikaans are preserving Stellenbosch, RAU, Tuks ( Pretoria) and all
the varsities in the Transvaal region....What are we preserving Unitra
will be closed...UniVenda may follow suit ...Uni Zulu maybe on the
pipe line (But we have Fort hare).. Afrikaans (7% of the SA
population) has 5 universities that they control. Little bit on maths
=> there should be 64 black varsities to level the grounds. That would
be a waste I agree but this serve the purpose...

Nokia recently introduced a phone with menus in Xhosa/Zulu/Sotho...we
think that "it for people who cannot read English", Amaqaba. When you
phone Vodacom service centre you always press 1 (to be helped in
English press 1, Zulu press 2 (Xhosa), Sotho press 3, Afrikaans 4).
Why is it that you'd rather stammer than speak your own language.

We are all slaves... Our minds have been crippled and we will never be
free until we free ourselves...

"Emancipate your selves from mental slavery none but our selves can
free our minds"

'' Forward this to those lilly whites that you think are better than
yourself and those blacks that cannot speak African languages''

IF YOU DON'T, IT WILL BE PROOF ENOUGH THAT YOU ENJOY BEING A SLAVE